Publication: O papel dos modelos conceituais para interoperabilidade entre acervos digitais de arquivos, bibliotecas e museus
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2015-11-17
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
A partir do surgimento da Web propiciou a publicação de acervos digitais de arquivos, bibliotecas e museus através da disponibilização de catálogos acessíveis pela Web e colocaram a questão da integração destes acervos, a chamada interoperabilidade. Atualmente as possibilidades trazidas pelas tecnologias da Web Semântica e dados abertos interligados colocam a questão da interoperabilidade destes acervos em um novo patamar, ampliando suas possibilidades ao permitirem que acervos sejam publicados diretamente na Web e não mais intermediados por sistemas gerenciadores de catálogos. Assim o conteúdo dos catálogos passa a poder ter “links” de e para qualquer outro recurso disponível na Web, sejam eles de outras coleções digitais de memória e cultura ou mesmo de fora deste contexto. Ampliam-se as demandas pela preservação da semântica dos conteúdos disponibilizados, garantida anteriormente pelos sistemas de catálogos. Ao mesmo tempo estas tecnologias viabilizam novos tipos de relações culturamente relevantes podem ser estabelecidas entre objetos de diferentes catálogos. Que papel jogam neste contexto os modelos conceituais? Este trabalho tem como objetivo recolocar a questão da interoperabilidade entre acervos digitais a luz das possibilidades trazidas pelas tecnologias da Web Semântica e dos dados abertos interligados. Como metodologia foi utilizada a revisão do estado da arte - aspectos teóricos, técnicos, projetos, experiências - a repeito da questão da interoperabilidade e utilização de parâmetros de análise homogeneidade/heterogeneidade dos acervos a serem integrados e mecanismos para garantir que os significados originais dos conteúdos nos sistemas isolados seriam preservados. Como resultados o papel dos modelos conceituais e vocabulários específicos é destacado como elemento fundamental para alcançar a interoperabilidade semântica entre acervos digitais heterogêneos diante das possibilidades de integração de acervos digitais trazidas pelas tecnologias da Web Semântica e dos dados abertos interligados.
The raise of the Web enable the publication of digital collection of archives, libraries and museum through Web catalogs and poses the question of their integration, namely interoperability. Today the possibilities bring about by technologies such as Semantic Web and linked open data position interoperability in a new baseline, enlarging its possibilities by enabling digital collections be published directly on the web independently of any catalog management systems. Thus digital collection records may have links to and be linked from any resource available on the web, be it a record in another heritage collection or even beyond this context. At the same time these technologies enable new cultural relevant relations to be settled between digital objects of different cultural heritage collections. Which is the role of conceptual models in this context? This paper aims at posing the issues related to interoperability between digital collection in light of the facilities offered by Semantic Web and linked open data technologies. It uses as methodology a state of the art review of theoretical and technical issues, projects, cases, etc., related to interoperability and analyses interoperability solutions based on two parameters, homogeneity/heterogeneity and the preservation of original semantic of the collections to be made interoperable. As results the paper stress the role of semantic models and vocabularies to achieve semantic interoperability between heterogeneous digital collections within the scope of the facilities offered by Semantic Web and linked open data technologies.
The raise of the Web enable the publication of digital collection of archives, libraries and museum through Web catalogs and poses the question of their integration, namely interoperability. Today the possibilities bring about by technologies such as Semantic Web and linked open data position interoperability in a new baseline, enlarging its possibilities by enabling digital collections be published directly on the web independently of any catalog management systems. Thus digital collection records may have links to and be linked from any resource available on the web, be it a record in another heritage collection or even beyond this context. At the same time these technologies enable new cultural relevant relations to be settled between digital objects of different cultural heritage collections. Which is the role of conceptual models in this context? This paper aims at posing the issues related to interoperability between digital collection in light of the facilities offered by Semantic Web and linked open data technologies. It uses as methodology a state of the art review of theoretical and technical issues, projects, cases, etc., related to interoperability and analyses interoperability solutions based on two parameters, homogeneity/heterogeneity and the preservation of original semantic of the collections to be made interoperable. As results the paper stress the role of semantic models and vocabularies to achieve semantic interoperability between heterogeneous digital collections within the scope of the facilities offered by Semantic Web and linked open data technologies.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
Agosti, M., Schek, H. J., & Türker, C. (2004). Digital Library Architectures: Peer-to-peer, Grid, and Service-orientation: Pre-proceedings of the Sixth Thematic Workshop of the EU Network of Excellence DELOS: S. Margherita Di Pula, Cagliari, Italy, 24-25 June, 2004. Edizioni Progetto. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Leonardo_Candela/ publication/200462074_Moving_Digital_Library_Service_Systems_to_the_Grid/links/0fcfd50519eff1bed6000000.pdf.
