Complutense University Library

Cooperación Interregional e Interregionalismo: Una Aproximación Socialconstructivista

Schünemann, Julia (2006) Cooperación Interregional e Interregionalismo: Una Aproximación Socialconstructivista. [ Working Papers; nº WP05/0, 2006, ]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

343kB

Official URL: http://eprints.ucm.es/13454/

View download statistics for this eprint

==>>> Export to other formats

Abstract

En el contexto de la post-guerra fría las regiones han surgido con fuerza como actores de la sociedad internacional, y están asumiendo identidades cada vez más pronunciadas y diversas. A través de sus relaciones externas y su interacción mutua se abren nuevos espacios como agentes del sistema internacional. La cooperación interregional es un proceso que merece ser analizado en sus propios términos. Es importante identificar el proceso de cooperación como factor constitutivo para las regiones que lo protagonizan y para el tipo de interregionalismo que emerge. También es pertinente estudiar el potencial impacto del interregionalismo en su naturaleza de institución social en la gobernanza global y en la génesis de un nuevo orden mundial. La perspectiva teórica del socialconstructivismo
permite tener en cuenta esas dimensiones de la cooperación interregional y del interregionalismo.
Abstract
In the wider context of the post cold war era, regions have emerged as actors in the international society, thus assuming more pronounced and diverse identities. Through their external relations and mutual interactions they have opened new spaces as agents within the international system.
Interregional cooperation is a process which should be studied in its own right. It is important to identify the process of cooperation as a constitutive element of the regions that engage in it, as well as for the nature of the emerging interregionalism that follows. Likewise, it is worthwhile to analyse the potential impact of interregionalism in terms of a social institution on global governance and the genesis of a new world order. The theoretical perspective of Social Constructivism allows to take these dimensions of interregional cooperation and interregionalism into consideration.


Item Type:Working Paper or Technical Report
Uncontrolled Keywords:Socialconstructivismo, Racionalismo, Cooperación interregional, Interregionalismo, Región, Identidades, Acción comunicativa, Normas constitutivas, Orden mundial, Social constructivism, Rationalism, Interregional cooperation, Interregionalism, Region, identity, Communicative action, Constitutive norms, World order.
Subjects:Social sciences > Economics > Economic cooperation
Social sciences > Economics > Regional economics
Series Name:Working Papers
Volume:2006
Number:WP05/0
ID Code:13454
References:

Adler, E. (2002), “Constructivism in International Relations”, en W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, 95 – 118.

Adler, E. (1998), “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics”, en European Journal of International Relations, 3:3, 319 – 363.

Adler, E., Barnett, M. (1996), “Governing Anarchy: A Research Agenda for the Study of Security Communities”, en Ethics and International Affairs 10, 63 – 98.

Aggarwal, V. K., Fogarty, E. A. (eds.) (2004), EU Trade Strategies. Between Regionalism and Globalism, Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, New York.

Aggarwal, V. K., Fogarty, E. A. (2004a), “Between Regionalism and Globalism: European Union Interregional Trade Strategies”, en V. K. Aggarwal, E. A. Fogarty (eds.), EU Trade Strategies. Between Regionalism and Globalism, 1 –40.

Aggarwal, V. K., Fogarty, E. A. (2004b), “Explaining trends in EU Interregionalism”, en V. K. Aggarwal, E.A. Fogarty (eds.), EU Trade Strategies. Between Regionalism and Globalism, 207 – 240.

Albert, M. (1994), «“Postmoderne” und Theorien der internationalen Beziehungen» [“La postmodernidad” y las teorías de las relaciones internacionales], en Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 1: 1, 45 – 63.

Aldecoa Luzárraga, F., Cornago Prieto, N. (1998), “El Nuevo Regionalismo y Reestructuración del Sistema Mundial”, en Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, Vol. I., 59 – 113.

Baldwin, D. A. (ed.) (1993), Neorealism and Neoliberalism. The Contemporary Debate, Columbia University Press, New York.

Benz, A., Fürst, D., Kilper, H., Rehfeld, D. (1999), Regionalisierung: Theorie-Praxis-Perspektiven [Regionalización: Perspectivas teóricas y prácticas], Leske + Budrich, Opladen.

Berger, P. L., Luckmann, T. (2001) [1966], La construcción social de la realidad, 17. edición (1ª edición en castellano, 1968), Amorrortu editores, Buenos Aires.(Título de la edición original en inglés: The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, Doubleday, New York).

