Publication: Evaluación de las características anatómicas y visibilidad de conductos y forámenes accesorios en mandíbula mediante tomografía computarizada de haz cónico.
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2016
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
1. Kiljunen T, Kaasalainen T, Suomalainen A, Kortesniemi M. Dental cone beam CT: A review. Phys Medica [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2015;31(8):844–60.
2. Scarfe WC, Farman a G, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(1):75–80.
3. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2016 Apr 23];8(9):1558–64.
4. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 1999;28(4):245–8.
5. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(6):609–25.
6. Kamburoglu K. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol [Internet]. 2009;30(6):1088–95.
7. Feldkamp L a., Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A. 1984;1(6):612.
8. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic Applications of Cone-Beam Volumetric Tomography. J Endod. 2007;33(9):1121–32.
9. Aminoshariae A, Su A, Kulild JC. Determination of the Location of the Mental Foramen: A Critical Review. J Endod [Internet]. 2014;40(4):471–5.
10. Gupta J, Ali SP. Cone beam computed tomography in oral implants. Natl J Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2013;4(1):2–6.
11. Soares MR, Batista WO, Antonio P de L, Caldas LVE, Maia AF. Study of effective dose of various protocols in equipment cone beam CT. SI Proc XIV Int Symp SOLID STATEDOSIMETRY [Internet]. 2015;100:21–6.
12. Soares MR, Batista WO, de Lara Antonio P, Caldas LVE, Maia AF. Effective dose comparison between stitched and single FOV in CBCT protocols for complete dental arcade. Radiat Phys Chem [Internet]. Elsevier; 2015;110:72–6.
13. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology [Internet]. 2008;106(1):106–14.
14. Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Kondo S, Ariji E. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology [Internet]. 2010;109(1):e25–31.
15. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(3):461–8.
16. Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130(2):257–65.
17. Tamimi D, ElSaid K. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Dental Impactions. Semin Orthod [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;15(1):57–62.
18. Uzun I, Gunduz K, Celenk P, Avsever H, Orhan K, Canitezer G, et al. Comparing the effect of different voxel resolutions for assessment of vertical root fracture of permanent teeth. Iran J Radiol. 2015;12(3):1–7.
19. Creanga AG, Geha H, Sankar V, Teixeira FB, McMahan CA, Noujeim M. Accuracy of digital periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in detecting external root resorption. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015;45(3):153–8.
20. Sarment DP, Christensen AM. The use of cone beam computed tomography in forensic radiology. J Forensic Radiol Imaging [Internet]. Elsevier; 2014;2(4):173–81.
21. Eshak M, Brooks S, Abdel-Wahed N, Edwards PC. Cone beam CT evaluation of the presence of anatomic accessory canals in the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol [Internet]. Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Minia University, Minya, Egypt.: British Institute of Radiology; 2014;43(4):20130259.
22. Von Arx T, Matter D, Buser D, Bornstein MM. Evaluation of location and dimensions of lingual foramina using limited cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;69(11):2777–85.
23. Parnia F, Moslehifard E, Hafezeqoran A, Mahboub F, Mojaver-Kahnamoui H. Characteristics of anatomical landmarks in the mandibular interforaminal region: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal [Internet]. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.: Medicina Oral S.L; 2012 Jan;17(3):e420–5.
24. Kang J-H, Lee K-S, Oh M-G, Choi H-Y, Lee S-R, Oh S-H, et al. The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent [Internet]. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiol: Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology; 2014;44(1):53–60.
25. Katakami K, Mishima A, Shiozaki K, Shimoda S, Hamada Y, Kobayashi K. Characteristics of Accessory Mental Foramina Observed on Limited Cone-beam Computed Tomography Images. J Endod [Internet]. 2008;34(12):1441–5.
26. Sekerci AE, Sisman Y, Payveren MA. Evaluation of location and dimensions of mandibular lingual foramina using cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36(9):857–64.
27. Sheikhi M, Mosavat F, Ahmadi A. Assessing the anatomical variations of lingual foramen and its bony canals with CBCT taken from 102 patients in Isfahan. Dent Res J (Isfahan) [Internet]. 2012;9(Suppl 1):S45–51.
28. von Arx T, Hänni A, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein MM. Radiographic Study of the Mandibular Retromolar Canal: An Anatomic Structure with Clinical Importance. J Endod [Internet]. 2011;37(12):1630–5.
29. Han S-S, Park C-S. Cone beam CT findings of retromolar canals: Report of cases and literature review. Imaging Sci Dent [Internet]. 2013;43(4):309–12.
30. Ossenberg NS. Retromolar foramen of the human mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol [Internet]. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company; 1987 May [cited 2016 May 1];73(1):119–28.
