Publication: Los límites del deber de obediencia del trabajador en la relación de trabajo: la objeción de conciencia y otros derechos de "resistencia"
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2018-06-08
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Las normas reguladoras de un Estado de Derecho, no siempre tienen la misma acogida en todos los miembros que componen la sociedad. Algunos componentes de la comunidad, en ocasiones, tienen la necesidad de manifestar una oposición al mandato de las normas por motivos de conciencia. La posesión de una serie de valores, les muestra unas discrepancias con los mandatos exigidos, como resultado de encontrar un desequilibrio entre la ley y los principios mediante los cuales debería de regirse una sociedad. Los sujetos que tienen esta particular forma de comportamiento, argumentan en su descargo, que sus actuaciones se derivan de una serie de creencias de las que se enriquece su conciencia interior, sintiéndose más realizado al estar obedeciendo a su moralidad que a la ley, a una determinada ley. Esta actitud es individual, aunque en ocasiones pueda existir una exposición de grupo al encontrarse con una serie de valores que se comparten con ocasión de un ideal predeterminado. El problema surge cuando se enuncia un principio general, cual es que, en un Estado democrático, las leyes se han de acatar por parte de los ciudadanos, por todos los ciudadanos, como consecuencia de que la legislación protege el interés general. Pero de este postulado no hay que excluir la posibilidad que ciertas personas, no encuentren este provechoso fin que comparte el resto de la población. Esta interpretación de la norma y también de la organización de la sociedad, con arreglo a como su conciencia le dicta, en determinados momentos producirá un conflicto cuando la norma y la conciencia no están en sintonía. Esto supone un problema para el individuo: obedecer la norma va en contra de su conciencia y obedecer a su conciencia va en contra de la norma. Cuando el individuo llega a esta encrucijada, habitualmente se inclina por obedecer lo que su conciencia le dicta. Este conflicto se resolverá mediante un proceso coercitivo sobre el objetor para que cumpla la ley, pero se ha de advertir inicialmente que puede suceder que, por diversos motivos, el legislador admita una objeción de conciencia, pero no en todos los momentos y casos. También es oportuno informar que, mientras esto pueda producirse, son los Tribunales de justicia los que conocerán del enfrentamiento, pudiendo resolver en base a una serie de principios jurídicos congruentes...
The rules governing a Rule of Law do not always have the same reception in all the members of the society. Some components of the community sometimes need to express opposition to the mandate of the rules for reasons of conscience. The beliefs on a series of values show them discrepancies with the required mandates, as a result of finding an imbalance between the law and the principles which should govern a society. Individuals who have this particular form of behaviour, argue in their defence that their actions are derived from a series of beliefs enriching their inner conscience, feeling more accomplished by obeying their morality than obeying the law, a specific law. This attitude is individual, although sometimes there may be a group exhibition when jointly meeting with a series of shared values on the occasion of a predetermined ideology. The problem arises when referring to a general principle, as it is that in a democratic State, laws must be followed by citizens, by all citizens, and as a consequence that legislation protects the public interest. But this postulate should not exclude the possibility that certain people do not find this beneficial purpose shared by the rest of the population. This interpretation of the norm and also the organization of the society, in accordance with consciencés dictates, sometimes will produce a conflict when the norm and consciousness are not in tune. This is a problem for the individual: obey the rule goes against his conscience and obeying his conscience goes against the norm. When the individual reaches this dilemma, usually goes towards obeying their conscience dictates. This conflict will be resolved by a coercive process over the objector so that it meets the law, but it must be initially warned it may happen that, for various reasons, the legislator supports an objection of conscience, but not in every moment and in all cases. It is also relevant to inform that, while this might occur, the courts are who will know of the conflict, and may resolve on the basis of a series of consistent legal principles. This recognition by the State powers is determined by understanding the individual suffering when reaching the objector position. The mechanisms operated by the State when it knows these situations, are justified because there is no evil in the "disobedient" action, since there should be no confusion with a civil disobedient. Civil disobedience is the claim of a particular social group, which does not agree with a particular rule of law and therefore proceed operating towards forcing the Legislative power to overturn such law. Among the existing forms to achieve this goal would be the group protest, mobilization, even reaching the active violence, with the intent of this rule being abolished. The conscientious objector does not seek the abolition of the rule, just tries to be excluded from the obligation to obey it...
The rules governing a Rule of Law do not always have the same reception in all the members of the society. Some components of the community sometimes need to express opposition to the mandate of the rules for reasons of conscience. The beliefs on a series of values show them discrepancies with the required mandates, as a result of finding an imbalance between the law and the principles which should govern a society. Individuals who have this particular form of behaviour, argue in their defence that their actions are derived from a series of beliefs enriching their inner conscience, feeling more accomplished by obeying their morality than obeying the law, a specific law. This attitude is individual, although sometimes there may be a group exhibition when jointly meeting with a series of shared values on the occasion of a predetermined ideology. The problem arises when referring to a general principle, as it is that in a democratic State, laws must be followed by citizens, by all citizens, and as a consequence that legislation protects the public interest. But this postulate should not exclude the possibility that certain people do not find this beneficial purpose shared by the rest of the population. This interpretation of the norm and also the organization of the society, in accordance with consciencés dictates, sometimes will produce a conflict when the norm and consciousness are not in tune. This is a problem for the individual: obey the rule goes against his conscience and obeying his conscience goes against the norm. When the individual reaches this dilemma, usually goes towards obeying their conscience dictates. This conflict will be resolved by a coercive process over the objector so that it meets the law, but it must be initially warned it may happen that, for various reasons, the legislator supports an objection of conscience, but not in every moment and in all cases. It is also relevant to inform that, while this might occur, the courts are who will know of the conflict, and may resolve on the basis of a series of consistent legal principles. This recognition by the State powers is determined by understanding the individual suffering when reaching the objector position. The mechanisms operated by the State when it knows these situations, are justified because there is no evil in the "disobedient" action, since there should be no confusion with a civil disobedient. Civil disobedience is the claim of a particular social group, which does not agree with a particular rule of law and therefore proceed operating towards forcing the Legislative power to overturn such law. Among the existing forms to achieve this goal would be the group protest, mobilization, even reaching the active violence, with the intent of this rule being abolished. The conscientious objector does not seek the abolition of the rule, just tries to be excluded from the obligation to obey it...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Derecho, Departamento de Derecho del Trabajo, leída el 10-07-2017