Berger, P. L., Luckmann, T. (2004) [1966], Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit, 20ª edición (1a edición en alemán, 1969), Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.

Bersick, S. (2004), Auf dem Weg in eine neue Weltordnung? Zur Politik der interregionalen Beziehungen am Beispiel des ASEM-Prozesses, [Hacia un nuevo orden mundial? Acerca de la política de las relaciones interregionales: el ejemplo del proceso ASEM]156, Nomos, Baden-Baden.

Bodemer, K. (2001/2002), “Auf dem Weg zu einer strategischen Partnerschaft? Die europäisch –lateinamerikanischen Beziehungen an der Wende zum 21 Jahrhundert”, [Hacia una asociación estratégica? Las relaciones euro-latinoamericanas a principios del siglo 21], en W. Zippel (ed.), Die Beziehungen zwischen der EU und den Mercosur-Staaten. Stand und Perspektiven, 99 – 123.

Bretherton, C., Vogler, J. (1999), The European Union as a Global Actor, Routledge, London.

Breslin, S., Higgott, R., Rosamond, B. (2002), Regions in Comparative Perspective, Working Paper 107, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR), Warwick.

Brown, C. (1992), International Relations Theory. New Normative approaches, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hampstead.

Bull, H. (1977), The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Calduch, R. (2004), Métodos y técnicas de investigación en Relaciones Internacionales, Curso de doctorado, Madrid.

Calleya, S. C. (2000), Regionalism in the Post-Cold War World, Ashgate, Aldershot.

Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T., Simmons, B. (eds.) (2002), Handbook of International Relations, Sage, London.

Carlsnaes, W., Sjursen, H., White, B. (eds.) (2004), Contemporary European Foreign Policy, Sage, London.

Checkel, J. T. (1998), “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations”, en World Politics, 50: 2, 324 – 348.

Coleman, W. D., Underhill, G. R. D. (1998), Regionalism & Global Economic Integration. Europe, Asia and the Americas, Routledge, London, New York.

Cox, R. (1981), “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory”, en Millenium, Journal of International Studies, 10:2, 126 - 156.

Cox, R. W. (ed.) (1997), The New Realism. Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris.

Cox, R. W., Sinclair, T. J. (eds.) (1996), Approaches to world order, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Cox, R. W. (1996) (1981), “Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory”, en R. W. Cox, T. J. Sinclair (eds.), Approaches to world order, 85 – 123.

Cox, R. W. (1995), “Critical Political Economy”, en B. Hettne (ed.), International Political Economy, 31 –45. Czempiel, E.-O., Rosenau, J. N. (eds.), Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to the World Politics for the 1990s, Lexington Books, Lexington.

Daase, C. (1993), “Regionalisierung der Sicherheitspolitik – Eine Einführung” [La regionalización de la política de seguridad – una introducción], en C. Daase, S. Feske, B. Moltmann, C. Schmid (eds.), Regionalisierung der Sicherheitspolitik, 67 – 87.

Daase, C., Feske, S., Moltmann, B., Schmid, C. (1993), Regionalisierung der Sicherheitspolitik [La regionalización de la política de seguridad], Nomos, Baden-Baden.

Der Derian, J. (ed.) (1995), International Theory. Critical Investigations, Macmillan, Houndmills.

Dessler, D. (1999), “Constructivism within a positivist social science”, en Review of International Studies, 25:1, 123 – 137.

Dessler, D. (1989), “What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?”, en International Organization, 4:3, 443– 466.

Deutsch, K. et al. (1957), Political Community and the North Atlantic Area, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Dicken, P. (1998), Global Shift. The Internationalization of Economic Activities, 3a edición, Guilford Press, London.

Dunne, T. J. (1995), “The Social Construction of International Society”, en European Journal of International Relations, 1:3, 367 – 389.

Edwards, G. (1990), “The relevance of theory to group-to group dialogue”, en G. Edwards, E. Regelsberger (eds.), Europe’s Global Links, 201 – 218.

Edwards, G., Regelsberger, E. (eds.) (1990), Europe’s Global Links, Pinter, London.

Fabbri, C. (2005), The Constructivist Promise and Regional Integration. An answer to “old” an “new” puzzles.The Southamerican case, CSGR Working Paper no. 182/05, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick.

