Universidad Complutense de Madrid
E-Prints Complutense

The four 18th century streams on productive labour

Impacto

Descargas

Último año

Perrotta, Cosimo (2014) The four 18th century streams on productive labour. Iberian Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 1 (2). pp. 1-13. ISSN 2386-5768

[img]
Vista previa
PDF
407kB

URL Oficial: http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHE


URLTipo de URL
http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/IJHEInstitución


Resumen

This article first recalls our previous research on the original approach on productive labour, which goes from Petty to Genovesi (1767). That approach, being mainly empirical, divided jobs into more or less productive. The other most important approaches came later: Quesnay founded productive labour on surplus, Condillac on utility, Smith on exchange value. All of them gave the concept a more rigorous, but also more rigid shape: jobs were divided into productive or unproductive once and for all. Moreover social utility and productive nature of labour became separated qualities. Smith’s concern was to fight the waste of the aristocrats, which fed unproductive labour and subtracted resources from investment and productive labour. But for Smith public services and intellectual labour are unproductive because their product is not material. So, he puts the seeds of the dissolution of his own theory. The following decades witness a confrontation between the physiocratic and the Smithian approach. In the end the latter prevails, but its inconsistencies emerge.


Tipo de documento:Artículo
Palabras clave:Productive/unproductive labour; Productive/unproductive consumption; Development; Enlightenment.
Materias:Ciencias Sociales > Economía > Historia económica
Ciencias Sociales > Economía > Teorías económicas
Ciencias Sociales > Economía > Trabajo
Código ID:34875
Depositado:17 Dic 2015 11:41
Última Modificación:23 Feb 2016 13:42

Descargas en el último año

Sólo personal del repositorio: página de control del artículo