Arms, William Y. et al. (2002). A Spectrum of Interoperability: the site for Science for Prototype for the NSDL. D-Lib Magazine, 8(1). http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/january02/arms/01arms.html.
Be part of the Web. (2011). Report of the Stanford Linked Data Workshop, 27 June – 1 July 2011. http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub152abst.html.
Bean, Carol A.; Greeen, Rebecca (Eds.) (2001). Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Press. (Information Science and Knowledge Management, v. 2).
Brooks, B. (1980). The foundations of information science. Part I. Philosophical aspects, Journal of Information Science, 2, 125-133.
Candela, L., Castelli, D., Pagano, P., Thano, C., Ioannidis, Y., Koutrika, G., ... & Schuldt, H. (2007). Setting the foundations of digital libraries: The delos manifesto. D-Lib Magazine, 13(3), 4. Disponível em: <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/ castelli/03castelli.html>. Acesso em 21 jun. 2015.
Candela, L., Castelli, D., Ferro, N., Koutrika, G., Meghini, C., Pagano, P., ... & Dobreva, M. (2008). The DELOS Digital Library Reference model. Foundations for digital Libraries (Version 0.98). http://eprints.port.ac.uk/4104/, 12 jun. 2015.
Chan, Lois Mai, Zeng, Marcia Lei. (2006). Metadata interoperability and standardization-A study of methodology, Part I. D-Lib Magazine, 12(6), 3. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/chan/06chan.html.
Chan, Lois Mai, Zeng, Marcia Lei. (2006). Metadata interoperability and standardization-A study of methodology, Part II. D-Lib magazine, 12(6), 4. http://mirror.dlib.org/dlib/june06/zeng/06zeng.html.
Clough, Wayne. (2013). Best of both worlds: museums, libraries and archives in a digital age. Smithsonian Institute. http://www.si.edu/content/gwc/ bestofbothworldssmithsonian.pdf.
Concordia, Cesare, Grandmann, Stefan, Siebinga, Sjoerd. (2010). Not just another portal, not just another digital library: A portrait of Europeana as an application program interface. IFLA journal, 36(1), 61-69.
DEFINITION OF THE EUROPEANA DATA MODEL v5.2.5. 2015. Disponível em: <http://pro.europeana.eu/documents/900548/0d0f6ec3-1905-4c4f-96c8-1d817c03123c>. Acesso em: 15 nov. 2014.
Doerr, Martin, et al. (2010). The europeana data model (EDM). In: World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA general conference and assembly, Proceedings. 2010. p. 10-15. http://kennison.name/files/zopestore/uploads/metadata/europeana/ presentation.pdf.
Doerr, M., & LeBoeuf, P. (2007). Modelling intellectual processes: the FRBR-CRM harmonization. In Digital libraries: Research and development (pp. 114-123). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://network.icom.museum/fileadmin/user_upload/minisites/ cidoc/ConferencePapers/2006/Doerr_LeBoeuf.pdf.
Doerr, M., Bekiari, C., LeBoeuf, P., & nationale de France, B. (2008, September). FRBRoo, a conceptual model for performing arts. In 2008 Annual Conference of CIDOC, Athens (September 2008). 06-18 . http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/2008-09-12_PerformingArts.pdf.
Farradane, J. (1980). Relational indexing. Part I, Journal of Information Science, (1), 267-276.
Gueguen, Gretchen, Fonseca, Vitor Manoel Marques da, Pitti, Daniel V., Sibille-de-Grimoüard, Claire. (2013). Para um modelo conceitual internacional de descrição arquivística. Acervo, 26(2). http://www.revistaacervo.an.gov.br/seer/index.php/ info/article/view/658.
Guarino, Nicola. (1997). Some organizing principles for a unified top-level ontology. In: AAAI Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering. 1997. 57-63. http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/1997/SS-97-06/SS97-06-008.pdf.
Heath, T., & Bizer, C. (2011). Linked data: Evolving the web into a global data space. Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology, 1(1), 1-136. http://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.2200/s00334ed1v01y201102wbe001
Hsi, Sherry. (2002). The Electronic Guidebook: A study of user experiences using mobile web content in a museum setting. In: Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE International Workshop. IEEE. 48-54.
