Universidad Complutense de Madrid
E-Prints Complutense

Evaluation of Rotation and Visual Outcomes After Implantation of Monofocal and Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lenses



Último año

Garzón Jiménez, Nuria y Poyales, Francisco y Ortíz de Zárate, Begoña y Ruiz-García, José Luis y Quiroga, Juan Antonio (2015) Evaluation of Rotation and Visual Outcomes After Implantation of Monofocal and Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lenses. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 31 (2). pp. 90-97. ISSN 1081-597X

Vista previa

URL Oficial: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20150122-03


PURPOSE: To evaluate rotational stability and its influ-ence on postoperative visual acuity of different monofocal and multifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: A prospective interventional study was designed. Ninety-one patients with a mean age of 71.65 ± 11.82 years were implanted with toric IOLs after phacoemulsification. Three monofocal toric IOLs (the Lentis LT [Oculentis, Berlin, Germany], enVista [Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY], and AcrySof IQ [Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX]) and one multifocal toric IOL (AcrySof IQ ReSTOR; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) were implanted. Preoperative and postoperative images were taken to calculate the misalignment due to the marking method. To evaluate rotation in the different follow-up visits, another photograph was taken 1 hour and 1, 7 and 30 days postoperatively. Refraction, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corrected distance visual acuity were measured 30 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperative UDVA was 0.1 logMAR or better in 64.6% of eyes implanted with monofocal IOLs and 46.4% of eyes implanted with multifocal IOLs. The enVista toric IOL showed the best UDVA compared to the other monofocal IOLs, with 81% of eyes with 0.1 logMAR or better. The mean misalignment in the total group studied was 0.07° ± 0.60°; 69.6% of monofocal IOLs and 67.9% of multifocal IOLs showed less than 5° of rotation. A correlation was found between postoperative UDVA and rotation in the monofocal and multifocal IOLs implanted (r = 0.439 [P < .011] and = 0.787 [P = .001], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: At 1 month postoperatively, UDVA was slightly more affected by IOL rotation in multifocal than monofocal toric IOLs. The marking method was also effective.

Tipo de documento:Artículo
Información Adicional:

Este documento es un postprint.

Palabras clave:Lens Implantation; Astigmatism; Cataract Surgery; Clinical outcomes; Silicone; Eyes; Shrinkage; Phacoemulsification; Visual Acuity; Prosthesis Desing; Pseudophakia
Materias:Ciencias Biomédicas > Medicina > Cirugía
Ciencias Biomédicas > Medicina > Oftalmología
Ciencias Biomédicas > Óptica y optometría > Lentes de contacto
Ciencias Biomédicas > Óptica y optometría > Óptica oftálmica
Código ID:31303
Depositado:06 Jul 2015 07:56
Última Modificación:12 Mar 2016 00:01

Descargas en el último año

Sólo personal del repositorio: página de control del artículo