Publication: La evolución de la libertad de expresión y el derecho a la información en la España constitucional. Relevancia de la jurisprudencia en la profesión periodística
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2017-04-04
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
La libertad de expresión y el derecho a la información son derechos fundamentales que ampara la Constitución Española, indispensables para el desempeño de la actividad periodística libre. El encuadre de esta investigación se fija en su evolución dentro del marco legítimo y en los límites que los derechos de la personalidad oponen al desarrollo de esas libertades. El análisis de sentencias y noticias nos acercará a los objetivos de esta tesis que pasan por determinar la importancia de la jurisprudencia en la profesión periodística como cuasi fuente de derecho y la necesidad de la creación de un estatuto periodístico que cubra el vacío legal existente y autorregule la profesión con su propia normativa. JUSTIFICACIÓN: RAZONES DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN La certeza de que pocos estudiantes de periodismo, e incluso reporteros en activo, saben lo que pueden o no expresar en un medio de comunicación sirvió de motor para el inicio de esta investigación. No todo está permitido y traspasar la legalidad genera conflictos que se dirimen en los tribunales. Es cierto que el asunto de la colisión entre estos derechos fundamentales se ha tratado en diversas publicaciones, pero no lo es menos que su enfoque era meramente jurídico y no periodístico. Desde este punto de partida se consideró necesario averiguar quién fijaba las lindes de estos derechos de tan indeterminado contenido, y se decidió revisar la legislación al respecto. La sorpresa fue descubrir que apenas hay normas que lo regulen, salvo la Constitución, y ha debido ser la jurisprudencia de los Altos Tribunales quien marque el camino de la buena práctica periodística. El análisis de la doctrina jurisprudencial al respecto nos ha hecho llegar a la conclusión de que ésta es absolutamente determinante en la profesión periodística...
Freedom of expression and the right to information are fundamental rights under the Spanish Constitution, essential for the performance of free journalism. The frame of this research is set in its evolution within the legitimate framework and limits the rights of the individual against the development of these freedoms. The analysis of statements and news bring us closer to the goals of this thesis that go to determine the importance of jurisprudence in journalism as quasi source of law and the need for the creation of a journalistic statute covering the existing legal vacuum and self-regulation the profession with its own rules. JUSTIFICATION: REASONS FOR RESEARCH The certainty that few journalism students, and even reporters in active, know what may or may not be expressed in a media served as the engine for starting this research. Not everything is allowed and transfer the legality generates conflicts are resolved in court. It is true that the issue of the collision between these fundamental rights has been discussed in several publications, but the fact remains that their approach was not merely legal and journalistic. From this starting point it was considered necessary to find out who was setting the boundaries of these rights as indeterminate content, and decided to review the legislation. The surprise was that hardly rules governing it, except the Constitution and must have been the jurisprudence of the High Courts who mark the way of good journalistic practice. The analysis of the case law in this regard has led us to the conclusion that this is absolutely crucial in the journalistic profession...
Freedom of expression and the right to information are fundamental rights under the Spanish Constitution, essential for the performance of free journalism. The frame of this research is set in its evolution within the legitimate framework and limits the rights of the individual against the development of these freedoms. The analysis of statements and news bring us closer to the goals of this thesis that go to determine the importance of jurisprudence in journalism as quasi source of law and the need for the creation of a journalistic statute covering the existing legal vacuum and self-regulation the profession with its own rules. JUSTIFICATION: REASONS FOR RESEARCH The certainty that few journalism students, and even reporters in active, know what may or may not be expressed in a media served as the engine for starting this research. Not everything is allowed and transfer the legality generates conflicts are resolved in court. It is true that the issue of the collision between these fundamental rights has been discussed in several publications, but the fact remains that their approach was not merely legal and journalistic. From this starting point it was considered necessary to find out who was setting the boundaries of these rights as indeterminate content, and decided to review the legislation. The surprise was that hardly rules governing it, except the Constitution and must have been the jurisprudence of the High Courts who mark the way of good journalistic practice. The analysis of the case law in this regard has led us to the conclusion that this is absolutely crucial in the journalistic profession...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias de la Información, Sección Departamental de Sociología IV (Métodos de la Investigación y Teoría de la Comunicación), leída el 26-01-2016