Publication:
Impaired Mesopic Visual Acuity in Eyes with Early Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2012
Authors
Barrio de Santos, Ana Rosa
Gomez-Sanz, Fernando J
Clement-Corral, Amaya
Perez Carrasco, Maria Jesus
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Purpose.: To determine photopic and mesopic distance high-contrast visual acuity (HC-VA) and low-contrast visual acuity (LC-VA) in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods.: Measurements were made in 22 subjects with early AMD and 28 healthy control subjects. Inclusion criteria included a photopic HC-VA of 20/25 or better. Distance VA was measured using HC (96%) and LC (10%) Bailey-Lovie logMAR letter charts under photopic (85 cd/m2) and mesopic (0.1–0.2 cd/m2) luminance conditions. Results.: Mean mesopic distance HC-VA and LC-VA were significantly worse (0.1 logMAR and 0.28 logMAR, respectively) in the early AMD group than in the control group. Under mesopic conditions, the mean difference between LC-VA and HC-VA was significantly greater in the early AMD (0.45 logMAR) than the control group (0.27 logMAR). Mean differences between mesopic versus photopic HC-VA and mesopic versus photopic LC-VA were significantly greater in the early AMD than the control group (0.13 and 0.32 logMAR of difference between the means, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity were significantly greater for mesopic LC-VA than for mesopic HC-VA (Receiver Operating Characteristics, area under the curve [AUC], 0.94 ± 0.030 and 0.76 ± 0.067, respectively). AUC values for photopic HC-VA and LC-VA were below 0.70. Conclusions.: Visual acuity testing under low luminance conditions emerged as an optimal quantitative measure of retinal function in early AMD.
Description
Abierto en la web del editor
Keywords
Citation
1.Friedman DS O'Colmain BJ Munoz B Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol . 2004;122:564–572. 2.Bird AC Bressler NM Bressler SB An international classification and grading system for age-related maculopathy and age-related macular degeneration. The International ARM Epidemiological Study Group. Surv Ophthalmol . 1995;39:367–374. 3.Brown B Kitchin JL. Dark adaptation and the acuity/luminance response in senile macular degeneration (SMD). Am J Optom Physiol Opt . 1983;60:645–650. 4.Sunness JS Rubin GS Applegate CA Visual function abnormalities and prognosis in eyes with age-related geographic atrophy of the macula and good visual acuity. Ophthalmology . 1997;104:1677–1691. 5.Scilley K Jackson GR Cideciyan AV Maguire MG Jacobson SG Owsley C. Early age-related maculopathy and self-reported visual difficulty in daily life. Ophthalmology . 2002;109:1235–1242. 6.Neelam K Nolan J Chakravarthy U Beatty S. Psychophysical function in age-related maculopathy. Surv Ophthalmol . 2009;54:167–210. 7.Klein R Wang Q Klein BE Moss SE Meuer SM. The relationship of age-related maculopathy, cataract, and glaucoma to visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1995;36:182–191. 8.Petzold A Plant GT. Clinical disorders affecting mesopic vision. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt . 2006;26:326–341. 9.Curcio CA Owsley C Jackson GR. Spare the rods, save the cones in aging and age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 2000;41:2015–2018. 10.Feigl B Brown B Lovie-Kitchin J Swann P. The rod-mediated multifocal electroretinogram in aging and in early age-related maculopathy. Curr Eye Res . 2006;31:635–644. 11.Owsley C Jackson GR White M Feist R Edwards D. Delays in rod-mediated dark adaptation in early age-related maculopathy. Ophthalmology . 2001;108:1196–1202. 12.Scholl HP Bellmann C Dandekar SS Bird AC Fitzke FW. Photopic and scotopic fine matrix mapping of retinal areas of increased fundus autofluorescence in patients with age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 2004;45:574–583. 13.Feigl B Cao D Morris CP Zele AJ. Persons with age-related maculopathy risk genotypes and clinically normal eyes have reduced mesopic vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 2011;52:1145–1150. 14.Lovie-Kitchin J Feigl B. Assessment of age-related maculopathy using subjective vision tests. Clin Exp Optom . 2005;88:292–303. 15.Hogg RE Chakravarthy U. Visual function and dysfunction in early and late age-related maculopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res . 2006;25:249–276. 16.Schneck ME Haegerstrom-Portnoy G Lott LA Brabyn JA Gildengorin G. Low contrast vision function predicts subsequent acuity loss in an aged population: the SKI study. Vision Res . 2004;44:2317–2325. 17.Haegerstrom-Portnoy G. The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture 2003: Vision in elders--summary of findings of the SKI study. Optom Vis Sci . 2005;82:87–93. 18.Kleiner RC Enger C Alexander MF Fine SL. Contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol . 1988;106:55–57. 19.Lovie-Kitchin JE. High contrast and low contrast visual acuity in age related macular degeneration. Clin Exp Optom . 1989;72:79–83. 20.Abadi RV Pantazidou M. Low contrast letter acuity in age-related maculopathy. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt . 1996;16:455–459. 21.Feigl B Brown B Lovie-Kitchin J Swann P. Cone-mediated multifocal electroretinogram in early age-related maculopathy and its relationships with subjective macular function tests. Curr Eye Res . 2004;29:327–336. 22.Sunness JS Rubin GS Broman A Applegate CA Bressler NM Hawkins BS. Low luminance visual dysfunction as a predictor of subsequent visual acuity loss from geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology . 2008;115:1480–1488. 23.Chylack LT Jr Wolfe JK Singer DM The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol . 1993;111:831–836. 24.Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study system for classifying age-related macular degeneration from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: the Age-Related Eye Disease Study Report Number 6. Am J Ophthalmol . 2001;132:668–681. 25.Lovie-Kitchin J. Visual acuity measures in clinical research. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt . 1989;9:456. 26.Cho P Woo GC. Repeatability of the Waterloo four-contrast LogMAR visual acuity chart and near vision test card on a group of normal young adults. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt . 2004;24:427–435. 27.Leinonen J Laakkonen E Laatikainen L. Random measurement error in visual acuity measurement in clinical settings. Acta Ophthalmol Scand . 2005;83:328–332. 28.Arditi A Cagenello R. On the statistical reliability of letter-chart visual acuity measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1993;34:120–129. 29.Hazel CA Elliott DB. The dependency of LogMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule. Optom Vis Sci . 2002;79:788–792. 30.Applegate RA Marsack JD Thibos LN. Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci . 2006;83:635–640. 31.Linden A. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. J Eval Clin Pract . 2006;12:132–139. 32.Sarks JP Sarks SH Killingsworth MC. Evolution of geographic atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium. Eye (Lond) . 1988;2 (Pt 5):552–577. 33.Haegerstrom-Portnoy G Brabyn J Schneck ME Jampolsky A. The SKILL Card. An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci . 1997;38:207–218. 34.Feigl B Brown B Lovie-Kitchin J Swann P. Functional loss in early age-related maculopathy: the ischaemia postreceptoral hypothesis. Eye (Lond) . 2007;21:689–696.
Collections