Complutense University Library

The role of networking in the competitiveness profile of Spanish firms.


Álvarez González, Isabel and Fonfría Mesa, Antonio and Marín, Raquel (2005) The role of networking in the competitiveness profile of Spanish firms. [ Working papers; nº 04, 2005, ]

Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.


Official URL:


Two main forces coincide nowadays in the characterisation of productive systems. On the one hand, the internationalisation of markets and economic activities has resulted in an increasing competition worldwide and a new and more global division of labour. On the other, the greater complexity of technology makes innovation a key factor in manufacturing firms’ competitiveness. Cooperative network relationships seem to be important in both processes. This paper aims to explore this aspect in the competitiveness behaviour of four Spanish manufacturing industries: food, chemicals, electronics and vehicles. Data has been obtained from a survey conducted specifically for this purpose at the firm level. Findings from the empirical analysis, based on the application of the Polytomus Logit Universal Model (PLUM), confirm the positive effects of the ability to network on company performance, particularly, intra-firm cooperation, cooperation between competitors and user-producer relationships.

Resumen (otros idiomas)

La internacionalización de mercados, de actividades económicas y la creciente competencia global son algunos de los factores que caracterizan los sistemas productivos actuales. A ello se suma una intensa complejidad tecnológica que afecta tanto a productos como a procesos productivos, concediéndole a la innovación un papel clave en la competitividad de las empresas manufactureras. En ambos procesos, las relaciones de cooperación empresarial se erigen como forma organizativa de creciente importancia. En este documento se explora la relación entre cooperación y comportamiento competitivo en cuatro industrias manufactureras: alimentación, química, electrónica y automóviles. La información estadística se ha obtenido a partir de una encuesta realizada a nivel microeconómico y diseñada específicamente con este fin en España. Los resultados que se derivan del análisis empírico, basados en la aplicación de un modelo Logit Universal (PLUM), confirman los efectos positivos de las relaciones cooperativas en los resultados empresariales, concretamente las relaciones intra-empresa, la cooperación entre competidores y las relaciones usuario-proveedor.

Item Type:Working Paper or Technical Report
Uncontrolled Keywords:Co-operation; Networking; Innovation; Competitiveness
Palabras clave (otros idiomas):Relaciones cooperativas; Innovación; Competitividad
Subjects:Social sciences > Economics > Industrial organization
Social sciences > Economics > Economic cooperation
Social sciences > Economics > Business enterprises
JEL:D24, D85, O32
Series Name:Working papers
ID Code:10564

Alonso, J. A. (1995), “International Process and Forms of Market Penetration: A Dynamic Proposal” in J.Molero (ed.), Technological Innovation, Multinational Corporations and New International CompetitivenessThe Case of Intermediate Countries, Harwood Academic Publishers, Reading.

Álvarez, I. (2003), Empresas extranjeras y efectos de derrame tecnológico o spillovers: Una aplicación a lasmanufacturas españolas, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Álvarez, I., Fonfría, A., Marín, R. (2004), Results from a Competitiveness Survey to the manufacturingSpanish firms, COMPETITIVENESS European Project, WP 6, Del. 4, (available at

Archibugi, D., Michie, J. (1995), “La Internacionalización de la Tecnología: Mito y Realidad”, InformaciónComercial Española, núm. 726, febrero, 23-42.

Archibugi, D., Ianmarino, S. (2000), “Innovación y globalización: evidencia e implicaciones”, in J. Molero,Competencia global y cambio tecnológico, 103-137, Pirámide, Madrid.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Lokshin, B. (2004), “Cooperative R&D and firm performance”, Research Policy,33, pp. 1477-1492.

Bajo, O., López, C. (1996), “La Inversión Extranjera Directa en la Industria Manufacturera Española, 1986-1993”, Papeles de Economía Española, vol. 66, 176-190.

Cantwell, J., Molero, J. (2003), Multinational Enterprises, Innovative Strategies and Systems of Innovation,Edward Elgar.

Cantwell, J., Mudambi, R. (2001), “MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates: an empiricalinvestigation”, ICEI Working Paper, DT 06/2001.

Cantwell, J., Piscitello, L. (2001), “The location of technological activities of MNCs in European Regions”,Fifth Seminar of the MESIAS Network, Proceedings, Reading.

Coase, R. H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica, vol. 4, num. 16, nov. 1937, 386-405.

Dosi, G., Pavitt, K., Soete, L. (1990), The economics of technical change and international trade, HarvesterWheatsheaf, London.

Dosi, G., Teece, D. J., Chytry, J. (1998), Technology, organisation and competitiveness, Oxford UniversityPress, Oxford.

Dunning J. H., (1973), “The determinants of international production”, Oxford Economic Papers, January1973.