Faust, J. (2004), “Blueprint for an Interregional Future? The European Union and the Southern Cone”, en V. K. Aggarwal, E. A. Fogarty (eds.), EU Trade Strategies. Between Regionalism and Globalism, 41 – 63.

Fawcett, L., Hurrell, A. (eds.) (1995), Regionalism in World Politics. Regional Organization and International Order, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Fearon, J. D., Wendt, A. (2002), “Rationalism and Constructivism: A Sceptical View”, en W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, B. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, 52 – 72.

Finnemore, M., Sikkink, K. (1998), “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change”, en International Organization 52: 4, 887 – 917.

Freres, C., Pacheco, K. (eds.) (2004), Desafíos para una nueva asociación. Encuentros y desencuentros entre Europa y América Latina, Catarata, Madrid.

Fürst, D. (1995), “Region/ Regionalismos” [Región/ regionalismo], en D. Nohlen, R.-O. Schulte (eds.), Lexikon der Politik, Bnd. 1, Politische Theorien, 540.

Gamble, A. (2001), “Regional Blocs, World Order and the New Medievalism”, en M. Telò (ed.), European Union and new regionalism: Regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era, 21 – 38.

Gamble, A., Payne, A. (1996) (eds.), Regionalism and World Order, Macmillan Press, London.

Giddens, A. (1995) [1984], La constitución de la sociedad. Bases para la teoría de la estructuración, Amorrortu editors, Buenos Aires (Título de la edición original en inglés: The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Polity Press, Cambridge).

Giddens, A. (1982), Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory, University of California Press, Berkely.

Gill, S. (1995), “Theorizing the Interregnum: The Double Movement and Global Politics in the 1990s”, en B. Hettne (ed.), International Political Economy, 65 – 99.

Gilpin, R. (1987), The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Gilson, J. (2002), Asia meets Europe. Interregionalism and the Asia-Europe Meeting, Edward Elgar Publishing, Chultenham.

Gilson, J. (2002a), Defining Inter-Regionalism. The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), SEAS Electronic Working Papers, 1:1, University of Scheffield.

Grieco, J. M. (1993), “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism”, en D. A. Baldwin (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism. The Contemporary Debate, 116 – 140.

Grisanti, L. X. (2004), El nuevo Interregionalismo trasatlántico. La asociación estratégica Unión Europea – América Latina, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Departamento de Integración y Programas Regionales. www.iadb.org/intal/publicaciones/Grisanti_DD-IECI-04.pdf.

Grugel, J. B. (2004), “La Unión Europea y América Latina: Interregionalismo, identidad y gobernabilidad”, en C. Freres, K. Pacheco (eds.), Desafíos para una nueva asociación. Encuentros y desencuentros entre Europa y América Latina, 129 – 158.

Grugel, J. B. (2004a), “New Regionalism and Modes of Governance - Comparing EU and US Strategies in Latin America”, en European Journal of International Relations, Vol 10 (4), 603 – 626.

Grugel, J. (2002), España, la Unión Europea y América Latina: gobierno e identidad en la creación del “nuevo interregionalismo”, Documento de trabajo del Real Instituto Elcano de Estudios Internacionales y Estratégicos, 8.11., Madrid.

Grugel, J., Hout, W. (eds.) (1999), Regionalism Across the North-South Divide. State Strategies and Globalization, Routledge, London.

Grugel, J., Hout, W. (1999), “Regions, regionalism and the South”, en J. Grugel, W. Hout (eds.), Regionalism Across the North-South Divide. State Strategies and Globalization, 3 – 13.

Grugel, J., Almeida Mederos, M. de (1999b), “Brazil and Mercosur”, en J. Grugel, W. Hout, Regionalism Across the North-South Divide. State Strategies and Globalization, 46 – 61.

Grugel, J. (1996), “Latin America and the Remaking of the Americas”, en A. Gamble, A. Payne (eds.), Regionalism and World Order, 131 – 168.

Haas, P. (1992), Knowledge, Power; and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, edición especial, 46:1.

Habermas, J. (1987), Teoría de la acción comunicativa, I: Racionalidad de la acción y racionalización social, Taurus, Madrid.

Habermas, J. (1983), Moralbewuβtsein und kommunikatives Handeln [Conciencia moral y acción comunicativa], Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

Habermas, J. (1981), Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Teoría de la acción comunicativa], 2 Bände [2 volúmenes]. Band I: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung [Racionalidad de la acción y racionalización social]; Band II: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

Hanson, B. T. (1998), “What happened to Fortress Europe? External Trade Policy Liberalization in the European Union”, en International Organization, 52:1, 55 – 85.

Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., Rittberger, V. (eds.) (1997), Theories of International Regimes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., Perraton, J. (1999), Global Transformations. Politics, Economics and Culture, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Hellmann, G., Wolf, K. D., Zürn, M. (2003), Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland [Las nuevas Relaciones Internacionales. Estado del debate y perspectivas en Alemania], Nomos, Baden-Baden.

Hettne, B. (2004), “Interregionalism and World Order”, paper presented to Section 33, States, regions and regional world orders, SGIR, Fifth Pan-European International Relations Conference, Netherlands Congress Centre, the Hague, September 9-11.

Hettne, B., Inotai, A., Sunkel, O. (2000) (eds.), National Perspectives on the New Regionalism in the South. The New Regionalism Series (UNU/WIDER international research project on the New Regionalism), Vol. 3., Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke.

Hettne, B., Inotai, A., Sunkel, O. (1999) (eds.), Globalism and the New Regionalism. The New Regionalism Series (UNU/WIDER international research project on the New Regionalism), Vol. 1, Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke.

Hettne, B. (1999a), “The New Regionalism: A Prologue”, en B. Hettne et al. (eds.), Globalism and the New Regionalism, 15 - 29.

Hettne, B. (1999b), “Globalization and the New Regionalism. The Second Great Transformation”, en B. Hettne et al. (eds.), Globalism and the New Regionalism, 1 – 24.

Hettne, B. (1997), “The Double Movement: global market versus regionalism”, en R. W. Cox (ed.), The New Realism. Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order, 223 – 244.

Hettne, B. (ed.) (1995), International Political Economy. Understanding Global Disorder, Fernwood Publishing, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Hettne, B. (1995a), “The International Political Economy of Transformation”, en B. Hettne (ed.), International Political Economy, 1 – 30.

Herborth, B. (2004), “Die via media als konstitutionstheoretische Einbahnstraße. Zur Entwicklung des Akteur-Struktur-Problems bei Alexander Wendt” [La vía media como calle sin salida en términos de teoría constitutiva. Acerca del desarrollo del problema estructura agente de Alexander Wendt], en Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 11: 1, 61 – 87.

Higgott, R. (1994), “Ideas, Interests and Identity in the Asia Pacific”, en The Pacific Review, 7:4, 367 – 380.

Hirst, P., Thompson, G. (1999), Globalization in question, 2ª edición, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Holland, M. (2002), The European Union and the Third World, Palgrave, Houndmills, New York.

Hollis, M., Smith, S. (1990), Explaining and understanding International Relations, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Hout, W. (1999), “Theories of international relations and the new regionalism”, en J. Grugel, W. Hout (eds.), Regionalism Across the North-South Divide. State Strategies and Globalization, 14 – 28.

Hummel, H., Menzel, U. (2005), “Regionalisierung/ Regionalismos” [Regionalización/ regionalismo], en W. Woyte, Handbuch Internationale Politik, 422 - 431.

Hurrell, A. (1995), “Regionalism in theoretical perspective”, en L. Fawcett, A. Hurrell (eds.), Regionalism in World Politics, 37 – 73.

Hurrell, A. (1995a), “Explaining the resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics”, en Review of International Studies, 21 (4), 331 – 358.

Hänggi, H., Roloff, R., Rüland, J. (2006), Interregionalism and international relations, Routledge, London, New York.

Hänggi, H. (2002), “Interregionalism in Comparative Perspectiva” (1. draft), Paper prepared for the international conference on “Interregional Relations” at the University of Freiburg, Germany, 31 January/ 1 February.

Hänggi, H. (2000), “Interregionalism: empirical and theoretical perspectivas”, paper prepared for the workshop Dollars, Democracy and Trade: External Influence on Economic Integration in the Americas, Los Angeles, California, May 18, The Pacific Council on International Policy.

Hänggi, H. (1998), “Sozialer Konstruktivismus als goldene Brücke. Zur jüngsten Theoriedebatte in der Disziplin der Internationalen Beziehungen” [El socialconstructivismo como puente dorado. Acerca del debate doctrinal más reciente en la disciplina de las Relaciones Internacionales], en Bulletin der Schweizerischen Akademie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften, 1, 32 – 41.

