Publication: Zubiri y Ellacuría: fundamentos filosóficos para una teoría estructural y una praxeología crítica de las relaciones internacionales
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2016-06-07
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
La hipótesis de partida de esta tesis es que la teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales (RRII) se encuentra ante un problema de carácter filosófico que impide su adecuada fundamentación. El objeto mismo de la teoría de las RRII ha sido foco de numerosas disputas a lo largo y ancho de los debates con que la disciplina ha explicado sus diversos posicionamientos y enfoques. De igual manera, diferentes aproximaciones metodológicas han ido evolucionando al albur de los avances que la Filosofía de la Ciencia venía incorporando. Así, los diversos puntos de vista han tratado de adaptarse a las novedades de carácter epistemológico que incorporaba la Teoría de la Ciencia en forma de nuevos paradigmas y programas de investigación sin detenerse lo suficiente en revisar los postulados sustanciales sobre los que partió y se desarrollaron las distintas teorizaciones. Con demasiada frecuencia, los conceptos que guiaron los esfuerzos de la revisión de dichos postulados fueron utilizados de forma superficial, tratando con ello más bien de sustentar las teorías pre-configuradas que de realizar una aproximación reflexiva a la realidad sobre la que se pretendía teorizar, lo que ha evidenciado una insuficiencia conceptual de la teoría de las RRII para hacer frente a la realidad (Ashley 1984; Bohman 2009; Cox y Schechter 2002; Jackson 2008; Lapid 2003; Monteiro y Ruby 2009; Walker 1993)...
The starting assumption of this thesis is that International Relations (IR) theory faces a philosophical problem, which prevents its proper foundation. The main object of IR itself has been the focus of several discussions throughout many debates with which the discipline has explained its different positions and approaches. In the same manner, different methodological approaches have evolved according to the whims of the new advances that Science Philosophy has been incorporating. Therefore, the different approaches have tried to adapt themselves to the epistemological developments that Science Theory was incorporating as new paradigms and research programs, without taking enough time to review the essential postulates on which the different theorizations were based and developed. Too often conceptualizations which guided the efforts of the review of the mentioned postulates were used in a superficial way, trying to found pre-shaped theories rather than developing a reflective approach to reality. What has demonstrated that there is a conceptual failure of the IR theory to the face reality about which they want to theorize (Ashley 1984; Bohman 2009; Cox y Schechter 2002; Jackson 2008; Lapid 2003; Monteiro y Ruby 2009; Walker 1993)...
The starting assumption of this thesis is that International Relations (IR) theory faces a philosophical problem, which prevents its proper foundation. The main object of IR itself has been the focus of several discussions throughout many debates with which the discipline has explained its different positions and approaches. In the same manner, different methodological approaches have evolved according to the whims of the new advances that Science Philosophy has been incorporating. Therefore, the different approaches have tried to adapt themselves to the epistemological developments that Science Theory was incorporating as new paradigms and research programs, without taking enough time to review the essential postulates on which the different theorizations were based and developed. Too often conceptualizations which guided the efforts of the review of the mentioned postulates were used in a superficial way, trying to found pre-shaped theories rather than developing a reflective approach to reality. What has demonstrated that there is a conceptual failure of the IR theory to the face reality about which they want to theorize (Ashley 1984; Bohman 2009; Cox y Schechter 2002; Jackson 2008; Lapid 2003; Monteiro y Ruby 2009; Walker 1993)...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, Departamento de Derecho Internacional Público y Relaciones Internacionales, leída el 18-12-2015