Isaac, Antoine, et al. (2008). Integrated access to cultural heritage resources through representation and alignment of controlled vocabularies. Library Review, 57(3), 187-199. Disponível em: <http://wiki.datadryad.org/images/d/d3/Test.pdf2>.
Kakali, Constantia et al. (2007). Integrating Dublin Core metadata for cultural heritage collections using ontologies. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Proceedings... 2007. 128-139. http://dcpapers.dublincore. org/index.php/pubs/article/viewFile/871/867.
Khoo, Christopher S. G.; Na, Jin-Cheon. (2006). Semantic Relations in Information Science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 157-228.
Legg, Catherine. (2007). Ontologies on the Semantic Web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 407-451.
Marcondes, C. H. (2011). O papel das relações semânticas na organização do conhecimento em ambientes digitais In: Cenários da Organização do Conhecimento: Linguagens documentárias em cena. Ed. Brasília: Tesaurus. 129-168. ISBN: 978-85-409-0022-6.
Marcondes, C. H. (2012). “LINKED DATA” E INTEROPERABILIDADE ENTRE ARQUIVOS, BIBLIOTECAS E MUSEUS NA WEB. Niterói: PROPi/UFF, 2012. (Projeto de Iniciação Científica submetido e aprovado pelo Programa Institucional de Bolsas de Iniciação Científica PIBIC – UFF 2012).
Miller, D. L. (1947). Explanation Versus Description, Philosophical Review, 56(3), 306-312.
Miller, Paul (2000). Interoperability: what is it and why should I want it. Ariadne, 24. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/.
Miller, Paul (1999). Dublin Core for Museum. In: Interoperability Focus. Taiwan: UKOLN, 1999.
Morgan, Eric Lease (2004). An Introduction to the Search/Retrieve URL Service (SRU). Ariadne, 40. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue40/morgan/.
Nilsson, Michael; Baker, Thomas; Johnston, Pete. (2009). Interoperability Levels for Dublin Core Metadata. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (DCMI recommended resource). http://dublincore.org/documents/2009/05/01/interoperability-levels/.
NISO. (2004). UNDERSTANDING METADATA. Bethesda (EUA), National Information Standards Organization. Disponível em: <http://www.niso.org/publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 mai. 2015.
Oldoman, Dominic, et al. (2014). Realizing lessons of the last 20 years: A manifesto for data provisioning & aggregation services for the digital humanities (a position paper). D-lib magazine, 20(7), 6. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july14/oldman/07oldman. html.
RDF Primer. (2004). Manola, Frank; Miller, Eric (eds.). W3Chttp://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-primer-20040210/.
Perkins, J., & Spinazze, A. T. (1999). Finding Museum Information in the Internet Commons: A Report on the CIMI Dublin Core Metadata Testbed Project. In ICHIM, 175-177.
Ribeiro, Fernanda. (2011). Arquivística como disciplina aplicada no campo da Ciência da Informação. Perspectivas em Gestão & Conhecimento. João Pessoa. ISSN 2236-417X, 1(1), 59-73. http://periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/pgc/issue/current/ showToc.
Rodríguez, E. M. M., & Greenberg, J. (2012). Linked data for open vocabularies and HIVE's global framework. El profesional de la información,21(3), 236-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.may.03
Svensson, L. G. (2013). Are current bibliographic models suitable for integration with the web. Information Standards Quarterly, Winter, 25(4), 6-13. http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/11931/FE_Svensson_bibliographic_models_isqv25no4.pdf.
Tzouvaras, V. et al. (2012). REPORT ON SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY WITH EUROPEANA. ECP 2008 DILI 518002EUscreen. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 31 mai. 2015.
Shet, A.; Arpinar, I. B.; Kashyap, V. (2003). Relationships at the heart of semantic web: modeling, discovering and exploiting complex semantic relationships. In: M. Nikravesh, B. Azvine, R. Yager and L.A. Zadeh (eds.), Enhancing the Power of the Internet - studies in fuzziness and soft computing. Springer-Verlag. http//cgsb2.nlm.nih.gov/~kashyap/publications/relations.pdf.
Walch, Victoria Irons. (1994). Standards for Archival Description: a handbook. Society of Americam Archivists. http://www.archivists.org/catalog/stds99/index.html