Universidad Complutense de Madrid
E-Prints Complutense

Stability of a Novel Intraocular Lens Design: Comparison of Two Trifocal Lenses



Último año

Poyales Galan, Francisco y Garzón Jiménez, Nuria y Rozema, Jos J. y Romero Royo, Concepción y Ortíz de Zárate, Begoña (2016) Stability of a Novel Intraocular Lens Design: Comparison of Two Trifocal Lenses. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 32 (6). pp. 394-402. ISSN 1081-597X

Vista previa
PDF (Versión postprint)

URL Oficial: http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20160428-04


PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes, rotational stability, and centration in a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing cataract surgery who were bilaterally implanted with two different trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with a similar optical zone but different haptic shape.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients (42 eyes) with cataract and less than 1.50 D of corneal astigmatism underwent implantation of one FineVision/MicoF IOL in one eye and one POD FineVision IOL in the contralateral eye (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) at IOA Madrid Innova Ocular, Madrid, Spain. IOL allocation was random. Outcome measures, all evaluated 3 months postoperatively, included monocular and binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA), and near (DCNVA) visual acuity (at 80, 40, and 25 cm) under photopic conditions, refraction, IOL centration, haptic rotation, dysphotopsia, objective quality of vision and aberration quantification, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence.
RESULTS: Three months postoperatively, mean monocular UDVA, CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA (40 cm) under photopic conditions were 0.04 ± 0.07, 0.01 ± 0.04, 0.15 ± 0.11, and 0.16 ± 0.08 logMAR for the eyes implanted with the POD FineVision IOL and 0.03 ± 0.05, 0.01 ± 0.02, 0.17 ± 0.12, and 0.14 ± 0.08 logMAR for those receiving the FineVision/MicroF IOL. Moreover, the POD FineVision IOL showed similar centration (P > .05) and better rotational stability (P < .05) than the FineVision/MicroF IOL. Regarding halos, there was a minimal but statistically significant difference, obtaining better results with FineVision/MicroF. Full spectacle independence was reported by all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed similar visual outcomes for both trifocal IOLs under test (POD FineVision and FineVision/MicroF). However, the POD FineVision IOL showed better rotational stability, as afforded by its design.

Tipo de documento:Artículo
Información Adicional:

Received: June 13, 2015
Accepted: February 04, 2016

Palabras clave:Cataract surgery ; Intraocular lenses ; Trifocal intraocular lenses ; IOLs ; astigmatism ;
Materias:Ciencias Biomédicas > Medicina > Oftalmología
Ciencias Biomédicas > Óptica y optometría > Lentes de contacto
Ciencias Biomédicas > Óptica y optometría > Optometría
Ciencias Biomédicas > Óptica y optometría > Óptica oftálmica
Código ID:38290
Depositado:06 Jul 2016 09:52
Última Modificación:17 Jun 2017 23:01

Descargas en el último año

Sólo personal del repositorio: página de control del artículo