Publication: La respuesta al plagio en la educación superior: un estudio internacional
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2011
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
European Academics Publishers
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El tratamiento del plagio entre el alumnado universitario español ha sido abordado hasta el momento por un reducido número de autores, al igual que también ha sucedido en los demás países de lengua española. Por el contrario, en lengua inglesa hay una gran cantidad de libros y trabajos académicos desde hace muchos años. Esta diferencia del tratamiento del plagio estudiantil está reflejada en la información disponible sobre este tema en los sitios web de las instituciones académicas de diferentes países. Este estudio explora la posición institucional de las universidades en 20 países a través de una muestra de las diez primeras universidades en cada uno de los países considerados, de acuerdo con el Ranking Web de Universidades del Mundo elaborado por el Laboratorio de Cibermetría, un grupo de investigación perteneciente al Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
(CSIC), el mayor centro nacional de investigación de España. Los resultados del estudio muestran que en los países de habla inglesa y en aquellos otros en los que el inglés es una segunda lengua ampliamente utilizada existe una amplia información disponible en las webs de las universidades. En los países de habla española y portuguesa, en Francia e Italia, la información disponible sobre el plagio en las webs de las universidades es escasa. Estos países tienen mucho que aprender de las universidades norteamericanas y de otros países de habla inglesa.
Treatment of plagiarism among Spanish university students has been addressed so far by a few authors, as has also happened in other Spanish speaking countries. In contrast, in English language there are a lot of books and scholarly papers for many years. This difference for dealing with student plagiarism is reflected in the existing information on the subject available in academic institutions websites of different countries. This study explores the institutional position of universities in 20 countries through a sample of the top ten universities in each of the countries considered, according to the Ranking Web of World Universities developed by the Cybermetric Lab, a research group belonging to the Consejo Superior the Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), the largest public research body in Spain. The findings show that in the English speaking countries and those where English is a second language widely used extensive information on plagiarism are available on universities websites. In Spanish and Portuguese speaking countries, France and Italy, plagiarism information available on universities websites is scarce. These countries has much to learn from the North American universities and others English speaking countries.
Treatment of plagiarism among Spanish university students has been addressed so far by a few authors, as has also happened in other Spanish speaking countries. In contrast, in English language there are a lot of books and scholarly papers for many years. This difference for dealing with student plagiarism is reflected in the existing information on the subject available in academic institutions websites of different countries. This study explores the institutional position of universities in 20 countries through a sample of the top ten universities in each of the countries considered, according to the Ranking Web of World Universities developed by the Cybermetric Lab, a research group belonging to the Consejo Superior the Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), the largest public research body in Spain. The findings show that in the English speaking countries and those where English is a second language widely used extensive information on plagiarism are available on universities websites. In Spanish and Portuguese speaking countries, France and Italy, plagiarism information available on universities websites is scarce. These countries has much to learn from the North American universities and others English speaking countries.
Description
XX International Congress of the European
Academy of Management and Business Economics (AEDEM),
Podgorica (Montenegro), 5-6 septiembre. European Academics
Publishers.
Publicación en CD.
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
AGNES J. (2008): “Los usos de Internet en la educación superior: de la documentación al plagio”, Six Degrés”.
(http://www.compilatio.net/files/080521_sixdegres-univ-barcelona_univ-zaragoza_encuesta-plagio.pdf).
ANDERSON, G. L. (1999): “Cyberplagiarism”, College & Research Libraries News, 60 (5), págs. 371-375.
ASHWORTH, P.; BANNISTER, P. Y Thorne, P. (1997): “Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of Cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment”, Studies in higher education, 22, nº 2, págs. 187-203.
ATKINSON, T. (2008): “Textual mapping of imitation and intertextuality in college and university mission statements: A new institutional perspective” Semiotica, 172(1-4), págs. 361-387.
BALLANO, I. Y MUÑOZ, I. (2009): “TIC y discurso académico: algunas consecuencias del ciberplagio”. (http://meb.sev.gob.mx/difusion/tecnologias.pdf).
BAUER, M. (2004): “Accidental vs. Intentional Plagiarism. Avoiding Plagiarism in the Classroom”, University of Hawaii, http://emedia.leeward.hawaii.edu/resources/plagiarism/03Forms.htm), consultado el 5/02/2010.
