Publication: Estudio de la producción Ibérica en Biblioteconomía y Documentación a través del análisis de Comunidades Bibliográficas
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2015-11-17
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
En este trabajo se analizan las publicaciones de España y Portugal incluidas en la categoría Library and Information Science de Web of Science. El objetivo es conocer las características de la producción y analizar las diferencias y similitudes en el corpus documental usado como marco conceptual en cada uno de estos dos países. La metodología consta de dos etapas: en la primera se recogió la producción en Social Science Citation Index y se obtuvieron los principales indicadores bibliométricos de actividad, especialización, colaboración, impacto y visibilidad. En la segunda, se utilizó el método de bibliographic coupling para detectar “comunidades bibliográficas” relacionadas por referencias comunes. Los resultados de la primera fase muestran que España cuenta con una producción muy superior a la de Portugal (2425 documentos frente a 201), aunque con menores proporciones de colaboración internacional (19% frente a 37% de Portugal). En la segunda fase, la obtención de clusters bibliográficos permitió observar notables diferencias en los perfiles de producción de ambos países. En el conjunto bibliográfico español las principales comunidades están integradas por textos relacionados con Cienciometría; Recuperación de Información; Internet y Evaluación de revistas. En Portugal se relacionan con Tecnología de la información; Cienciometría y Gestión de la información. El estudio de clustering permitió detectar cuáles son las instituciones, autores, revistas y keyword con mayor presencia en cada una de las comunidades bibliográficas y determinar su nivel de especialización. En ambos países la comunidad cienciométrica es la más internacionalizada ya que utiliza como referencia bibliografía de autores extranjeros y se publica en revistas de otros países. Por el contrario, en las restantes comunidades los referentes son por general autores locales.
Publications from Spain and Portugal under the category Library and Information Science (LIS) included in the Web of Science are analyzed. The goal is to know the characteristics of LIS production and analyze differences and similarities in the documentary corpus used as a conceptual framework in each of these two countries. The methodology consists of two stages: in the first, production in Social Science Citation Index was collected and the main bibliometric indicators of activity, specialization, collaboration, impact and visibility were obtained. Bibliographic coupling method was used in the second stage, to detect "Bibliographical communities" related by common references. The results from the first stage shows that Spain has a production well above that of Portugal (2425 versus 201 documents), although with minor proportions of international collaboration (19% vs. 37% in Portugal). In the second stage, obtaining bibliographic clusters allowed to observe significant differences in the production profiles of both countries. In Spanish literature major communities together are composed of texts related to Scientometrics; Information Retrieval; Assessment of Internet and Journals. In Portugal their publications are related to Information Technology; Scientometrics and Information Management. The clustering analysis allowed the identification of institutions, authors, journals and keywords with greater presence in each of the communities, as well as to determine their level of expertise. In both countries the scienciometric community is the most internationalized, since they used foreign authors as reference literature and published in journals of other countries. By contrast, in the remaining communities local authors are more prominent.
Publications from Spain and Portugal under the category Library and Information Science (LIS) included in the Web of Science are analyzed. The goal is to know the characteristics of LIS production and analyze differences and similarities in the documentary corpus used as a conceptual framework in each of these two countries. The methodology consists of two stages: in the first, production in Social Science Citation Index was collected and the main bibliometric indicators of activity, specialization, collaboration, impact and visibility were obtained. Bibliographic coupling method was used in the second stage, to detect "Bibliographical communities" related by common references. The results from the first stage shows that Spain has a production well above that of Portugal (2425 versus 201 documents), although with minor proportions of international collaboration (19% vs. 37% in Portugal). In the second stage, obtaining bibliographic clusters allowed to observe significant differences in the production profiles of both countries. In Spanish literature major communities together are composed of texts related to Scientometrics; Information Retrieval; Assessment of Internet and Journals. In Portugal their publications are related to Information Technology; Scientometrics and Information Management. The clustering analysis allowed the identification of institutions, authors, journals and keywords with greater presence in each of the communities, as well as to determine their level of expertise. In both countries the scienciometric community is the most internationalized, since they used foreign authors as reference literature and published in journals of other countries. By contrast, in the remaining communities local authors are more prominent.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
Fruchterman, T. M. J.; Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph Drawing by Force-Directed Placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21(11): 1129-1164.
Grauwin, S.; Jensen, P. (2011). Mapping scientific institutions. Scientometrics, 89 (3): 943-954
Grauwin, S. y otros (2012). Complex systems science: Dreams of universality, interdisciplinarity reality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (7): 1327-1338
Grupo SCIMAGO (2005). Producción española con visibilidad internacional (ISI–WOS) en biblioteconomía y documentación (I). El profesional de la información, 14 (6): 459-461
Jiménez-Contreras, E (2002). La aportación española a la producción científica internacional en biblioteconomía y documentación: balance de diez años (1992–2001), Revista BiD, 9. Accesible en: http://bid.ub.edu/09jimen2.htm
Kessler, M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1): 10-25
Levitt, J.; Thelwall, M. (2009). The most highly cited Library and Information Science articles: Interdisciplinarity, first authors and citation patterns, Scientometrics, 78(1): 45-67
Nixon, JM Core Journals in Library and Information Science: Developing a Methodology for Ranking LIS Journals. College & research libraries, 75(1): 66-90
Olmeda-Gómez, C.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ovalle-Perandones, M.A. (2008) Producción portuguesa en Biblioteconomía y Documentación. Web of Science, 1990-2005. III Encuentro Ibérico de Docentes e Investigadores en Información y Documentación. Mayo 2008
Thomsom Reuters: 2015a: Essential Science Indicators
Thomsom Reuters: 2015b: Journal Citation Report
Tuomaala, O; Jarvelin, K; Vakkari, P (2014) Evolution of Library and Information Science, 1965-2005: Content Analysis of Journal Articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol 65(7): 1446-1462 DOI: 10.1002/asi.23034