Complutense University Library

GFC-Robust Risk Management Strategies under the Basel Accord

McAleer, Michael and Jiménez Martín, Juan Ángel and Pérez Amaral, Teodosio (2010) GFC-Robust Risk Management Strategies under the Basel Accord. [Working Paper or Technical Report] (Unpublished)

[img] PDF
434kB

Official URL: http://eprints.ucm.es/11322/

View download statistics for this eprint

==>>> Export to other formats

Abstract

A risk management strategy is proposed as being robust to the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) by selecting a Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecast that combines the forecasts of different VaR models. The robust forecast is based on the median of the point VaR forecasts of a set of conditional volatility models. This risk management strategy is GFC-robust in the sense that maintaining the same risk management strategies before, during and after a financial crisis would lead to comparatively low daily capital charges and violation penalties. The new method is illustrated by using the S&P500 index before, during and after the 2008-09 global financial crisis. We investigate the performance of a variety of single and combined VaR forecasts in terms of daily capital
requirements and violation penalties under the Basel II Accord, as well as other criteria. The median VaR risk management strategy is GFC-robust as it provides stable results across different periods relative to other VaR forecasting models. The new strategy based on combined forecasts of single models is straightforward to incorporate into existing computer software packages that are used by banks and other financial institutions.

Item Type:Working Paper or Technical Report
Additional Information:JEL Classifications: G32, G11, G17, C53, C22
Uncontrolled Keywords:Value-at-Risk (VaR), Daily capital charges, Robust forecasts, Violation penalties, Optimizing strategy, Aggressive risk management strategy, Conservative risk management strategy, Basel II Accord, Global financial crisis.
Subjects:Social sciences > Economics > Finance
Social sciences > Economics > Depressions
Series Name:Documentos de trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
Volume:UNSPECIFIED
Number:1001
ID Code:11322
References:

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, (1988), International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards, BIS, Basel, Switzerland.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, (1995), An Internal Model-Based Approach to Market Risk Capital Requirements, BIS, Basel, Switzerland.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, (1996), Supervisory Framework for the Use of “Backtesting” in Conjunction with the Internal Model-Based Approach to Market Risk Capital Requirements, BIS, Basel, Switzerland.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, (2006), International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards, a Revised Framework Comprehensive Version, BIS, Basel, Switzerland.

Berkowitz, J. and J. O'Brien (2001), How accurate are value-at-risk models at commercial banks?, Discussion Paper, Federal Reserve Board.

Black, F. (1976), Studies of stock market volatility changes, in 1976 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics Section, pp. 177-181.

Bollerslev, T. (1986), Generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327.

Borio, C. (2008), The financial turmoil of 2007-?: A preliminary assessment and some policy considerations, BIS Working Papers No 251, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland.

Caporin, M. and M. McAleer (2010a), The Ten Commandments for managing investments, Journal of Economic Surveys, 24, 196-200.

Caporin, M. and M. McAleer (2010b), Model selection and testing of conditional and stochastic volatility models, to appear in L. Bauwens, C. Hafner and S. Laurent (eds.), Handbook on Financial Engineering and Econometrics: Volatility Models and Their Applications, Wiley, New York (Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1676826).

Engle, R.F. (1982), Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation, Econometrica, 50, 987-1007. Franses, P.H. and D. van Dijk (1999), Nonlinear Time Series Models in Empirical Finance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Giacomini, R., and Komunjer, I. (2005), Evaluation and combination of conditional quantile forecasts. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 23, 416-431.

Gizycki, M. and N. Hereford (1998), Assessing the dispersion in banks’ estimates of market risk: the results of a value-at-risk survey, Discussion Paper 1, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.

Glosten, L., R. Jagannathan and D. Runkle (1992), On the relation between the expected value and volatility of nominal excess return on stocks, Journal of Finance, 46, 1779-1801.

Jimenez-Martin, J.-A., McAleer, M. and T. Pérez-Amaral (2009), The Ten Commandments for managing value-at-risk under the Basel II Accord, Journal of Economic Surveys, 23, 850-855.

Jorion, P. (2000), Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Li, W.K., S. Ling and M. McAleer (2002), Recent theoretical results for time series models with GARCH errors, Journal of Economic Surveys, 16, 245-269. Reprinted in M. McAleer and L. Oxley (eds.), Contributions to Financial Econometrics: Theoretical and Practical Issues, Blackwell, Oxford, 2002, pp. 9-33.

Ling, S. and M. McAleer (2002a), Stationarity and the existence of moments of a family of GARCH processes, Journal of Econometrics, 106, 109-117.

Ling, S. and M. McAleer (2002b), Necessary and sufficient moment conditions for the GARCH(r,s) and asymmetric power GARCH(r, s) models, Econometric Theory, 18, 722-729.

Ling, S. and M. McAleer, (2003a), Asymptotic theory for a vector ARMA-GARCH model, Econometric Theory, 19, 278-308.

Ling, S. and M. McAleer (2003b), On adaptive estimation in nonstationary ARMA models with GARCH errors, Annals of Statistics, 31, 642-674.

Lopez, J. A., (1999), "Methods for evaluating value-at-risk estimates," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, pages 3-17.

McAleer, M. (2005), Automated inference and learning in modeling financial volatility, Econometric Theory, 21, 232-261.

McAleer, M. (2009), The Ten Commandments for optimizing value-at-risk and daily capital charges, Journal of Economic Surveys, 23, 831-849.

McAleer, M., F. Chan and D. Marinova (2007), An econometric analysis of asymmetric volatility: theory and application to patents, Journal of Econometrics, 139, 259-284.

McAleer, M., J.-Á. Jiménez-Martin and T. Pérez-Amaral (2009), A decision rule to minimize daily capital charges in forecasting value-at-risk, to appear in Journal of Forecasting (Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1349844).

McAleer, Michael, J-A., Jiménez-Martin and T. Perez Amaral (2010), Has the Basel II Accord Encouraged Risk Management During the 2008-09 Financial Crisis? (Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1397239).

McAleer, M. and B. da Veiga (2008a), Forecasting value-at-risk with a parsimonious portfolio spillover GARCH (PS-GARCH) model, Journal of Forecasting, 27, 1-19.

McAleer, M. and B. da Veiga (2008b), Single index and portfolio models for forecasting value-at-risk thresholds, Journal of Forecasting, 27, 217-235.

Nelson, D.B. (1991), Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: a new approach, Econometrica, 59, 347-370.

Pérignon, C., Z.Y. Deng and Z.J. Wang (2008), Do banks overstate their value-at-risk?, Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 783-794.

Riskmetrics (1996), J.P. Morgan Technical Document, 4th Edition, New York, J.P. Morgan.

Shephard, N. (1996), Statistical aspects of ARCH and stochastic volatility, in O.E. Barndorff-Nielsen, D.R. Cox and D.V. Hinkley (eds.), Statistical Models in Econometrics, Finance and Other Fields, Chapman & Hall, London, 1-67.

Stahl, G. (1997), Three cheers, Risk, 10, pp. 67-69.

Zumbauch, G. (2007), A Gentle Introduction to the RM 2006 Methodology, New York, Riskmetrics Group.

Deposited On:15 Oct 2010 13:30
Last Modified:15 Nov 2013 10:49

Repository Staff Only: item control page