Publication: Myoring implantation alone versus corneal collagen cross-linking following myoring implantation for management of keratoconus: 1 year follow up
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2016
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Carbone Editions
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Purpose: To compare combined MyoRing implantation with previously corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL- MyoRing) versus MyoRing implantation alone in patients with keratoconus. Methods: This retrospective, comparative, cohort study included 33 eyes of 33 patients with keratoconus stage II and III according to Amsler-Krumeich classification. Two groups were performed for this study with 1 year follow up. The group 1 received MyoRing implantation and the group 2 received CXL approximately 12 months before MyoRing implantation. All patients had a complete pre and post-operative examination including visual, refractive and keratometry examinations. Results: In Group 1 at the end of follow up the mean UDVA and CDVA improved by 9 and 4 lines of logMAR. In Group 2 the mean UDVA and CDVA improved by 8 and 2 lines of logMAR. There was not observed a statistically significant difference between mean UDVA of two groups postoperatively (p = 0.142) whereas the mean CDVA in Group 2 was significantly better than mean Group 1 at the end of follow up (p= 0.018). Spherical equivalent error and refractive astigmatism were significantly reduced in both groups which no statistically significant differences was noted in these refractive parameters between two groups. The mean keratometric values also were reduced in both groups at the end of follow up which no statistically significant difference was observed between two groups. Conclusion: Both MyoRing implantation alone and combined MyoRing implantation with previously CXL were safe and effective methods for moderate and severe keratoconus and resulted in similar clinical outcomes after one year follow up. ExclusivelyMyoRing implantation alone demonstrated better outcome in mean CDVA.
Description
En Open Access en la web del editor.
Received February 05, 2016; Accepted March 02, 2016.
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
1) Tan, D.T. and Y.-M. Por, Current treatment options for corneal ectasia. Current opinion in ophthalmology, 2007. 18(4): p. 279-283.
2) Rabinowitz, Y.S., Keratoconus. Survey of ophthalmology, 1998. 42(4): p. 297-319.
3) Kennedy, R.H., W.M. Bourne, and J.A. Dyer, A 48-year clinical and epidemiologic study of keratoconus. American journal of ophthalmology, 1986. 101(3): p. 267-273.
4) Gordon-Shaag, A., M. Millodot, and E. Shneor, The epidemiology and etiology of keratoconus. Epidemiology, 2012. 70: p. 1.
5) Colin, J., et al., INTACS inserts for treating keratoconus: one-year results. Ophthalmology, 2001. 108(8): p. 1409-1414.
6) Siganos, D., et al., Ferrara intrastromal corneal rings for the correction of keratoconus. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2002. 28(11): p. 1947-1951.
7) Spoerl, E., M. Huhle, and T. Seiler, Induction of Crosslinks in Corneal Tissue. Experimental Eye Research, 1998. 66(1): p. 97-103.
8) Asbell, P.A. and Ö.Ö. Uçakhan, Long-term follow-up of Intacs from a single center. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2001. 27(9): p. 1456-1468.
9) Colin, J. and F.J. Malet, Intacs for the correction of keratoconus: two-year follow-up. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2007. 33(1): p. 69-74.
10) Bakshi, R., et al., Intra-Stromal Corneal Ring Segments. The Official Scientific Journal of Delhi Ophthalmological Society, 2013. 24(1): p. 16-22.
11) Daxer, A., Corneal intrastromal implantation surgery for the treatment of moderate and high myopia. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2008. 34(2): p. 194-198.
12) Daxer, A., Adjustable intracorneal ring in a lamellar pocket for keratoconus. J Refract Surg, 2010. 26(3): p. 217-221.
13) Mahmood, H., R. Venkateswaran, and A. Daxer, Implantation of a complete corneal ring in an intrastromal pocket for keratoconus. J Refract Surg, 2011. 27(1): p. 63-68.
14) Jankov Ii, M.R., et al., Corneal Collagen CrossLinking. Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010. 17(1): p. 21-27.
15) Asri, D., et al., Corneal collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus: Multicenter results from the French National Reference Center for Keratoconus. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2011. 37(12): p. 2137-2143.
16) Raiskup, F., A. Hoyer, and E. Spoerl, Permanent corneal haze after riboflavin-UVA-induced cross-linking in keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2009. 25(9): p. S824.
