Biblioteca de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Costly capital reallocation and energy use


Díaz, Antonia y Puch, Luis A. y Guilló, María D. (2001) Costly capital reallocation and energy use. [ Documentos de trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE); nº 11, 2001, ]

Vista previa

URL Oficial:


In time series data, energy use does not change much with energy price changes. However, energy use is responsive to international differences in energy prices in cross-section data across countries. In this paper we consider a model of energy use in which production takes place at individual plants and capital can be used either to directly produce output or to reduce the energy required to run the planto We assume that reallocating capital from one use to another is costly. This turns out to be crucial for the quantitative properties of the model to be in conformity with the low short-mn and high long-run elasticities of energy use seen in data. Furthermore, our model displays variations in capacity utilization that are in line with those observed during the period of major oil price increases.

Resumen (otros idiomas)

Se propone un modelo para demostrar que los datos de series temporales muestran que el uso de la energía responde poco a cambios en su precio, pero que, sin embargo, los datos de sección cruzada entre países muestran que el uso de la energía responde a las diferencias internacionales en su precio.

Tipo de documento:Documento de trabajo o Informe técnico
Palabras clave:Uso de la Energía, Precio, Energy price, Energy use, Costly capital reallocation, Number of plants
Materias:Ciencias Sociales > Economía > Economía industrial
JEL:E22, E23, Q43
Título de serie o colección:Documentos de trabajo del Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
Código ID:6795

Andrew Atkeson and Patriek J. Kehoe. Models of energy use: Putty-putty versus putty-elay. American Economic Rcvicw, 80(4):1028-43, 1000.

Timothy F. Bresnahan and Valerie A. Ramey. Segments shifts and eapaeity utilization in the u.s. automobile industry. American Economic Review, 83(2):213-218, 1993.

T. F. Cooley and E. C. Preseott. Eeonomie growth and business eyeles. In T. F. Cooley, editor, Ji'rontiers of Business Cycle Research, chapter 1. Princeton University

Press, Princeton, 199,5.

Thomas F. Cooley, Gary H. Hansen, and Edward C. Prescott. Equilibrium business cyeles with idle resources and variable capacity utilization. Economic Theory, 6:3945, 1995.

Steven J. Davis and John Haltiwanger. Sectoral job ereation and destruction responses to oil price changes. NBER Working Paper 7095, 1999.

Mark E. Doms and Timothy Dunne. Energy intensity, electricity consumption, and advanced manufacturing technology usage. Center for Economic Studies Working Paper 93-9, U.U. Bureau of the Census, 1993.

Mary G. Finn. Variance properties of solow's productivity residual and their cyelical implications. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 19(5-7):1249-81, July-September 1996.

Lawrence H. Goulder. Carbon tax design and U.S. industry performance. In James M. Poterba, editor, Tax Policy and the Economy, Vol. 6, chapter 6. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

Lawrenee H. Goulder. Energy tmws: Traditional effieieney effeets and environmental implications. NBER Working Paper 4582, 1993.

Lawrence H. Goulder. Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: An intertemporal general eqllilibrillm analysis. JOUT1J.n.1 of Environmf'nto.l Economics and Management, 29(3):271-97, 1995.

James D. Hamilton. A neoelassical model of unemployment and the business cyele. Journal of Political Economy, 96(3):593-617, June 1988.

G. D. Hansen. Indivisible labor and the business cyele. Journal of Monetary Economics, 16:300-18, 1085.

Dale W. Jorgenson and Pcter J. Wileoxen. Redueing U.S. earbon em¡ss¡ons: An econometric general equilibrium assessment. Resource and Energy Economics, 15(1):7-25, 1003.

In Moo Kim and Prakash Loungani. The role of energy in real business cycle models. Journal of Monetary Economics, 29(2): 173-89, April 1992.

Robert G. King and Sergio Rebelo. Transitional dynamics and economic growth in the neoclassical model. American Economic Review, 83(4):908-931, 1993.

Richard G. Newell, Adam B. Jaffe, and Robert N. Stavins. The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):941-75, 1999.

Robert S. Pindyck and Julio J. Rotemberg. Dynamic factor demands and the effects of energy price shocks. American Economic Review, 73(5):1066-79, 1983.

R. Rogerson. Indivisible labour lotteries and equilibrium. Journal of Monetary Economics, 21:3-16, 1988.

Julio J. Rotemberg and Michael Woodford. Imperfect competition and the effects of energy price increases on economic activity. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38(4):549-77, November 1996.

Depositado:30 Nov 2007
Última Modificación:29 Abr 2016 12:17

Sólo personal del repositorio: página de control del artículo