Publication: Estructuralismo latinoamericano y neomarxistas: el origen del proceso de subdesarrollo de la periferia
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2013-10-02
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Luis E. Vallejo Zamudio
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Este trabajo pretende establecer un análisis comparativo entre la escuela estructuralista y la escuela neomarxista, para de este modo recuperar el antiguo debate sobre qué es el desarrollo. Para tal propósito se llevará a cabo una revisión de literatura que partirá de las influencias de los clásicos y Marx en la economía del desarrollo. Asimismo, se rescatarán las aportaciones de varias de las figuras destacadas de cada escuela, con el fin de ir hilando las conexiones teóricas entre ambos enfoques de la economía del desarrollo. Además, se incidirá en el concepto de desarrollo, el origen del subdesarrollo de la periferia, las barreras hacia el desarrollo y las estrategias de desarrollo defendidas por estructuralistas y neomarxistas.
This paper seeks to establish a comparative analysis between structuralist and neo-marxists, to thereby recover the old debate about what is development. For this purpose, through a literature review that will depart from the influences of the classics and Marx in development economics. As well, it will recove the contributions of several prominent figures from each school in order to trace the theoretical connections between the two approaches to development economics. In addition, it will analyse the concept of development, the origin of the underdevelopment of the periphery, the barriers to development and development strategies advocated by structuralists and neo-marxists.
This paper seeks to establish a comparative analysis between structuralist and neo-marxists, to thereby recover the old debate about what is development. For this purpose, through a literature review that will depart from the influences of the classics and Marx in development economics. As well, it will recove the contributions of several prominent figures from each school in order to trace the theoretical connections between the two approaches to development economics. In addition, it will analyse the concept of development, the origin of the underdevelopment of the periphery, the barriers to development and development strategies advocated by structuralists and neo-marxists.