Publication: La "BICtitis" o la alergia social (¿o sólo política?) a la protección de los bienes culturales de carácter territorial : reflexiones y propuestas a partir del caso de la Vega de Granada.
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2015
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Servicio de Publicaciones
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
La comunicación que presentamos se basa en el importante movimiento ciudadano desarrollado en defensa de la Vega de Granada para reflexionar sobre un aspecto que nos parece cada vez más preocupante: la falta de un consenso social, cuando no rechazo, sobre la protección de los bienes culturales de carácter territorial, especialmente los paisajes culturales, mediante la legislación de Patrimonio Cultural. Este rechazo, que hemos denominado BICtitis, está teniendo un impacto significativo en los principios de protección del Patrimonio Cultural: el predominio de los instrumentos de planificación urbana y territorial sobre las declaraciones de Patrimonio, la naturalización de los bienes culturales territoriales o la excesiva importancia otorgada a la opinión de la población afectada. Una vez identificados todos estos efectos nocivos, realizamos una serie de propuestas para defender la validez de la utilización de la legislación del Patrimonio Cultural en la preservación de los bienes de carácter territorial.
The present paper is based on the important citizen movement developed in defence of the Vega of Granada with the aim to reflect on an increasingly troubling aspect: the lack of social consensus, if not rejection, to the protection of cultural properties characterized by a broad territorial dimension, especially cultural landscapes, by the cultural heritage law. This rejection, which we have called BICtitis, is having a significant impact on the criteria for the protection of Cultural Heritage: the predominance of urban and regional planning instruments over heritage declarations, The present paper is based on the important citizen movement developed in defence of the Vega of Granada with the aim to reflect on an increasingly troubling aspect: the lack of social consensus, if not rejection, to the protection of cultural properties characterized by a broad territorial dimension, especially cultural landscapes, by the cultural heritage law. This rejection, which we have called BICtitis, is having a significant impact on the criteria for the protection of Cultural Heritage: the predominance of urban and regional planning instruments over heritage declarations,the naturalization of territorial cultural properties or the excessive importance given to the views of the affected population. Once all these harmful effects have been identified, we conduct several proposals to defend the validity of the cultural heritage law to preserve territorial heritage properties.
The present paper is based on the important citizen movement developed in defence of the Vega of Granada with the aim to reflect on an increasingly troubling aspect: the lack of social consensus, if not rejection, to the protection of cultural properties characterized by a broad territorial dimension, especially cultural landscapes, by the cultural heritage law. This rejection, which we have called BICtitis, is having a significant impact on the criteria for the protection of Cultural Heritage: the predominance of urban and regional planning instruments over heritage declarations, The present paper is based on the important citizen movement developed in defence of the Vega of Granada with the aim to reflect on an increasingly troubling aspect: the lack of social consensus, if not rejection, to the protection of cultural properties characterized by a broad territorial dimension, especially cultural landscapes, by the cultural heritage law. This rejection, which we have called BICtitis, is having a significant impact on the criteria for the protection of Cultural Heritage: the predominance of urban and regional planning instruments over heritage declarations,the naturalization of territorial cultural properties or the excessive importance given to the views of the affected population. Once all these harmful effects have been identified, we conduct several proposals to defend the validity of the cultural heritage law to preserve territorial heritage properties.