31. Kaufman E, Serman NJ, Wang PD. Bilateral mandibular accessory foramina and canals: a case report and review of the literature. Dentomaxillofac Radiol [Internet]. Division of Periodontics, Columbia University, School of Dental and Oral Surgery, New York, New York, USA.: British Institute of Radiology; 2000;29(3):170–5.
32. Pyle MA, Jasinevicius TR, Lalumandier JA, Kohrs KJ, Sawyer DR. Prevalence and implications of accessory retromolar foramina in clinical dentistry. Gen Dent [Internet]. Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Case Western Reserve University School of Dentistry, Cleveland 44106-4905, USA.: Academy of General Dentistry; 1999;47(5):500–3.
33. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Accessory mental foramen assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology [Internet]. 2009;107(2):289–94.
34. Perea-Pérez B, Labajo-González E, Santiago-Sáez A, Albarrán-Juan E, Villa-Vigil A. Analysis of 415 adverse events in dental practice in Spain from 2000 to 2010. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19(5):e500–5.
35. Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop [Internet]. American Association of Orthodontists; 2010;137(4):S100–8.
36. Bürklein S, Grund C, Sch??fer E. Relationship between Root Apices and the Mandibular Canal: A Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis in a German Population. J Endod. 2015;41(10):1696–700.
37. Kawai T, Asaumi R, Sato I. Cone beam computed tomography observations of the lingual foramina and their bony canals in the median region of the mandible. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011;52(3):827–9.
38. Miller RJ, Edwards WC, Boudet C, Cohen JH. Maxillofacial anatomy: the mandibular symphysis. J Oral Implantol [Internet]. Department of Oral Implantology, Atlantic Coast Dental Research Clinic, Palm Beach, FL, USA. drrjmiller1@aol.com: American Academy Of Implant Dentistry; 2011;37(6):745–53.
39. Murlimanju B, Prakash K, Samiullah D, Prabhu L, Pai M, Vadgaonkar R, et al. Accessory neurovascular foramina on the lingual surface of mandible: Incidence, topography, and clinical implications. Indian J Dent Res [Internet]. Mangalore: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd; 2012;23(3):433.
40. Wang Y, Pan YJW, Evaluation CC. Evaluation of location and dimensions of mandibular lingual canals : a cone beam computed tomography study. 2015;(Mlc):1197–203.
41. Liang X, Jacobs R, Lambrichts I. An assessment on spiral CT scan of the superior and inferior genial spinal foramina and canals. Surg Radiol Anat [Internet]. Paris: Springer-Verlag; 2006;28(1):98–104.
42. Trikeriotis D, Paravalou E, Diamantopoulos P, Nikolaou D. Anterior mandible canal communications : a potential portal of entry for tumour spread. 2008;125–9.
43. Imada TSN, Fernandes LMP da SR, Centurion BS, de Oliveira-Santos C, Hon??rio HM, Rubira-Bullen IRF. Accessory mental foramina: Prevalence, position and diameter assessed by cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(2):1–6.
44. Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Suárez-Quintanilla JA, Fernández-Alonso A, Varela-Mallou J, Suárez-Cunqueiro MM. Anatomical characteristics and visibility of mental foramen and accessory mental foramen: Panoramic radiography vs. cone beam CT. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(6):e707–14.
45. Muinelo-Lorenzo J, Suárez-Quintanilla JA, Fernández-Alonso A, Marsillas-Rascado S, Suárez-Cunqueiro MM. Descriptive study of the bifid mandibular canals and retromolar foramina: Cone beam CT vs panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2014;43(5):7–13.
46. Rouas P, Nancy J, Bar D. Identification of double mandibular canals: literature review and three case reports with CT scans and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2007;36:34–8.
47. Sanchis JM, Peñarrocha M, Soler F. Bifid mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(4):422–4.
48. Zografos J, Kolokoudias M, Papadakis E. [The types of the mandibular canal]. To Hellēniko Period gia stomatikē gnathoprosōpikē Cheir / episēmo organo tēs Hetaireias Stomatognathoprosōpikēs Cheir = Greek J oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 1990 Mar [cited 2016 Aug 9];5(1):17–20.
49. Langlais RP, Broadus R, Glass BJ. Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc [Internet]. Elsevier; 1985 Jun [cited 2016 Aug 9];110(6):923–6.
50. Oliveira-Santos C, Capelozza ALÁ, Dezzoti MSG, Fischer CM, Poleti ML, Rubira-Bullen IRF. Visibility of the mandibular canal on CBCT cross-sectional images. J Appl Oral Sci [Internet]. 2011;19(3):240–3.
51. Neves FS, Nascimento MCC, Oliveira ML, Almeida SM, Bóscolo FN. Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014 Dec 24 [cited 2016 Jun 15];18(4):419–24.
52. Von Arx T, Friedli M, Sendi P, Lozanoff S, Bornstein MM. Location and dimensions of the mental foramen: A radiographic analysis by using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2013;39(12):1522–8.