Hveem, H. (2000), “Explaining the Regional Phenomena in an Era of Globalization”, en R. Stubbs, G. R. D. Underhill (eds.), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, 70 – 81.

Hveem, H. (1999), “Political Regionalism: Master or Servant of Economic Internationalization?”, en B. Hettne et al. (eds.), Globalism and the New Regionalism, 85 - 115.

Hülsse, R. (2003), “Sprache ist mehr als Argumentation. Zur wirklichkeitskonstituierenden Rolle von Metaphern”, [El lenguaje es más que argumentar. Acerca del papel de la metáfora en la constitución de la realidad], en Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 211 – 246.

Jachtenfuchs, M. (1995), “Ideen und Internationale Beziehungen” [Ideas y Relaciones Internacionales], en Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 2:2, 417 – 422.

Jaguaribe, H., Vasconcelos, A. de (eds.) (2003), The European Union, Mercosul and the New World Order, Frank Cass, London.

Jayasuriya, K. (1994), “Singapore: The Politics of Regional Definition”, en The Pacific Review, 7 (4), 411 –420.

Katzenstein, P. (1996), The Culture of National Security, Columbia University Press, New York.

Keck, O. (1995), “Rationales kommunikatives Handeln in den internationalen Beziehungen. Ist eine Verbindung von Rational-Choice-Theorie und Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns möglich?” [La acción racional comunicativa en las relaciones internacionales. ¿Es posible ligar la teoría del rational choice con la teoría de la acción comunicativa de Habermas?], en Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 2:1, 5– 48.

Kegley, C. W., Wittkopf, E. R. (1995), World Politics. Trends and Transformation, 5ª edición, St. Martin’s Press, New York.

Keohane, R. O., Martin, L. L. (1995), “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory”, en International Security, 20: 1, 39 – 51.

Keohane, R. O. (1989), International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory, Westview, Boulder.

Keohane, R. O. (1989a), “The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Economic Regimes, 1967 – 1977”, en R. O. Keohane, International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory, 74 – 100.

Keohane, R. O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Keohane, R. O., Nye, J. S. (1977), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Little, Brown, Boston.

Kindleberger, C. P. (1973), The World in Depression 1929 – 39, University of California Press, Berkely.

Koslowski, R., Kratochwil, F. (1995), “Understanding Change in International Politics: The Soviet Empire’s Demise and the International System”, en R. N. Lebow, T. Risse-Kappen (eds.), International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War, 127 – 165.

Krasner, S. D. (ed.) (1983), International Regimes, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Krasner, S. D. (1983a), “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables”, en S. D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, 1 – 21.

Krasner, S. D. (1982), “American Policy and Global Economic Stability”, en W. P. Avery, D. P. Rapkin (eds.), America in a Changing World Political Economy, 29 – 48.

Krasner, S. D. (1978), Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Krasner, S. D. (1976), “State Power and the Structure of International Trade”, en World Politics, 28, 3, 317 – 347.

Kratochwil, F. (1989), Rules, Norms and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affaire, University Press, Cambridge.

Kratochwil, F., Ruggie, J. G. (1986), “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State”, en International Organization, 40, 753 - 775.

Krell, G. (2004), Weltbilder und Weltordnung. Einführung in die Theorie der Internationalen Beziehungen [Visiones del mundo y orden mundial: Introducción en la teoría de las relaciones internacionales], 3a edición actualizada, Nomos, Baden-Baden.

Kulbálková, V., Onuf, N. G., Kowert, P. (eds.) (1998), International Relations in a constructed world, M. E. Sharpe, London, New York.

Lasswell, H. (1972), “Future Systems of Identity in the World Community”, en C. E. Black, R. A. Falk (eds.), The Future of International Legal Order, vol. 4.

Lamy, P. (2002), “Stepping Stones or Stumbling Blocks? The Eu’s Approach Towards the problem of Multilateralism vs Regionalism in Trade Policy”, en The World Economy, Vol. 25, 1399 – 1413.

Lloyd, P. J. (1992), Regionalisation and World Trade, OECD Economic Studies 18 (Spring).

Lähteenmäki, K., Käkönen, J. (1999), “Regionalization and its impact on the Theory of International Relations”, en B. Hettne et al. (eds.), Globalism and the New Regionalism, 203 - 227.

Marchand, M. H., Bøas, M., Shaw, T. M. (1999), “The political economy of new regionalisms”, en Third World Quarterly, 20:5, 897 – 910.

