Complutense University Library

Características de la implantación de la pizarra digital interactiva en colegios de la Comunidad de Madrid


Soto Varela, Roberto (2011) Características de la implantación de la pizarra digital interactiva en colegios de la Comunidad de Madrid. [Trabajo Fin de Máster]



Ante la evidencia del potencial de renovación metodológica e innovación pedagógica que puede aportar la "pizarra digital interactiva" en las aulas de clase, este estudio tiene como objetivo aproximarse y profundizar en el conocimiento sobre esta herramienta, concretamente sobre las principales características que suceden al introducir la PDI en los centros. Todo ello desde la perspectiva de los sujetos a investigar, en este caso los alumnos y docentes, mediante la observación de ese contexto.
Los sujetos participantes fueron 10 profesores y 50 alumnos a los que se les realizaron unos cuestionarios de carácter abierto, y además a los docentes una entrevista.
[ABSTRACT] Before the evidence of the potential of methodological renovation and pedagogic innovation that can contribute the " interactive whiteboard " in the classrooms, one has as aim bring near and deepen this study in the knowledge on this tool, concretely The main features that occur when introducing the PDI in the schools. All this was investigated under the subject’s viewpoint to investigate. The fastened participants were 10 teachers and 50 pupils to those who carried out a few questionnaires of opened character and in addition an interview to the teachers.

Item Type:Trabajo Fin de Máster
DirectorsDirector email
Morcillo Ortega, Juan Gabriel
Uncontrolled Keywords:PDI, Renovación metodológica, Investigación educativa, Alumnos y docentes, IWB, Methodological renovation, Education research, Pupils and teachers
Subjects:Humanities > Education > Educational psychology
Humanities > Education > Pedagogy
Humanities > Education > Primary education
ID Code:16208

Arnseth, H.C.; Hatlevik, O.; Kløvstad. V. Kristiansen, T. y Ottestad, G. (2007). ITU Monitor 2007. Skolens digitale tilstand 2007. Oslo: Forsknings- kompetansenettverk for IT i utdanningen.

Badilla, M. G. (20010). Tesis Doctoral ”Análisis y evaluación de un modelo socioconstructivo de formación permanente del profesorado para la incorporación de las TIC”. Dirigida por el Doctor Jordi Riera Romaní. Barcelona. Universidad Ramón Llull.

Balanskat, A.; Blamire, R.; y Kefala S. (2006). The ICT Impact Report: A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. European Schoolnet. Disponible en:

Ball, B. (2003). "Teaching & learning mathematics with an interactive whiteboard", Micromaths, 19 4-7.

Barrera-Osorio, F.; y Linden, L. L. (2009). The use and misuse of computers in education: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Colombia. The World Bank. Policy Research Working Paper nº 4836

Beauchamp, G. and Parkinson, J. (2005). "Beyond the "wow" factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard", School Science Review, 86(316), 97-103.

Becta (2005). "Interactive whiteboards", produced by BECTA, Recuperado el 15 de marzo de 2011 de

Becta (2006). The Becta Review, Recuperado el 15 de marzo de 2011 de

Becta (2008). Harnessing Technology Review 2008: The role of technology and its impact on education. Full report November 2008

Beltran, D. O.; Das, K. K.; and Fairlie, R. W. (2008). Are Computers Good for Children? The Effects of Home Computers on Educational Outcomes.The Australian National University. Centre for Economic Policy Research. DISCUSSION PAPER No. 576. March 2008

Bennett, S., y Lockyer, L. (2008). A study of teachers' integration of interactive whiteboards into four Australian primary school classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 289-300. doi: 10.1080/17439880802497008.

Birch, J. (2005). "Using an electronic whiteboard". Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de

Bransford, J. D.; Brown, A. L.; and Cocking, R. R. eds. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Expanded edition. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.

Brown, S. (2004). "Interactive whiteboards in education", produced by Techlearn. Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de

Burns, C. and Myhill, D. (2004). "Interactive or inactive? A consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching", Cambridge Journal of Education, 34 35-49.

