Chang, Chia-Lin and McAleer, Michael and Oxley, Les (2011) How are Journal Impact, Prestige and Article Influence Related? An Application to Neuroscience. [ Documentos de trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico; nº 25, 2011, ] (Unpublished)
Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Official URL: http://eprints.ucm.es/12933/
The paper analyses the leading journals in Neurosciences using quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAM), highlights the similarities and differences in alternative RAM, shows that several RAM capture similar performance characteristics of highly cited journals, and shows that some other RAM have low correlations with each other, and hence add significant informational value. Alternative RAM are discussed for the Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science database (hereafter ISI). The RAM that are calculated annually or updated daily include the classic 2-year impact factor (2YIF), 5-year impact factor (5YIF), Immediacy (or zero-year impact factor (0YIF)), Eigenfactor score, Article Influence score, C3PO (Citation Performance Per Paper Online), h-index, Zinfluence, PI-BETA (Papers Ignored - By Even The Authors), 2-year and historical Self-citation Threshold Approval Ratings (STAR), Impact Factor Inflation (IFI), and Cited Article Influence (CAI). The RAM are analysed for 26 highly cited journals in the ISI category of Neurosciences. The paper finds that the Eigenfactor score and PI-BETA are not highly correlated with the other RAM scores, so that they convey additional information regarding journal rankings, that Article Influence is highly correlated with some existing RAM, so that it has little informative incremental value, and that CAI has additional informational value to that of Article Influence. Harmonic mean rankings of the 13 RAM criteria for the 26 highly cited journals are also presented. Emphasizing the 2-year impact factor of a journal to the exclusion of other informative RAM criteria is shown to lead to a distorted evaluation of journal performance and influence, especially given the informative value of several other RAM.
|Item Type:||Working Paper or Technical Report|
The authors wish to thank three referees for helpful comments and suggestions. For financial support, the first author acknowledges the National Science Council, Taiwan; the second author acknowledges the Australian Research Council, National Science Council, Taiwan, and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; and the third author acknowledges the Royal Society of New Zealand, Marsden Fund.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Impact factor, Prestige, Immediacy, Eigenfactor, Article Influence, h-index, C3PO, Zinfluence, PI-BETA, STAR, IFI, Cited Article influence.|
|Subjects:||Social sciences > Library science and documentation > Databases|
Social sciences > Library science and documentation > Information retrieval
Medical sciences > Medicine > Neurosciences
|Series Name:||Documentos de trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico|
Bergstrom C. (2007), Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals, C&RL News, 68, 314-316.
Bergstrom, C.T., J.D. West and M.A. Wiseman (2008), The Eigenfactor™ metrics, Journal of Neuroscience, 28(45), 11433–11434 (November 5, 2008).
Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011), Great expectatrics: Great papers, great journals, great econometrics. Econometric Reviews, 30(6), 583-619.
Fersht, A. (2009), The most influential journals: Impact factor and Eigenfactor, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(17), 6883-6884 (April 28, 2009).
ISI Web of Science (2010), Journal Citation Reports, Essential Science Indicators, Thomson Reuters ISI.
Seglen, P.O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, BMJ: British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 498-502.
|Deposited On:||08 Jul 2011 08:32|
|Last Modified:||06 Feb 2014 09:36|
Repository Staff Only: item control page