Mayer, P. (2003), «Die Epistemologie der Internationalen Beziehungen: Anmerkungen zum Stand der “Dritten Debatte”» [La epistemología de las Relaciones Internacionales: acerca del “tercer debate”], en G. Hellmann et al., Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen, 47 – 98.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (1995), “The False Promise of International Institutions”, en International Security, 19:3, 5 – 49.

Memedovic, O., Kuyvenhoven, A., Molle, W. T. M. (eds.) (1999), Multilateralism and Regionalism in the Post-Uruguay Round Era. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London.

Memedovic, O., Kuyvenhoven, A., Molle, W. T. M. (1999), “Economics and Politics of the EU-Route Towards Global Free Trade”, en O. Memedovic, A. Kuyvenhoven, W. T.M. Molle (eds.), Multilateralism and Regionalism in the Post-Uruguay Round Era, 3 – 30.

Menzel, U. (2001), Zwischen Idealismus und Realismus. Die Lehre von den Internationalen Beziehungen [Entre idealismo y realismo], Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

Meyers, R. (2005), “Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen” [Teorías de las Relaciones Internacionales], en W. Woyte, Handbuch Internationale Politik, 450 – 482.

Meyers, R. (2005b), “Theorien internationaler Kooperation und Verflechtung” [Teorías de la cooperación internacional], en W. Woyte, Handbuch Internationale Politik, 482 - 515.

Mittelmann, J., Falk, R. (2000), “Global Hegemony and Regionalism”, en S. C. Calleya, Regionalism in the Post-Cold War World, 3 – 22.

Mittelmann, J. (1999), “Rethinking the ‘New Regionalism’ in the Context of Globalization”, en B. Hettne et al. (eds.), Globalism and the New Regionalism, 25 – 53.

Müller, H. (1995), “Spielen hilft nicht immer”, en Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 2:2, 371 – 391.

Müller, H. (1994), “Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln. Zur Kritik der utilitaristischen Handlungstheorien”, en Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 1:1, 15 – 44.

Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet, G. (2000), “Perspectives for a New Regionalism: Relations between the EU and Mercosur”, en European Affairs Review, 5, 561 – 579.

Mols, M. (2001/2002), “Bemerkungen zur Globalisierung in Lateinamerika und in Ostasien” [Reflexiones acerca de la globalización en América Latina y Asia del Este],en W. Zippel (ed.), Die Beziehungen zwischen der EU und den Mercosur-Staaten. Stand und Perspektiven, 45 – 56.

Nohlen, D., Schulte, R.-O. (eds.) (1995), Lexikon der Politik, Bnd. 1, Politische Theorien, Beck, München.

Nunnenkamp, P. (2001/2002), “Die EU-Osterweiterung als Bedrohung, die Entwicklungspartnerschaft als Chance? Lateinamerika im regionalen Beziehungsgeflecht der EU” [La ampliación al este como amenaza, la asociación estratégica como posibilidad? América Latina en las relaciones regionales de la UE], en W. Zippel (ed.), Die Beziehungen zwischen der EU und den Mercosur-Staaten. Stand und Perspektiven, 137 – 155.

Onuf, N. G. (1989), World of our making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina.

Oye, K. A. (ed.) (1986), Cooperation under Anarchy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Patten, C. (2002), “Forward to the EU-LAC Madrid Summit”, Madrid, 17 - 18 May. http://www.europa.eu/int/comm/world/lac.

Phillips, N. (2003), “Hemispheric Integration and subregionalism in the Americas”, en International Affairs, 79, 2, 327 – 349.

Phillips, N. (2003), “The rise and fall of open regionalism? Comparative reflections on regional governance in the Southern Cone of Latin America”, en Third World Quarterly, 24:2, 217-234.

Phillips, N. (2001), “Regionalist governance in the new political economy of development: 'relaunching' the Mercosur”, en Third World Quarterly, vol 22, No 4, 565-583.

Popper, K. R. (1976), Logik der Forschung [Lógica de la investigación científica], 6ª edición, Mohr, Tübingen. Rengger, N. J. (1996), “On Cosmopolitanism, Constructivism and International Society. Some Reflections on British International Studies at the Fin de siècle”, en Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 3:1, 183 – 1999.

Risse, T. (2004), “Social Constructivism and European Integration”, en A. Wiener, T. Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 159 – 196.

