Publication:
Patterns of local R&D cooperation of foreign subsidiaries in an intermediate country: innovative and structural factors

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2016
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI)
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
We attempt to contribute to a better understanding of cooperative innovation patterns of foreign subsidiaries (FS) in Spain as a representative intermediate country, going deeply into three main aspects: firstly, a sectoral taxonomy which combines international technological dynamism and revealed technological advantage as a way to understand such patterns. Secondly we focus our attention on innovative intensive subsidiaries, assuming they are the most important ones for hosting countries. Thirdly, we combine innovation and structural-competitive variables to explain local cooperation. We found more intense cooperation of FS with local agents in dynamic specialization sectors, as well as the fact that this is mostly carried out in a complementary mode with inner knowledge capabilities of the companies. Cooperative activities are influenced by economicstructural factors of the Spanish economy, particularly in highly innovative companies. Cooperative strategies of domestic firms might also have an influence on those of foreign subsidiaries.
Description
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
Ahuja, G. (2000): “The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages.” Strategic Management Journal 21. Archibugi, D. and J. Michie (1995): “The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 19. Blanc, H. and C. Sierra (1999). “The internationalisation of R&D by multinationals: a tradeoff between external and internal proximity.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 23. Blomkvist, K., Kappen, P., Zander, I (2014): “Superstar inventors. Towards a people-centric perspective on the geography of technological renewal in the multinational corporation”. Research Policy, 43. Blomkvist, K., Kappen, P., Zander, I. (2014a): “Win, Place, or Show?: How Foreign Investment Strategies Contribute to the Technological Growth of the Multinational Corporation”. Long range planning, 47. Cantwell (1989): Technological Inovation and Multinational Corporations. Basil Blackwell. Oxford. Cantwell (2009): Location and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies. 40. Cantwell, J. (1995): “The globalisation of technology: What remains of the Product Cycle Model?, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19. Cantwell, J. (2015): “The Role of International Business in the Global Spread of Technological Innovation”. In Yama Temouri and Chris Jones (Eds): International Business and Institutions after the Financial Crisis. Palgrave, McMillan, DOI: 10.1057/9781137367204.0001. Cantwell, J. and Janne, O.E.M. (1999): “Technological globalisation and innovative centres: the role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy”, Research Policy, vol. 28, nos. 2-3. Cantwell, J. and Molero, J. (2003): Multinational enterprises, innovative starategies and systems of innovation. Edward Elgar. Cantwell, J. and Piscitello, L. (2000): “Accumulating technological competence – its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalisation”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 9,1. Cantwell, J. and Piscitello, L. (2014): New Competence creation in the Multinational Company Subunits. The role of International Knowledge. The World economy. Doi 10.1111/twec.12.175. Cantwell, J.A. and Mudambi, R. (2001): “MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates: an empirical investigation”, University of Reading Discussion Paper in International Investment and Management, 285. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1989): “Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D.” Economic Journal 99. Cozza, C. and Zanfei, A. (2015): Firm heterogeneity, absorptive capacity and technical linkages with external parties in Italy. Paper presented to the international workshop on the internationalization of innovation, Madrid. Institute of Research on innovation (IREIN) and Ramon Areces Foundation, Madrid. http://www.ireinnova.com/images/stories/Jornadas/Conferencias_2015. pdf. Dunning, J.H (1958):American Investment in British Manufacturing Industry, Routledge, London. Ebersberger, B., S. J. Herstad, et al. (2011): Analysis of innovation drivers and barriers in support of better policies. Economic and market intelligence on innovation. Open innovation in Europe: effects, determinants and policy. Oslo, European Commission. Enterprise and Industry. ETAN (1998): Internationalisation of research and technology. Trends, issues and implications for S&T Policies in Europe.ETAN Working Paper.EuropeanCommission.DGXII. Brussels. European Commission (2014): Innovation Union Scoreboard.European Union. Belgium. Franco, E., & Quadros, R. (2003). Patterns of technological activities of transnational corporations affiliates in Brazil. Research Evaluation, 12(2). García Sánchez, A., J. Molero, and R. Rama. (2015) “Are “the best” multinationals cooperating locally for innovation ? The case of an intermediate country.” Science & Public Policy (SPP) DOI 10.1093/scipol/scv057. Granstrand, O; Hakanson, L and Sjolander, S. (1993): Internationalisation of R&D. A survey of some recent research. Research Policy, 22. Guimón, J. (2011): “Policies to benefit from the globalization of corporate R&D:An exploratory study for EU countries.” Technovation 31. Ho, H.