BLANCH-MUR, C.; REY-ABELLA, F. Y FONT-SOLER, A. (2006): “Nivel de conducta académica deshonesta entre los estudiantes de una escuela de ciencias de la salud”, Enfermería Clínica, 16 (2), págs. 57-61.
BRADLEY, C. (2011): “Plagiarism, Education and Prevention. A subject-driven case-based approach”, CP Chandos Publishing.
BRISTOL, T.J. (2011): “Plagiarism prevention with technology”, Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 6, págs. 146-149.
BROWN,V. J. Y HOWELL, M. E. (2001): “The efficacy of policy statements on plagiarism: do they change students’ views?”, Research in Higher Education, 42 (1), págs.103–118.
BURANEN, L. (2009) “A Safe pace: The Role of Librarians and Writing Centers in Addressing Citation Practices and Plagiarism”, Knowledge Quest, vol. 37, nº 3, págs. 25-33.
BURKILL, S. Y ABBEY, C. (2004): “Avoiding Plagiarism”, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, vol. 38, nº 3, págs. 439-446.
CABEDO, A. (2010): “Recursos informáticos para la detección del plagio académico”, Tejuelo, nº 8, págs. 8-26.
CALDWELL, C. (2010): “A Ten-Step Model for Academy Integrity: A positive Approach for Business Schools”, Journal of Business Ethics, 92, págs. 1-13.
CLARK, R. (2009): “Journal Self-Citation XIX: Self-Plagiarism and Self-Citation-A Practical Guide Based on
Underlying Principles” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol, 25, article 19, págs. 155-164.
COMAS, R.; SUREDA, J. M. Y OLIVER, M. (2011): “Prácticas de citación y Plagio académico en la elaboración textual del alumnado universitario, Tesi, 12(1), págs. 359-385.
CRAIG, P.A.; FEDERICI, E. Y BUEHLER, M.A. (2010): “Instructing students in academic integrity”, Journal of Collage Science Teaching, 40 (2), págs. 50-55.
DUFF, AH.; ROGERS, D.P. Y HARRIS, M.B. (2006): "International engineering students-avoiding plagiarism through understanding the western academic contex of scholarship”, European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 31, nº 6, págs. 673-681.
EAST, J. (2010): “Judging plagiarism: a problem of morality and convention”, High Education, 59, págs. 69-83.
EMBLETON, K. Y HELFER, D. S. (2007): “The Plague of Plagiarism and Academic Dishonesty”, Searcher 15(6), págs. 23-26.
GARCIA-BARBASTEFANO, R. Y GOMES-DE-SOUZA, C. (2007): “Percepção do conceito de plágio acadêmico entre alunos de engenharia de produção e ações para sua redução”; Revista Produção, edición especial diciembre. Artículo extraído de los Anais do xxvii Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. (http://producaoonline.org.br/index.php/rpo/article/view/52/52).
GRANITZ, N. Y D. LOEWY (2007): “Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism”, Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), págs. 293-306.
GU, Q. y BROOKS, J. (2008): “Beyond the accusation of plagiarism”, System 36, págs. 337-352. (Disponible on-line en «http://www.sciencedirect.com», consultado el 20/01/2010).
HAWLEY, C.S. (1984): “The thieves of academic”, Improving College and University Lecturing, 32, nº 1, págs. 35-39.
HAYES, N. E. INTRONA, L.D. (2005): “Cultural Values, Plagiarism, and Fairness: When Plagiarism Gets in the Way of Learning” Ethics y Behavior, 15 (3), págs. 213–321.
HOAD T. C. Y ZOBEL, J. (2003): “Methods for identifying versioned and plagiarised documents”, American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (3), págs. 203-215.
HOWARD, R. M. (2002): “Don’t police plagiarism: just teach!”, Education Digest, 67(5), págs. 46-50.
HOWARD, R.M. (2007): “Understanding “Internet plagiarism”, Computer and Composition, 24, págs. 3-15.
HOWARD, R.M. Y DAVIES, L.J. (2009): “Plagiarism in the Internet Age”, Educational Leadership, march, págs. 64-67.
HYLAND, K. (1999) “Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge”, Applied. Linguistics, págs. 341-367.