Risse, T. (2003), “Konstruktivismus, Rationalismus und Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen – warum empirisch nichts so heiß gegessen wird, wie es theoretisch gekocht wurde” [Constructivismo, racionalismo y teorías de las Relaciones Internacionales – porque empíricamente nada se come tan caliente como teoréticamente se ha cocinado 157], en G. Hellmann et al., Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen, 99 – 131.

Robles, A. Jr. (2004), The political economy of interregional relations: ASEAN and the EU, Ashgate, Aldershot.

Roloff, R. (2002), “Interregionalism and International Politics. Theoretical Introduction and State of the Art (1. draft)”, paper prepared for the international conference on Interregional Relations at the University of Freiburg, Germany, 31 January/ 1 February.

Rosamond, B. (1998), “The cultural dimension of Asia-Europe dialogues: a European perspectiva”, paper presented at the conference ASEM at the Crossroads: Retrospect and Prospect for Euro-Asia relations, First Yonsei-Warwick ASEM Conference, Seoul 9 - 10 November.

Rosenau, J. N. (1997), “The Person, The Household, the Community, and the Globe: notes for a theory of multilateralism in a turbulent world”, en R. W. Cox (ed.), The New Realism. Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order, 57 – 82.

Rosenau, J. N. (1995), “Distant Proximities: The Dynamics and Dialectics of Globalization”, en B. Hettne (ed.), International Political Economy, 46 – 64.

Rosenau, J. N. (1990), Turbulence in World Politics. A Theory of Change and Continuity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Rosenau, J. N. (1990), Turbulence in World Politics. A Theory of Change and Continuity, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.

Ruggie, J. G. (1998), Constructing the World Polity. Essays on international institutionalization, Routledge, New York.

Ruggie, J. G. (1998a), “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge”, en International Organization, 52:4, 855 - 885.

Ruggie, J. G. (1975), “International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends”, en International Organization, 29, 557 – 583.

Russett, B. (1963), Community and Contention, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Rüland, J. (2002), “Interregionalism in International Relations. Conference Summary”, Workshop sponsored by the Foundation Volkswagen, held at the Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institute, Freiburg, Germany on 31 January and 1 February.

Rüland, J. (2001), ASEAN and the European Union. A Bumpy Interregional Relationship, Discussion Paper C35, Zentrum für Europäische Integrationsforschung, Bonn.

Rüland, J. (1999), “The EU as Inter-Regional Actor: The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM)”, paper prepared for the International Conference Asia-Europe on the Eve of the 21st Century, Bangkok, 19-20 August.

Salomón, M. (2001/ 2002), “La teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales en los albores del siglo XXI: diálogo, disidencia, aproximaciones”, en Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 56, 7 – 52.

Sanahuja, J. A. (2004), “Un diálogo estructurado y plural. La dimensión institucional de las relaciones Unión Europea – América Latina”, en Nueva Sociedad, 189.

Sanchez Bajo, C. (1999), “The European Union and Mercosur: a case of inter-regionalism”, en Third World Quarterly, Vol. 20, No 5, 927 – 941.

Santander, S. (2005), “The European Partnership with Mercosur: a Relationship Based on Strategic and Neoliberal Principles”, en Journal of European Integration, 27/ 3, 285 – 306.

Santander, S. (2002), “EU-Mercosur Interregionalism: Facing Up to the South American Crisis and the Emerging Free Trade Area of the Americas”, en European Foreign Affairs Review, 7, 491 – 505.

Sampson, G. P., Woolcock, S. (eds.) (2003), Regionalism Multilateralism and Economic Integration. The Recent Experience, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris.

Schirm, S. A. (1999), Globale Märkte, nationale Politik und regionale Kooperation in Europa und den Amerikas [Mercados globales, política nacional y cooperación regional en Europa y las Américas], Nomos, Baden-Baden.

Sinclair, T. J. (1996), “Beyond international relations theory: Robert W. Cox and approaches to world order”, en R. W. Cox, T. J. Sinclair (eds.), Approaches to world order, 3 – 37.

Söderbaum, F., Stålgren, P., Langenhove, L. (2005), “The EU as a Global Actor and the Dynamics of Interregionalism: a Comparative Analysis”, en Journal of European Integration, 27/ 3, 365 – 380.