Chaptal A. (2007). « Usages prescrits ou annoncés, usages observés. Réflexion sur les usages scolaires du numérique par les enseignants. ». Document numérique, vol. 10, n° 3-4, p. 81–106. En ligne : < ... ;ID_ARTICLE=DN_103_0081>.

Cox, M., Webb, M., Abbott, B., Blakely, T., Beauchamp, T. and Watson, D. (2004). An investigation of the research evidence relating to ICT pedagogy, London: BECTA.

Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.

Edwards, J.-A., Hartnell, M. and Martin, R. (2002). "Interactive whiteboards: Some lessons from the classroom", Micromath, 30-33.

Empirica (2006). “Benchmarking Access and Use of ICT in European Schools”, Empirica, 2006. Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de

Eurydice (2004). “Key data on ICT in schools in Europe”. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit. Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 ce%20Key%20data%20on%20ICT%20in%20schools%20in%20Europe%22.

Eurydice (2005). “How boys and girls are finding their way with ICT?” Brussels: Eurydice European Unit. Recuperado el 7 de de marzo de 2011 de

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher Pedagogical Beliefs: The Final Frontier in Our Quest for Technology Integration?. Educational Technology, Research and Development. N.º 53 (4), pág. 25-40. Eurydice (2009). Key data on education in Europe.

Farrell, F. (2004). "Poetry with a whiteboard", The Secondary English Magazine, June 2004 14-17.

Ferl. (2005). "What is interactive teaching and learning?" produced by Ferl First: Technology for E-Learning. Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de

Ferrer, F.; Armengol, C.; Belvis, E. (2010). “Evaluación del programa pizarra digital en Aragón”. GAPEF Y GIPE, de la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.

Gatlin, M. (2004). "Interactive whiteboard system creates 'Active classrooms' for rural Georgia school system", produced by T.H.E. Journal Applications. Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de

Glover, D. and Miller, D. (2001). "Running with technology: the pedagogical impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school", Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257-276.

Glover, D. and Miller, D. (2002a). "The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogical change: The experience of 5 elementary schools in an English education authority", Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2002 5-19.

Glover, D. and Miller, D. (2002b). "The introduction of interactive whiteboards into schools in the UK: Leaders, led and the management of pedagogical change", International electronic journal for leadership in learning, 6(24).

Glover, D. and Miller, D. (2004a). "Matching technology & pedagogy in teaching mathematics: understanding fractions using a 'virtual manipulative' fraction wall". Recuperado el 7 de de marzo de 2011 de

Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models. 3rd edn. Hodder Arnold.

Goodison, T. (2002). "Learning with ICT at primary level: perceptions", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18 282-295.

Gossin, P. (2009). L'école n'est pas prête à passer au tout numérique. Entrevista realizada por Arnaud Bertrand en Liberation. 07/09/2009

Greiffenhagen, C. (2002). "Out of the office and into the school: electronic whiteboards for education", produced by Oxford University Computing Laboratory. Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de

Hall, I. and Higgins, S. (2005). "Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 102-117.

Harris, S. (2002) "Innovative pedagogical practices using ICT in schools in England", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18 449-458.

Harrison, C. et al. (2002). “ImpaCT2: The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Pupil Learning and Attainment”, UK: Becta. Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de .

Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., Mcfarlane, A., Mavers, D., Scrimshaw, P., Somekh, B. and Watling, R. (2003). ImpaCT2: The impact of information & communication technologies on pupil learning & attainment, Annesley, Nottinghamshire: DfES.

Higgins, S., Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F., Smith, H. and Wall, K. (2005). Embedding ICT in the Literacy & Numeracy Strategies: Final Report, Newcastle: University of Newcastle School of Education, Centre for Learning & Teaching,: pp. 1-pp. 1-73.

Hooper, S. and Rieber, L. (1995). "Teaching with technology", produced by A. Ornstein, Needham Heights, Mass, Allyn & Bacon. Recuperado el 7 de de marzo de 2011 de

Jarraud, F. (2009). Une efficacité prouvée mais pas démontrée. Le Café pédagogique nº 95

Jarraud, F. (2009). L'Ecole française hésite devant le numérique, révèle une enquête des Landes. L'Expresso du 15 Juillet 2009

Karsenti, T. et al., (2005). L’impact des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) sur la réussite éducative des garçons à risque de milieux défavorisés.

