Publication:
Matrix product states with long-range localizable entanglement

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2012-12
Authors
Wahl, T. B.
Cirac, Juan I.
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Physical Society
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
We derive a criterion to determine when a translationally invariant matrix product state (MPS) has long-range localizable entanglement, where that quantity remains finite in the thermodynamic limit. We give examples fulfilling this criterion and eventually use it to obtain all such MPS with bond dimension 2 and 3.
Description
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
F. Verstraete, M. Popp, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 027901 (2004). H.-J. Briegel, W. D�ur, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932 (1998). F. Verstraete, M. A. Martin-Delgado, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 087201 (2004). R. Orus, and H.-H. Tu, Phys. Rev. B 83, 201101(R) (2011); S. O. Skrvseth, and S. D. Bartlett, Phys. Rev. A 80, 022316 (2009); J. K. Pachos, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 056402 (2004); B.-Q. Jin, and V. E. Korepin, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062314 (2004). J. Fiurasek, and L. Mi sta, Jr., Phys. Rev. A 75, 060302(R) (2007); A. Serani, G. Adesso, and F. Illuminati, Phys. Rev. A 71, 032349 (2005); G. Adesso, and F. Illuminati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 150503 (2005). V. Subrahmanyama, and A. Lakshminarayanb, Phys. Lett. A 349, 164 (2006). L. Campos Venuti, and M. Roncaglia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 207207 (2005); S. Sahoo, arXiv:1201.5620v4. The case of LRLE needs to be differentiated from the one of diverging entanglement length introduced in [1]: A divergence of the entanglement length only implies that the LE cannot decay exponentially with the spin distance, however it still may decay algebraically, c.f. [12]. D. Perez-Garca, F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. I. Cirac, Quant. Inf. Comp. 7, 401 (2007). C. Schon, E. Solano, F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, and M. M. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 110503 (2005). M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele, R. F. Werner, Commun. Math. Phys. 144, 443 (1992). M. Popp, F. Verstraete, M. A. Martin-Delgado, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 71, 042306 (2005). O. F. Sylju asen, Phys. Lett. A 322, 25 (2004); M. Popp, F. Verstraete, M. A. Martin-Delgado, and J. I. Cirac, Appl. Phys. B 82, 225 (2006); P. Androvitsaneas, E. Paspalakis, and A. F. Terzis, Ann. Phys. 327, 212 (2012). W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998). F. Verstraete, M. A. Martin-Delgado, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 087201 (2004). Note that for D = 2 all isometries are unitaries, i.e., according to (11) all matrices Ai have to be proportional to unitaries themselves. H. Hironaka, Ann. Math. 79, 109 (1964); B. Buchberger, Austria, Universitat Innsbruck, Diss., 1965. C. H. Bennett, H. J. Bernstein, S. Popescu, and B. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046 (1996).
Collections