KENNEDY, P.; BISPING, T. O.; PATRON, H. Y ROSKELLEY, D.K. (2008): “Modelling Academic Dishonesty: The Role of Student Perceptions and Misconduct Type”, Journal of Economic Education 39 (1), págs. 4-21.
KUMAR, K. (2006): “September 10. Plagiarism questions plague Illinois University: Alumni, faculty group examines top administrators’ speeches and web pages”, St. Louis Dispatch, pág. A06.
LAHM, R.J. Jr. (2007): “Plagiarism and business plans: a growing challenge for entrepreneurship education?”, Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, vol. 10, págs. 73-84.
LAMBERT, E.; HOGAN, N., Y BARTON, S. (2003): “Collegiate academic dishonesty revisited: What have they done, How often have they done it, who does it, and why did they do it?”, Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7(4), págs. 1-27.
LEDWITH, A. Y RISQUEZ. A. (2008): “Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments”, Studies in Higher Education 33, nº. 4: 371–84.
LOWE, H. Y COOK, A. (2003): “Mind the gap: are students prepared for higher education?”, Further Higher Education, 27(1), págs. 53-77.
MACDONALD, R., Y J. CARROLL, J. (2006): “Plagiarism – A complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, nº 2, págs. 233-245.
MARNBURG, E. (2000): “The Behavioural Effects of Corporate Ethical Codes: Empirical Findings and Discussion”, Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(3), págs. 200-210.
MARSDEN, H.; CARROLL, M.; Y NEILL, J. (2005): “Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students”, Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), págs. 1-10.
MARTIN, D.E.; RAO, A. Y SLOAN, L.R. (2011): “Ethnicity, Acculturation and Plagiarism: A Criterion Study of Unethical Academic Conduct”, Human Organization, vol. 70, nº 1, págs. 88-95.
MCCABE, D. L.; BUTTERFIELD, K. D. Y TREVIÑO, L. K. (2003): “Faculty and Academic Integrity: The Influence of Current Honor Codes and Past Honor Code Experiences”, Research in Higher Education 44(3), págs. 367-385.
MCCABE, D. L.; BUTTERFIELD, K. D. Y TREVIÑO, L. K. (2006): “Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs: Prevalence, Causes, and Proposed Action”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 5, nº 3, págs. 294-305.
MCGILL, (2010): “For instructors”, McGill University, Montreal (http:www.mcgill.ca/students/srr/honest/staff/) .
Acceso realizado el 7 de Julio de 2010.
MCKEEVER, L. (2006): “Online plagiarism detection services – Saviour or scourge?”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, nº 2, págs. 155-165.
MEJÍA, J. F. Y ORDÓÑEZ, C. L. (2004): “El fraude académico en la Universidad de los Andes. ¿Qué, qué tanto y por qué?”, Revista de Estudios Sociales, 18, págs. 13-25.
MEYER ZU EISSEN, S. STEIN, B. Y KULIG, M. (2007): "Plagiarism detection without reference collections, en Decker R. y Lenz, H. J. (Eds.), Advances in data analysis, Springer, págs. 359-366.
ORTEGA, E. (2010): “El ciberplagio en la educación superior. La actuación institucional de las universidades españolas”, en Redondo, J.A., Creando clientes en mercados globales, XXIV Congreso Anual AEDEM, Santiago de Compostela, 9-11 Junio, publicación en CD, pág. 299 (13 páginas).
PARK, C. (2003): “In Other (People’s) Words: plagiarism by university students—literature and lessons”, Assessment y Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 28, nº 5, págs. 471-478.
PARK, C. (2004): “Rebels Without a Clause: towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students”, Journal of Further Education, vol. 28, nº 3, págs. 291-306.
PETRESS, K. (2003): “Academic dishonesty: A plague on our profession”, Education, 123, nº 3, págs. 624-627.
PICKARD, J. (2006): “Staff and student attitudes to plagiarism at University College, Northampton”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, nº 2, págs. 215-232.
POTTHAST, M.; BARRÓN-CERDEÑO, A.; STEIN, B. Y ROSSO, P. (2011): “Cross-language plagiarism detection”, Lang Resources & Evaluation, 45, págs. 45-62.
POWER, L.G. (2009): “University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism”, The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 80, nº 6, págs. 643-662.
RAKOVSKI, C.C., Y LEVY, E.S. (2007): “Academic dishonesty: Perceptions of business students”, College Student Journal 41, nº 2, págs. 466-481.
