Publication: Improved method for isochromatic demodulation by RGB calibration
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2002-06-10
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Optical Society of America
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
The red-blue-green (RGB) calibration technique consists in constructing an a priori calibration table of the isochromatic retardation versus the triplet of RGB values obtained with a RGB CCD camera. In this way a lookup table (LUT) is built in which the entry is the corresponding RGB triplet and the output is the given retardation. This calibration (a radiometric quantity) depends on the geometric and chromatic parameters of the setup. Once the calibration is performed, the isochromatic retardation at a given point of the sample is computed as the one that minimizes the Euclidean distance between the measured RGB triplet and the triplets stored in the LUT. We present an enhanced RGB calibration algorithm for isochromatic fringe pattern demodulation. We have improved the standard demodulation algorithm used in RGB calibration by changing the Euclidean cost function to a regularized one in which the fidelity term corresponds to the Euclidean distance between RGB triplets; the regularizing term forces piecewise continuity for the isochromatic retardation. Additionally we have implemented a selective search in the RGB calibration LUT. We have tested the algorithm with simulated as well as real photoelastic data with good results.
Description
© 2002 Optical Society of America.
We appreciate the financial support for this work given by the European Union project Advanced Integrated Nondestructive Testing Concepts for Unified Life-Cycle (INDUCE), BRPR-CT98-0805.
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
1. P. S. Theocaris and E. E. Gdoutos, Matrix Methods in Photoelasticity, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1979).
2. C. Buckberry and D. Towers, “Automatic analysis of isochromatic and isoclinic fringes in photoelasticity using phase-measuring techniques,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 6, 1227–1235 (1995).
3. Y. Morimoto, Y. Morimoto, and T. Hayashi, “Separation of isochromatics and isoclinics using Fourier transform,” Exp. Tech. 1994; September-October 1994; pp. 13–17.
4. J. Carazo-Álvarez, S. J. Haake, and E. A. Patterson, “Completely automated photoelastic fringe analysis,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 21, 133–149 (1994).
5. S. Yoneyama, M. Shimizu, J. Gotoh, and M. Takashi, “Photoelastic analysis with a single tricolor image,” Opt. Lasers Eng. 29, 423–435 (1998).
6. A. Ajovalastic, S. Barone, and G. Petrucci, “Towards RGB photoelasticity: fullfield automated photoelasticity in white light,” Exp. Mech. September 1995, pp. 193–200.
7. J. A. Quiroga, and A. García-Botella, “Demodulation of isochromatic RGB fringe patterns by a improved calibration technique,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Automatic processing of Fringe Patterns, W. Osten and W. Jüptner, eds. Elsevier, Paris, 2001, pp. 126–133.
8. M. J. Ekman and A. D. Nurse, “Completely automated determination of two-dimensional photoelastic parameters using load stepping,” Opt. Eng. 37, 1845–1851 (1998).
9. J. A. Quiroga and A. González-Cano, “Separation of isoclinics and isochromatics from photoelastic data using a regularized phase-tracking technique,” Appl. Opt. 39, 2931–2940 (2000).
10. J. A. Quiroga, M. Servín, and J. L. Marroquín, “Regularized phase tracking technique for demodulation of isochromatics from a single tricolour image,” Meas. Sci. Tech. 13, 132–140 (2002).
11. W. Liu, Z. Wang, G. Mu, and Z. Fang, “Color-coded projection grating method for shape measurement with a single exposure,” Appl. Opt. 39, 3504–3508 (2000).
12. M. Hartl, I. Krupka, and M. Liska, “Diferential colorimetry: tool for evaluation of chromatic interference patterns,” Opt. Eng. 36, 2384–2391 (1997).
13. K. Ramesh, Digital Photoelasticity Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000.