Kennewell, S. (2004). Researching the influence of interactive presentation tools on teachers' pedagogy, British Educational Research Association (BERA), Manchester, UK.

Kennewell, S. and Beauchamp, G. (2003). "The influence of a technology-rich classroom environment on elementary teachers' pedagogy and children's learning". In Wright, J., McDougall, A., Murnane, al. (Eds.) Young children and learning technologies, pp. 65-70, Sydney: Australian Computer Society.

Latham, P. (2002). "Teaching & learning primary mathematics: The impact of interactive whiteboards". Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de

Laws, K., y McLeod, R. (2004 July). Case study and grounded theory: Sharing some alternative qualitative research methodology with systems professionals. Artículo presentado a la 22nd International Conference of Systems Dynamics Society. Oxford, England. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de EO.pdf

Lawson, T. and Comber, C. (2000). "Introducing Information & Communication Technologies into Schools: the blurring of boundaries", British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(3), 419-433.

Lee, B. and Boyle, M. (2004). "Teachers tell their story: Interactive whiteboards at Richardson Primary School". Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de

Lee, M. and Boyle, M. (2003). "The educational effects & implications of the interactive whiteboard strategy of Richardson primary school: a brief review". Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de

Levy, P. (2002). "Interactive whiteboards in learning & teaching in 2 Sheffield schools: a developmental study". Recuperado 7 de marzo de 2011 de

Lewin, C., Mavers, D. and Somekh, B. (2003). "Broadening access to the curriculum through using technology to link home & school: A critical analysis of reforms intended to improve students' educational attainment", The Curriculum Journal, 14 23-53.

Lewis, H. (2003). "Using and interactive whiteboard in the daily mathematics lesson: Implications for teaching & learning", UWIC Education Papers, 2 41-52.

Machin, S.; McNally, S.; Olmo S. (2006). New Technology in Schools: Is There a Payoff?. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2234. July 2006

Marqués, P. (2002). La pizarra digital en los contextos educativos. Recuperado 4 de abril de 2010 de

Marquès, P. (2008). La pizarra digital. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de

Marquès, P., y Grupo DIM. (2000). La pizarra digital en el aula de clase. Barcelona: Grupo EDEBE. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de

Marquès, P. (Dir). (2010). Investigación: Aulatice 2009-2011. Informe julio 2010. Recuperado el 3 de octubre de 2010 de

Mccormick, R. and Scrimshaw, P. (2001). "Information & communications technology, knowledge & pedagogy", Education, Communication & Information, 1(1), 37-57.

Morrison, D. (2003). "From chalkface to interface - the impact of the interactive whiteboards in the history classroom”. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de

Network for IT-Research and Competence in Education (ITU) (2004). “Pilot: ICT and school development”, University of Oslo. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de .

OCDE (2005). Are Students Ready for a Technology-Rich World? What PISA Studies Tell Us. OECD. Paris

OCDE (2007). EDU Working Paper No. 38. EDU/WKP(2009)17

OCDE (2008). Informe PISA 2003 y 2006. Competencias científicas para el mundo del mañana. Ed. Santillana.

OCDE (2008). New millennium learners: a project in progress optimising learning: implications of learning sciences research. OECD. Paris

OCDE (2009). Green at Fifteen?. How 15-year-olds perform in environmental science and geoscience in PISA 2006. OECD. Paris

OFSTED (2004). "Interactive whiteboards". Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de

OFSTED (2006). The Annual Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector 2006/07. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de

Pearson, M., Haldane, M. and Somekh, B. (2004). St Thomas of Aquin's Interactive Whiteboard pilot, Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University. Scottish Executive.

