Publication:
Wavefront reconstruction from tangential and sagittal curvature

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2014-12
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Optical Society Of America
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
In a previous contribution [Appl. Opt. 51, 8599 (2012)], a coauthor of this work presented a method for reconstructing the wavefront aberration from tangential refractive power data measured using dynamic skiascopy. Here we propose a new regularized least squares method where the wavefront is reconstructed not only using tangential but also sagittal curvature data. We prove that our new method provides improved quality reconstruction for typical and also for highly aberrated wavefronts, under a wide range of experimental error levels. Our method may be applied to any type of wavefront sensor (not only dynamic skiascopy) able to measure either just tangential or tangential plus sagittal curvature data.
Description
Received 6 October 2014; revised 5 November 2014; accepted 5 November 2014; posted 6 November 2014 (Doc. ID 224120); published 4 December 2014
Keywords
Citation
1. S. Barbero and L. N. Thibos, “Error analysis and correction in wavefront reconstruction from the transport-of-intensity equation,” Opt. Eng. 45, 094001 (2006). 2. F. Diaz-Douton, J. Pujol, M. Arjona, and S. O. Luque, “Curvature sensor for ocular wavefront measurement,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2245–2247 (2006). 3. C. Torti, S. Gruppetta, and L. Diaz-Santana, “Wavefront curvature sensing for the human eye,” J. Mod. Opt. 55, 691–702 (2008). 4. S. Barbero, J. Rubinstein, and L. N. Thibos, “Wavefront sensing and reconstruction from gradient and Laplacian data measured with a Hartmann–Shack sensor,” Opt. Lett. 31, 1845–1847 (2006). 5. W. Zou, K. Thompson, and J. Rolland, “Differential Shack–Hartmann curvature sensor: local principal curvature measurements,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25, 2331–2337 (2008). 6. S. MacRae and M. Fujieda, “Slit Skiascopic-guided ablation using the Nidek laser,” J. Refract. Surg. 16, S576–S580 (2000). 7. S. Barbero, “Wavefront aberration reconstruction from tangential refractive powers measured with spatial dynamic skiascopy,” Appl. Opt. 51, 8599–8605 (2012). 8. S. Barwick, “Least-squares estimation for hybrid curvature wavefront sensors,” Opt. Commun. 284, 2099–2108 (2011). 9. M. Fujieda and B. Yukinobu, “Ophthalmic measurement apparatus,” U.S. patent 7,296,896 (20 November 2007). 10. J. J. Stoker, Differential Geometry (Wiley-Interscience, 1969). 11. R. Burden, L. Faires, and J. Douglas, “Fixed-point iteration,” in Numerical Analysis (Brooks Cole, 1985). 12. T. O. Salmon and C. V. de Pol, “Normal-eye Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square wavefront errors,” J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 32, 2064–2074 (2006). 13. B. Y. Li, Z. Q. Wang, W. Wang, M. Liu, and W. Quan, “Effects of interactions among wave aberrations on optical image quality after refractive surgeries,” Optik 121, 127–131 (2010).
Collections