Publication: A canonical form for Projected Entangled Pair States and applications
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2009
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
We show that two different tensors defining the same translational invariant injective Projected Entangled Pair State (PEPS) in a square lattice must be the same up to a trivial gauge freedom. This allows us to characterize the existence of any local or spatial symmetry in the state. As an application of these results we prove that a SU(2) invariant PEPS with half-integer spin cannot be injective, which can be seen as a Lieb-Shultz-Mattis theorem in this context. We also give the natural generalization for U(1) symmetry in the spirit of Oshikawa-Yamanaka-Affleck, and show that a PEPS with Wilson loops cannot be injective.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
[1] A. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Commun. Math. Phys. 115, 477 (1988).
[2] F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac (2004), cond-mat/0407066; F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac, Advances in Physics 57, 143 (2008); N. Maeshima, Y. Hieida, Y. Akutsu, T. Nishino, K. Okunishi, Phys. Rev. E 64 (2001) 016705; Y. Nishio, N. Maeshima, A. Gendiar, T. Nishino, cond-mat/0401115 (2004).
[3] M. B. Hastings, Phys. Rev. B 76, 035114 (2007); M. B. Hastings JSTAT, P08024 (2007); F. Verstraete, J.I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. B 73, 094423 (2006)
[4] F. Verstraete, M.M. Wolf, D. P´erez-Garc´ıa, Phys. Rev. Lett 96, 220601 (2006).
[5] O. Buerschaper, M. Aguado, G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B 79, 085119 (2009)
[6] E. Rico, H.J. Briegel, Ann. of Phys. 323:2115-2131 (2008).
[7] D. Gross, J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220503 (2007); D. Gross, J. Eisert, N. Schuch, D. Perez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. A 76, 052315 (2007)
[8] E. Lieb, T. Schultz and D. Mattis, Ann. Phys. 16, 407 (1961).
[9] M.B. Hastings, Phys.Rev. B69 (2004) 104431; B. Nachtergaele, R. Sims, Commun. Math. Phys. 276 (2007) 437–472.
[10] M. Oshikawa, M. Yamanaka and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1984 (1997).
[11] D. P´erez-Garc´ıa, M. M. Wolf, M. Sanz, F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 167202 (2008)
[12] F. Anfuso, A. Rosch Phys. Rev. B 76, 085124 (2007). [13] M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele and R. W. Werner, Comm. Math. Phys. 144, 443 (1992).
[14] D. P´erez-Garc´ıa, F. Verstraete, M.M. Wolf, J.I. Cirac, Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 401 (2007).
[15] G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003).
[16] N. Schuch, M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140506 (2007)
[17] D. P´erez-Garc´ıa, F. Verstraete, J.I. Cirac and M.M. Wolf, Quant. Inf. Comp. 8, 0650-0663 (2008).
[18] R. A. Horn, C. R. Johnson, Topics in Matrix Analysis, Cambridge University Press 1991. [19] S. Singh, R. N. C. Pfeifer, G. Vidal, arXiv:0907.2994.
[20] M. Sanz, M.M. Wolf, D. P´erez-Garc´ıa and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 79, 042308 (2009)
[21] A. Yu. Kitaev, Annals Phys. 303 (2003) 2-30.