Biblioteca de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid

How Should Journal Quality be Ranked? An Application to Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics

Impacto



Chang, Chia-Lin y McAleer, Michael (2011) How Should Journal Quality be Ranked? An Application to Agricultural, Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics. [ Documentos de Trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE); nº 39, 2011, ] (Presentado)

[img]
Vista previa
PDF
Creative Commons License
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - No comercial.

260kB

URL Oficial: http://eprints.ucm.es/14083/




Resumen

The Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science citations database (hereafter ISI) category of Economics has one of the largest numbers of journals, at 304, of any ISI discipline, and hence has wide coverage. The paper analyses the leading international journals in the Economics sub-disciplines of Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics using quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAMs), and highlights the similarities and differences in alternative RAMs. The RAMs are based on alternative transformations of citations taken from the ISI database. Alternative RAMs may be calculated annually or updated daily to answer the perennial questions as to When, Where and How (frequently) published papers are cited (see Chang et al. (2011a, b, c)). The RAMs include the most widely used RAM, namely the classic 2-year impact factor including journal self citations (2YIF), 2-year impact factor excluding journal self citations (2YIF*), 5-year impact factor including journal self citations (5YIF), Immediacy (or zero-year impact factor (0YIF)), Eigenfactor, Article Influence, C3PO (Citation Performance Per Paper Online), h-index, PI-BETA (Papers Ignored - By Even The Authors), 2-year Self-citation Threshold Approval Ratings (2Y-STAR), Historical Self-citation Threshold Approval Ratings (H-STAR), Impact Factor Inflation (IFI), and Cited Article Influence (CAI). As data are not available for 5YIF, Article Influence and CAI for one of the 20 journals considered, 13 RAMs are analysed for 19 highly-cited journals in Energy, Environmental and Resource Economics in the ISI category of Economics. Harmonic mean rankings of the 13 RAMs for the 19 highly-cited journals are also presented. It is shown that emphasizing the 2-year impact factor of a journal, which partly answers the question as to When published papers are cited, to the exclusion of other informative RAMs, which answer Where and How (frequently) published papers are cited, can lead to a distorted evaluation of journal impact and influence relative to the Harmonic Mean rankings.


Tipo de documento:Documento de trabajo o Informe técnico
Palabras clave:Research assessment measures, Impact factor, IFI, C3PO, PI-BETA, STAR, Eigenfactor, Article Influence, h-index.
Materias:Ciencias Sociales > Biblioteconomía y Documentación > Bases de datos
Ciencias Sociales > Economía > Econometría
Ciencias Sociales > Biblioteconomía y Documentación > Recuperación de la información
Ciencias Sociales > Biblioteconomía y Documentación > Gestión de la información
JEL:Q10, Q20, Q30, Q40, Q50
Título de serie o colección:Documentos de Trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
Volumen:2011
Número:39
Código ID:14083
Referencias:

Bergstrom C. (2007), Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals, C&RL News, 68, 314-316.

Bergstrom, C.T. and. J.D. West (2008), Assessing citations with the Eigenfactor™ metrics, Neurology, 71, 1850–1851.

Bergstrom, C.T., J.D. West and M.A. Wiseman (2008), The Eigenfactor™ metrics, Journal of Neuroscience, 28(45), 11433–11434 (November 5, 2008).

Chang, C.-L. and M. McAleer (2011), Citations and impact of ISI tourism and hospitality journals, to appear in Tourism Management Perspectives.

Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011a), What makes a great journal great in economics? The singer not the song, Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(2), 326-361.

Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011b), What makes a great journal great in the sciences? Which came first, the chicken or the egg?, Scientometrics, 87(1), 17-40.

Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011c), Great expectatrics: Great papers, great journals, great econometrics, Econometric Reviews, 30(6), 583-619.

Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2011d), How are journal impact, prestige and article influence related? An application to neuroscience, Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(11), 2563-2573.

Fersht, A. (2009), The most influential journals: Impact factor and Eigenfactor, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(17), 6883-6884 (April 28, 2009).

Hirsch, J.E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-15572 (November 15, 2005).

ISI Web of Science (2011), Journal Citation Reports, Essential Science Indicators, Thomson Reuters ISI.

Seglen, P.O. (1997), Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, BMJ: British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 498-502.

Depositado:29 Dic 2011 12:25
Última Modificación:17 Jun 2016 09:23

Sólo personal del repositorio: página de control del artículo