-C. On Explaining Locational Patterns of R&D Activties by Multinational Enterprises. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University Press, 2006. Holl, A. and R. Rama (2014 ): “Foreign subsidiaries and technology sourcing in Spain.” Industry and Innovation 21(1). Huergo Orejas, E., and Rojas Pizarro, F. (2014). “Evaluación de políticas públicas de apoyo a la I+D+i empresarial”. In J. C. Fariñas García & J. Fernández de Guevara (Eds.), La empresa española ante la crisis del modelo productivo. Productividad, competitividad e innovación (pp. 247-270). Madrid: Fundación BBVA. Kuemmerle, W. (1999): “Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries: results from a survey of multinational firms”, Research Policy, 28. Malerba.F. (2002): Sectoral Patterns of Innovation and Production. Research Policy, vol 31.2. Manolopoulus, D., Papanastassiou, M and Pearce, R. (2005): “Technology sourcng in multinational enterprises and the roe of subsidiaries: an empirical investigation”. International Business Review, 14. Molero, J and Garcia, A. (2008): “The innovative activity of foreign subsidiaries in the Spanish Innovation System: an evaluation of their impact from a sectoral taxonomy approach”. Technovation, nº 28. Molero, J. (1995) (ed.): Technological Innovation, Multinational Companies and new International Competitiveness. The case of intermediate countries. Harwood Academic Pubishers. Molero, J. (2002): “The innovative behaviour of MNC subsidiaries in uneven European Systems of Innovation: a comparative analysis of the German and Irish cases”, The Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, vol. 13, nos. 1-3. Molero, J. and Heyst, J. (2002): “Difference of innovative behaviour between national and foreign firms: measuring the impact of foreign firms on National Innovation Systems”. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Vol 2, nº 2/3. Narula, R. (2001): “Choosing between internal and non-internal R&D activities: some technological and economic factors”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 13. Narula, R. (2014): “Exploring the Paradox of Competence-creating Subsidiaries: Balancing Bandwidth and Dispersion in MNEs”. Long Range Planning, 47. Patel, P. (1995): “The localised production of global technology”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19. Patel, P. and K. Pavitt (1991): “Large firms in the production of the world’s technology: an important case of ‘non-globalisation.” Journal of International Business Studies 22. Patel,P. and Pavitt, K. (1991a): Europe´s technological performance.. In Ch. Freeman, M. Sharp and W. Walter (Eds). Global competition and the environment in the 1990´s. Pinter, London. Pavitt, K. (1984): Sectoral patterns of technological change. Towards a taxonomy and theory. Research. Policy, vol 6. Pearce, R. (1999): “Decentralised R&D and strategic competitiveness: globalised approaches to generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises (MNEs)”, Research Policy, 28, pp. 157-178. Reguer, G. (2003): Linking corporate-wide global R&D activities. In Catwell and Molero (Eds): Multinational enterprises, innovative starategies and systems of innovation. Edward Elgar. Sánchez-Sellero, P., Roseel-Martínez, J and García-Vázquez, J. (2014): Absorptive capacity from foreign direct investment in Spanish manufacturin firms. International Business Review, 22. Santangello, G.D. (2012): “The tension of information sharing; Effects on subsidiary embeddedness”. International Business Review, 21. Singh, J. (2002): Knowledge diffusion and multinational firms: Evidence using patent citation data. Harvard Business School, Boston: 1-45. Schmidt, T. and Sofka, W. (2009), ‘Liability of foreignness as a barrier to knowledge spillovers: Lost in translation?’, Journal of International Management, 15 (4). Vega-Jurado, J., Gutiérrez-Garcia, A., and Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2009), ‘Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 18 (4). Zander, I (2015): Gone are the creatures of yesteryear? On the emergence and diffusion of technological capabilities in the modern MNC. Paper presented to the international workshop on the internationalization of innovation, Madrid. Institute of Research on innovation (IREIN), and Ramon Areces Foundation, Madrid. http://www.ireinnova.com/images/stories/Jornadas/Conferencias_2015.pdf. Zander, I. (2002): “The formation of international innovation networks in the multinational corporation: an evolutionary perspective”, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 11, 2.