Universidad Complutense de Madrid
E-Prints Complutense

A comparison of the Iberian and Ebro Basins during the Permian and Triassic, eastern Spain: A quantitative subsidence modelling approach

Impacto

Descargas

Último año



Vargas Hernández, Henar María y Gaspar Escribano, Jorge M. y López Gómez, José y Wes, Jan-Diederik Van y Cloething, Sierd y Horra del Barco, Raúl de la y Arche, Alfredo (2009) A comparison of the Iberian and Ebro Basins during the Permian and Triassic, eastern Spain: A quantitative subsidence modelling approach. Tectonophysics, 474 . pp. 160-183. ISSN 0040-1951

[img] PDF
1MB

URL Oficial: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/product/cws_home/503362/description



Resumen

The Permian–Triassic sediments of the Iberian Plate are a well studied case of classical Buntsandstein–
Muschelkalk–Keuper facies, with good sedimentological interpretations and precise datings based on pollen
and spore assemblages, ammonoids and foraminifera. Synrift–postrift cycles are recorded in these facies, but
there are only a few studies of quantitative subsidence analysis (backstripping method) and only a previous
one using forward modelling for the quantification of synrift–postrift phases of this period.
Here we present the results obtained by the quantitative analysis of fourteen field sections and oil-well electric
log records in the Iberian and Ebro Basins, Spain. Backstripping analysis showed five synrift phases of 1 to
3 million years duration followed by postrift periods for the Permian–Triassic interval. The duration, however,
shows lateral variations and some of them are absent in the Ebro Basin. The forward modelling analysis,
assuming local isostatic compensation, has been applied to each observation point using one-layer and twolayer
lithospheric configurations. The second one shows a better fit between observation and model prediction
in a systematic way, so a two layer configuration is assumed for the sedimentary basin filling analysis.
Lithospheric stretching factors β and δ obtained in the forward modelling analysis are never higher than 1.2,
but sometimes βb1 and simultaneously δN1 in the same section. If surficial extension is compensated by deep
compression either at the roots of the rift basins or in far-away zones is not yet clear, but this anomaly can be
explained using a simple shear extensional model for the Iberian and Ebro basins.


Tipo de documento:Artículo
Palabras clave:Extensional basins; Backstripping; Forward modeling; Subsidence analysis
Materias:Ciencias > Geología > Geología estratigráfica
Código ID:17650
Depositado:15 Ene 2013 10:04
Última Modificación:11 Dic 2018 08:42

Descargas en el último año

Sólo personal del repositorio: página de control del artículo