RMUW (2011) “Ranking Mundial de Universidades del Mundo”, Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales (CCHS) del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), España (Acceso realizado el 20 de mayo de 2011. (http://www.webometrics.info/methodology_es.html).
ROMERO, M. Y PÉREZ, M. (2009): “Cómo motivar a aprender en la universidad: una estrategia fundamental contra el fracaso académico en los nuevos modelos educativos”, Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 51,págs. 87-105.
RUDMAN, J. (1997):”The state of authorship attribution studies: Some problems and solutions”, Computers and the Humanities, 31, págs. 351-365.
SALDAÑA-GASTULO, J.; QUEZADA-OSORIA, C., PEÑA-OSCUVILCA, A. Y MAYTA-TRISTÁN, P. (2010): “Alta frecuencia de plagio en Tesis de Medicina de una universidad pública peruana”, Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, 27(1), págs. 63-67.
SCANLON, P.M., Y NEUMANN, D.R. (2002): “Internet plagiarism among college students”, Journal of College Student Development, 43, nº 3, págs. 374-385.
SCHUETZE, P. (2004): “Evaluation of a Brief Homework Assignment Designed to Reduce Citation Problems”, Teaching of Psychology, vol.31, nº 4, págs. 257-262.
SHAHABUDDIN, S. (2009): “Plagiarism in Academia”, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 21, nº 3, págs. 353-359.
SIMS, R. L. (1993): “The Relationship Between Academic Dishonesty and Unethical Business Practices”, Journal of Education for Business, 68(4), págs. 207-211.
SPATT, B. (1983): “Writing from Sources”, St. Martin’s Press.
STEIN, B.; LIPKA, N. Y PRETTENHOFER, P. (2011): "Intrinsic plagiarism analysis" , Lang Resources & Evaluation, 45, págs. 63-82.
STERNGOLD, A. (2004): “Confronting plagiarism: How conventional teaching invites cyber-cheating”, Change 36, nº 3, págs. 16-21.
SUREDA, J. ET AL. (2008a): “El plagio y otras formas de deshonestidad académica entre el alumnado de la Universitat de les Illes Balears”. Resultados generales. Informe de investigación del Grupo Educación y Ciudadanía. Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca,Departamento de Pedagogía Aplicada y Psicología de la Educación. (http://ciberplagio.es/attachment.php?key=37).
SUREDA, J. ET AL. (2008b): “El plagio y otras formas de deshonestidad académica entre el alumnado de la Universidad de Tecmileion. Resultados generales”. Informe de investigación del Grupo Educación y Ciudadanía. Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Departamento de Pedagogía Aplicada y Psicología de la Educación. (http://ciberplagio.es/attachment.php?key=39).
SUTHERLAND-SMITH, W. (2004): “Pandora’s box: Academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, págs. 83-95.
SUTHERLAND-SMITH, W. (2010): “Retribution, deterrence and reform: the dilemmas of plagiarism management in universities”; Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, vol. 32, nº1, págs. 5-16.
SZABO, A. Y UNDERWOOD, J. (2004): “Cybercheats”, Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), págs. 180-199.
WALKER, A. (2008): “Preventing Unintentional Plagiarism: A Method for Strengthening Paraphasing Skills”, Journal of Instructional Psychology, vol.35, nº 4, págs. 387-395.
WALKER, J. (1998): “Student plagiarism in universities: What are we doing about it?”, Higher Education Research and Development 17, nº 1, págs. 89-106.
WALKER, J. (2010): “Measurement plagiarism: researching what students do, not what student say to do”. Studies in Higher Education, vol. 35, nº 1, págs. 41-59.
WILLIAMSON, K.; MCGREGOR, J. Y ARCHIBALD, A. (2009): “Information Seeking and Use by Secondary Students: The Link between Good Practice and the Avoidance of Plagiarism”, American Association of School Librarians, (http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ851698.pdf).
WOOD, G. (2004): “Academic Original Sin: Plagiarism, the Internet and Librarians”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol.30, nº 3, págs. 237-242.
ZWAGERMAN, S. (2008): “The Scarlet P: Plagiarism, panopticism, and the rhetoric of academic integrity”, College Composition and Communication 59, nº 4, págs. 676-710.