Pelgrum, W.J.; y Law, N. (2004). Les TIC et l’éducation dans le monde : tendances, en-jeux et perspectives. IIPE/UNESCO. Paris

Peraya, D. (2002). Communication et nouvelles technologies . In P. Perrig Chiello & F. Darbellay (dir.), Qu’est-ce que l’interdisciplinarité ? Les nouveaux défis de l’enseignement. Lausanne : Institut Universitaire Kurt Bösch, p. 117-143.

Poyet, F. ; avec la collaboration de Michèle Drechsler (2009). Impact des TIC dans l’enseignement : une alternative pour l’individualisation? Dossier d’actualité de la VST, n° 41 - janvier 2009.

Ramboll Management (2005). “Evaluation of ITMF: Overall Results”, Denmark: UNI•C. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de .

Ramboll Management (2006). “Elearning Nordic 2006: Impact of ICT on Education”, Denmark: Ramboll Management. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de arch=%22Elearning%20Nordic%202006%22.

Sheppard, B. (2003). "Leadership, organizational learning and the successful integration of information & communication technology in teaching & learning", International electronic journal for leadership in learning, 7(14).

Sigalés, C.; Mominó, J. M.; Meneses, J.; Badia, A. (2008). La integración de internet en la educación escolar española: situación actual y perspectivas de futuro. Informe de investigación. Julio de 2008. UOC/Telefónica

Slay, H., Siebörger, I., y Hodgkinson-Williams, Ch. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just ‘‘lipstick”? Computers & Education, 51, 1321–1341. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.12.006

Smith, F., Hardman, F. and Higgins, S. (2006a). "Gender inequality in the primary classroom: Will interactive whiteboards help?" Gender & Education, In press.

Smith, F., Hardman, F. and Higgins, S. (2006b). "The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy & Numeracy strategies", British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 443-457.

Smith, H. (2001). "SmartBoard evalucation: Final report". Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de

Smith, H. and Higgins, S. (2006). "Opening classroom interaction: The importance of feedback", Cambridge Journal of Education, In press.

Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K. and Miller, J. (2005). "Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 91-101.

Solvie, P. (2004). "The digital whiteboard: A tool in early literacy instruction", produced by The Reading Teacher 57(5): 484-487. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de

Somekh, B., Underwood, J., Convery, A., Dillon, G., Lewin, C., Mavers, D., Saxon, D. and Woodrow, D. (2005). Evaluation of the DfES ICT Test Bed Project, Annual Report 2004, Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA).

Somekh, B., Woodrow, S., Barnes, S., Triggs, P., Sutherland, R., Passey, D., Holt, H., Harrison, C., Fisher, T., Flett, A. and Joyes, G. (2002b). NGfL Pathfinders: Final report on the roll-out of the NGfL Programme in 10 Pathfinder LEAs: ICT in schools Research & Evaluation Series No. 11, Coventry: BECTA.

Tanner, H., Jones, S., Kennewell, S. and Beauchamp, G. (2005). Interactive whiteboards & pedagogies of whole class teaching, Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Conference 28, Melbourne: MERGA 28.

Toots, A. et al.; (2004). “Tiger in Focus: Executive Summary”, Tallinn: Estonian Tiger Leap Foundation. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de .

Tyldesley, A. and Turner, C. (2005). "Secondary school case studies of literacy & ICT". In Monteith, M. (Ed.) Teaching secondary school literacies with ICT, pp. 57-70, Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Underwood, J. (2005). “Impact of broadband in schools” UK: Nottingham TrentUniversity, Becta, June 2005. Recuperado 3 octubre de 2010 de

Venezky, R.L.; Davis, C. (2002). Quo vademus? The transformation of schooling in a networked world. Paris : OCDE/CERI

Walker, L.; Rockman, S.; Chessler, M. (1999). A More Complex Picture: Laptop Use and Impact in the Context of Changing Home and School Access. The third in a series of research studies on Microsoft’s Anytime Anywhere Learning Program. Rockman et al. San Francisco, CA.

Warwick, P., y Kershner, R. (2008). Primary teachers' understanding of the interactive whiteboard as a tool for children's collaborative learning and knowledge building. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(4), 269-287.

Deposited On:11 Dec 2012 08:51
Last Modified:07 Feb 2014 09:25

Repository Staff Only: item control page