Dunning, J. H, (1980), “Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical test”, Journalof International Business Studies, 11(1), 9-31.

Duysters, G., Hagerdoon, J. (1996), “Internationalisation of corporate technology through strategicpartnering: an empirical investigation”, Research Policy 25, 1-12.

Edquist, C. (ed.) (1997), Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, PinterPublishers, London.

Fonfría, A. (1999), “Patrones de innovación en la empresa española: un dato para la política tecnológica”,Papeles de Economía Española, vol. 81, 182-195.

Freel, M. S. (2003), “Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity”, Research Policy, 32,751-770.

Hamel, G., Prahalad, C. K. (1989), “Strategic Intent”, Harvard Business Review, may-june 1989.

Hortsmann, I. J., Markusen, J. R. (1996),“Exploring new markets: Direct investment, contractual relationsand the multinational enterprise”, International Economic Review, 37(1), 1-19.

Howells, J. (1990), “The Internationalization of R&D and the Development of Global Research Networks”,Regional Studies, vol. 24, 495-512.

Howells, J. (1999), “Regional Systems of Innovation?”, in D. Archibugi, J. Howells and J. Michie (eds.),Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge University Press.

Humphrey, J., Schimitz, H. (1996), “The triple C approach to local industrial policy”, World Development,vol. 24(12), pp. 1859-1877.

Jaffe, A. B. (1993), “Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations”,Quarterly Journal of Economics, 577-598.

Kleinknecht, A., Reijnen, J. (1992), “Why do Firms Cooperate on R&D? An Empirical Study”, ResearchPolicy, vol. 21, 347-360.

Krugman, P. (1991), “Increasing returns and economic geography”, Journal of Political Economy, 99(3),483-492.

Lundvall, B. A. (ed.). (1992), National Systems of Innovation, Pinter Publishers, London.

McCullagh, P., Nelder J. A. (1989), Generalized Linear Models, Chapman & may, London.

Marín, R. (2004), El impacto de las Fusiones y Adquisiciones Transfronterizas en la capacidad tecnológica delas empresas. Diploma de Estudios Avanzados. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Merino, F., Salas, V. (1995), “Empresa extranjera y manufactura española: efectos directos e indirectos”,Revista de Economía Aplicada, 9(3), 105-131.

Merino, F., Salas, V. (1996), “Diferencias de eficiencia entre empresas nacionales y extranjeras en el sectormanufacturero español”, Papeles de Economía Española, 66, 191-208.

Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991),“A note on the general definition of the coefficient of determination”,Biometrika, 78(3), 691-692.

OECD (1996), The Oslo Manual, OECD, Paris.

Patel, P., Pavitt, K. (2000), “National System of innovation under strain: the internationalisation of corporateR&D”, in R. Barrell, G. Mason, O’Mahoney (eds.), Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance,Cambridge University Press.

Pavitt, K. (1984), “Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory”, ResearchPolicy, 13, 343-373.

Pavitt, K. (2001), “Public Policies to Support Basic Research: What Can the Rest of the World Learn from USTheory and Practice? (And What They Should Not Learn)”, Industrial & Corporate Change, 10, 761-779.

Pearce, R. D. (1999), “Decentralised R&D and strategic competitiveness: globalised approaches to generationand use of technology in multinational enterprises”, Research Policy, 28, 157-78.

Rosenfeld, S. A. (1996), “Does cooperation enhance competitiveness? Assesing the impacts of inter-firmcollaboration”, Research Policy, 25, 247-263.

Saxenian, A. (1994), Regional Advantage –Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128,Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

Scott, A. J. (1992), “The role of large producers in industrial districts: a case study of high technologysystems houses in Southern California”, Regional Studies, vol. 26(3).

Soete, L., Verspagen, B. (1994), “Competing for Growth: The Dynamics of Technology Gaps”, in L. L.Pasinetti, R. M. Solow (eds.), Economic Growth and the Structure of Long-Term Development, St. Martin'sPress, New York.22

Storper,M. (1989), “The transition of flexible specialisation in the US film industry: external economies, thedivision of labour and the crossing of industrial divide”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 13(2), pp.273-305.

Teece, D. J. (1977), “Technology transfer by multinational firms: the resource cost of tranferingtechnological know-how”, The Economic Journal, 87, 242-262.

Verspagen, B., Wakelin, K. (1997), “Technology, Employment and Trade: Perspectives on EuropeanIntegration”, in J. Fagerberg, P. Hansson, L.

Lundberg, A. Melchior (eds.), Technology and InternationalTrade, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.

Von Hippel, E. (1988), The Sources of Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Williamson, O. (1975), Markets and hierarchies, Free Press, New York.

Deposited On:29 Apr 2010 10:58
Last Modified:26 Apr 2016 21:10

Repository Staff Only: item control page