Publication: Encrucijadas de la filosofía: algunas dificultades sobre las nociones de trascendentalidad y normatividad en epistemología y filosofía política contemporáneas
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2015-01-16
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El principal tema de esta tesis es un estudio de las propuestas neotrascendentalistas de Karl – Otto Apel, Jürgen Habermas y Seyla Benhabib, que se puede concretar en dos interrogantes: la pertinencia del mantenimiento de una argumentación de carácter trascendental y normativo en la filosofía del siglo XX y las dificultades que pueden surgir cuando esta forma de argumentar se aplica a ámbitos éticos y políticos. Las principales críticas que se dirigirán a los autores mencionados se inspiran en la filosofía pragmática y del lenguaje cotidiano del segundo Wittgenstein. Esta tesis se compone de cuatro partes: en la primera se explica la filosofía trascendental de Apel; en la segunda se detallan las críticas que Habermas realiza a Apel y se empieza a describir el proceso de destrascendentalización de trayectoria de Habermas. En la tercera nos preguntamos si pese a este proceso, aún persisten rasgos trascendentales en la filosofía de este autor. En la cuarta parte se describen distintas críticas que han recibido Apel y Habermas, y las propuestas de estos autores se comparan con la obra de Benhabib. En el último capítulo, las propuestas trascendentales de los autores citados se contrastan con una concepción menos idealista de la filosofía, inspirada en algunas interpretaciones de la obra tardía de Wittgenstein
The main topic of this thesis is an analysis of the neotranscendentalist theories of Karl - Otto Apel, Jürgen Habermas and Seyla Benhabib. This analysis is focused on two interrelated questions: the suitability of maintaining transcendental and normative argumentations in the 20th century philosophy and the difficulties that can arise when these argumentations are applied to a political and ethical field. The main critics that I direct to the aforementioned authors are inspired in the pragmatic and everyday life philosophy of the later Wittgenstein. This thesis is composed of four different parts: in the first one the transcendental Apelsian theory is explained. In the second part, some of the criticisms that Habermas directs at Apel are described and the Habermasian detranscendentalisation of philosophy is described. In the third part, it is considered whether, despite this process, Habermas’ argumentation still retains some transcendental features. In the fourth part, I explain some of the criticisms that Habermas and Apel have received and Communicative Action Theory is compared with Benhabib’s work. In the final chapter, the aforementioned theories are contrasted with an everyday and less idealist philosophy, which is inspired by some interpretations of the later Wittgenstein’s work
The main topic of this thesis is an analysis of the neotranscendentalist theories of Karl - Otto Apel, Jürgen Habermas and Seyla Benhabib. This analysis is focused on two interrelated questions: the suitability of maintaining transcendental and normative argumentations in the 20th century philosophy and the difficulties that can arise when these argumentations are applied to a political and ethical field. The main critics that I direct to the aforementioned authors are inspired in the pragmatic and everyday life philosophy of the later Wittgenstein. This thesis is composed of four different parts: in the first one the transcendental Apelsian theory is explained. In the second part, some of the criticisms that Habermas directs at Apel are described and the Habermasian detranscendentalisation of philosophy is described. In the third part, it is considered whether, despite this process, Habermas’ argumentation still retains some transcendental features. In the fourth part, I explain some of the criticisms that Habermas and Apel have received and Communicative Action Theory is compared with Benhabib’s work. In the final chapter, the aforementioned theories are contrasted with an everyday and less idealist philosophy, which is inspired by some interpretations of the later Wittgenstein’s work
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filosofía, leída el 30-06-2014