Stubbs, R., Underhill, G. R. D. (eds.) (2002), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Strange, S. (1997), “Territory, State, Authority and Economy: a new realist ontology of global political economy”, en R. W. Cox (ed.), The New Realism. Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order, 3 - 19.

Strange, S. (1988), States and Markets. An Introduction to International Political Economy, Pinter, London.

Telò, M. (2006), Europe: A Civilian Power? European Union, Global Governance, World Order, Macmillan, Palgrave.

Telò, M. (ed.) (2001), European Union and new regionalism: Regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era (The international political economy of new regionalisms), Ashgate, Aldershot.

Telò, M. (2001a), “Between Trade Regionalisation and Deep Integration”, en M. Telò (ed.), European Union and new regionalism: Regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era, 71 – 98.

Telò, M. (2001b), “Reconsiderations: Three Scenarios”, en M. Telò (ed.), European Union and new regionalism: Regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era, 247 - 274.

Tussie, D., Woods, N. (2000), Trade, Regionalism and the Thread to Multilateralism.

Vasconcelos, À. de (2003), “The European Union and the New Multilateralism”, en H. Jaguaribe, A. de Vasconcelos (eds.), The European Union, Mercosur and the New World Order, 29 – 45.

Vasconcelos, À. de (2001), “European Union and Mercosur", en M. Telò (ed.), European Union and new regionalism: Regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era, 135 – 152.

Ventura, D. (2005), Las asimetrías entre el Mercosur y la Unión Europea. Los desafíoa de una asociación interregional, Fundación Konrad Adenauer (KAS), Montevideo, Programa de Estado de Derecho para Sudamérica.

Vieira Posada, E. (2004), La integración de América Latina: del Congreso Anfictiónico de Panamá en 1826 a una Comunidad Latinoamericana o Sudamericana de Naciones en el año 2010, Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá.

Waltz, K. (1995), “Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory”, en C. W. Kegley, Controversies in International Relations Theory, 67 – 82.

Waltz, K. (1979), Theory of International Politics,Addison – Wesley, Boston.

Waltz, K. (1959), Man, the State and War, Columbia University Press, New York.

Weber, M. (1988) [1904], Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, editado por Johannes Winckelmann, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.

Weber, M. (1988a) [1904], «Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis», en M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, 146 – 214.

Weber, M. (1984) [1904], “La objetividad del conocimiento en las ciencias y la política sociales”, en M. Weber, La acción social. Ensayos metodológicos, 112 – 190.

Weber, M. (1984) [1904], La acción social. Ensayos metodológicos, traducción del alemán de M. Faber-Kaiser y S. Giner, Ediciones Península, Barcelona.

Wendt, A. (1999), Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Wendt, A. (1994), “Collective identity formation and the international state”, en American Political Science Review, 88, 384 – 396.

Wendt, A. (1992), “Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics”, en International Organization, 46, 391 – 425.

Wendt, A., Duvall, R. (1989), “Institutions and International order”, en E.-O. Czempiel, J. N. Rosenau (eds.), Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to the World Politics for the 1990s, 51 – 73.

Wiener, A. (2003), “Die Wende zum Dialog: Konstruktivistische Brückenstationen und ihre Zukunft”, en G. Hellmann et al., Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen, 133 – 250.

Wiener, A., Diez, T. (2004), European Integration Theory, Oxford.

Woyte, W. (ed.) (2005), Handwörterbuch Internationale Politik [Enciclopedia Política Internacional], 9a edición actualizada, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.

Zehfuß, M. (1998), “Sprachlosigkeit schränkt ein. Zur Bedeutung von Sprache in konstruktivistischen Theorien” [La incompetencia comunicativa perjudica. Acerca de la importancia del lenguaje en teorías constructivistas], en Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 5:1, 109 – 137.

Zippel, W. (ed.) (2001/2002), Die Beziehungen zwischen der EU und den Mercosur-Staaten. Stand und Perspektiven [Las relaciones entre la UE y los Estados del Mercosur. Estado y Perspectivas], Schriftenreihe des Arbeitskreises Europäische Integration e.V. Band 48, Nomos, Baden-Baden.

Zürn, M. (1992), Interessen und Institutionen in der internationalen Politik. Grundlegung und Anwendung des situationsstrukturellen Ansatzes [Intereses e instituciones en la política internacional], Leske + Budrich, Opladen.

Deposited On:24 Oct 2011 06:53
Last Modified:06 Feb 2014 09:49

Repository Staff Only: item control page