17) Coskunseven, E., et al., Effect of treatment sequence in combined intrastromal corneal rings and corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2009. 35(12): p. 2084-2091.
18) Zeraid, F.M., et al., Visual rehabilitation in low-moderate keratoconus: intracorneal ring segment implantation followed by same-day topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy and collagen cross linking. International journal of ophthalmology, 2014. 7(5): p. 800.
19) Parker, J.S., K. van Dijk, and G.R.J. Melles, Treatment options for advanced keratoconus: A review. Survey of ophthalmology, 2015. In press.
20) Studeny, P., D. Krizova, and Z. Stranak, Clinical Outcomes after Complete Intracorneal Ring Implantation and Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in an Intrastromal Pocket in One Session for Keratoconus. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014. 2014: p. 5.
21) Alio, J.L., D.P. Piñero, and A. Daxer, Clinical outcomes after complete ring implantation in corneal ectasia using the femtosecond technology: a pilot study. Ophthalmology, 2011. 118(7): p. 1282-1290.
22) Daxer, A., MyoRing for central and noncentral keratoconus. International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases, 2012. 1: p. 117-119.
23) Jabbarvand, M., et al., Continuous Corneal Intrastromal Ring Implantation for Treatment of Keratoconus in an Iranian Population. American journal of ophthalmology, 2013. 155(5): p. 837-842.e2.
24) Mojaled Nobari, S., C. Villena, and K. Jadidi, Predictability, Stability and Safety of MyoRing Implantation in Keratoconic Eyes During One Year Follow-Up. Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014. 26(3): p. 136-143.
25) Mojaled Nobari, S., C. Villena, and K. Jadidi, FullRing Intracorneal Implantation in Corneas With Pellucid Marginal Degeneration. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 2015. 17(12).
26) Ashwin, P.T. and P.J. McDonnell, Collagen cross-linkage: a comprehensive review and directions for future research. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2010. 94(8): p. 965-970.
27) Raiskup, F., et al., Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in progressive keratoconus: Ten-year results. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2008. 41(1): p. 41-46.
28) Raiskup-Wolf, F., et al., Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: Longterm results. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2008. 34(5): p. 796-801.
29) Wollensak, G., E. Spoerl, and T. Seiler, Riboflavin/ultraviolet a induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. American journal of ophthalmology, 2003. 135(5): p. 620-627.
30) Daxer, A., Corneal thickness after MyoRing implantation for keratoconus. International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases, 2014. 3(1): p. 15.
31) Agrawal, V.B., Corneal collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light for keratoconus: Results in Indian eyes. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009. 57(2): p. 111-114.
32) Wittig-Silva, C., et al., A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Progressive Keratoconus: Three-Year Results. Ophthalmology, 2014. 121(4): p. 812-821.
33) Chunyu, T., et al., Corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific reports, 2014. 4.
34) Spoerl, E., et al., Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using Ocular Response Analyzer software. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2011. 27(6): p. 452-457.
35) Spoerl, E., et al., Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes. Der Ophthalmologe: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2009. 106(6): p. 512-520.
36) Pinero, D.P., et al., Corneal biomechanical changes after intracorneal ring segment implantation in keratoconus. Cornea, 2012. 31(5): p. 491-499.
37) Chan, C.C., M. Sharma, and B.S.B. Wachler, Effect of inferior-segment Intacs with and without C3-R on keratoconus. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2007. 33(1): p. 75-80.
38) Coskunseven, E., et al., One-Year Results of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation (KeraRing) using Femtosecond Laser in Patients with Keratoconus. American journal of ophthalmology, 2008. 145(5): p. 775-779.e1.
39) Renesto, A., et al., Sequential topical riboflavin with or without ultraviolet a radiation with delayed intracorneal ring segment insertion for keratoconus. American journal of ophthalmology, 2012. 153(5): p. 982-993. e3.
40) Legare, M.E., et al., Intacs with or without same-day corneal collagen cross-linking to treat corneal ectasia. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology/Journal Canadien d'Ophtalmologie, 2013. 48(3): p. 173-178.
41) Daxer, A. and P. Fratzl, Collagen fibril orientation in the human corneal stroma and its implication in keratoconus. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 1997. 38(1): p. 121-129.