Publication: La economía política institucional: balance y perspectivas
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2016
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Los recientes debates sobre el papel de las instituciones en el desarrollo han mostrado la existencia de dos grandes corrientes teóricas en lo que al pensamiento institucionalista se refiere: la “Nueva Economía Institucional” y la “Economía Política Institucionalista”. La primera, encabezada por premios Nobel de Economía como Ronald Coase, Douglass North, Oliver Williamson y Elinor Ostrom, ha sido ampliamente analizada y documentada. En cuanto a la Economía Política Institucionalista, aún puede apreciarse un vacío importante de contribuciones académicas que analicen sus raíces y sus principales aportaciones. El presente artículo trata de superar, en parte, esta laguna mostrando las aportaciones principales de la que, a juicio de algunos autores, puede considerarse como la única corriente “explícitamente institucionalista”, la Economía Política Institucional (EPI), que se sitúa en torno a la obra de Ha-Joon Chang. El objetivo del trabajo es doble: ofrecer una aproximación a la EPI y realizar una propuesta de clasificación de las instituciones a partir de las contribuciones de sus principales autores.
The recent debates on the role of institutions in development are revealing two major theoretical currents: the “New Institutional Economics” and the “Institutional Political Economy”. The New Institutional Economics, whose most notable representatives are Nobel prizes Ronald Coase, Douglass North, Oliver Williamson and Elinor Ostrom, have been thoroughly examined and analyzed. There is however in the Institutional Political Economy (IPE) an important void of academic works that analyze its roots and its main contributions. This paper tries to fill this gap in that literature. The main goal of this paper is twofold: to offer an approximation of IPE and to suggest a classification and an interpretation of institutions, incorporating the perspectives of the main figures in the field.
The recent debates on the role of institutions in development are revealing two major theoretical currents: the “New Institutional Economics” and the “Institutional Political Economy”. The New Institutional Economics, whose most notable representatives are Nobel prizes Ronald Coase, Douglass North, Oliver Williamson and Elinor Ostrom, have been thoroughly examined and analyzed. There is however in the Institutional Political Economy (IPE) an important void of academic works that analyze its roots and its main contributions. This paper tries to fill this gap in that literature. The main goal of this paper is twofold: to offer an approximation of IPE and to suggest a classification and an interpretation of institutions, incorporating the perspectives of the main figures in the field.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
Albert, Michel. 1991. Capitalism vs. Capitalism. New York, Four Walls Eight Windows.
Alt, Jamen. y Shepsle, Kenneth. (eds.) 1990. Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Bardhan, Pranab. 2001. Deliberative Conflicts, Collective Action and Institutional Economics. En Meier, G. and Stiglitz J. (eds.), Frontiers of Development Economics: the Future in Perspective. New York, Oxford University Press, 269-290.
Berger, Suzanne. y Dore, Ronald P. 1996. National Diversity and Global Capitalism. New York, Cornell University Press.
Block, Fred. 2000. Deconstructing capitalism as a system. Rethinking Marxism, 12 (3), 83-98.
Bronfenbrenner, U. 1986. Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22 (6), 723-742.
Bronfenbrenner, Urie and Morris, Pamela. 1998. The ecology of developmental processes. En Damon, W. y Lerner, R.M. (eds.), Handbook of child psychology, vol. 1, 993-1023. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Buchanan, James. 1986. Liberty, Market and State. Brighton, Wheatsheaf Books Ltd.
Burlamaqui, Leonardo; Castro, Ana Celia. y Chang Ha-Joon. (ed) (2000). Institutions and the role of State. Chentelham, Edward Elgar.
Burton, John. 1983. Picking Losers…?: The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. London, Institute of Economic Affairs.
Case, Robbie. y Okamoto, Yukari. 1996. The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 246 (6), 1-26.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2011. Institutions and Economic Development: Theory, Policy and History. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(4), 473-498.
Chang, Ha-Joon. (ed.). 2007. Institutional Change and Economic Development. London, Anthems Press.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 1994a. State, Institutions, and Structural Change, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 5(2), 293-313.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 1994b. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. London and Basingstoke, Macmillan.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2000. An Institutionalist Perspective on the Role of the State –Towards an Institutionalist Political Economy. En Burlamaqui, L.; Castro, A. y Chang, H-J. (eds.), Institutions and the Role of the State, 3-26. Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2002a. Breaking the Mould – An Institutionalist Political Economy Alternative to the NeoLiberal Theory of the Market and the State. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26 (5), 539–559.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2002b. Kicking away the ladder: development strategy in historical perspective. London, Anthem Press.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2005. Globalization, Global Standards and the Future of East Asia. Global Economic Review, 34(4), 363–378.
Chang, Ha-Joon y Evans, Peter. 2005. The Role of Institutions in Economic Change. En Dymski Gary y Da Paula, Silvina (eds.), Reimagining Growth. London, Zed Press, 99-129.
Chang, Ha-Joon. y Rowthorn, Rowthorn 1995. Role of the State in Economic Change – Entrepreneurshipand Conflict Management. En Chang, H.-J. y Rowthorn, R. (eds.), The Role of the State in Economic Change. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 31-50.
Di John, John. 2004. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Venezuela, 1920-1998. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Economics University of Cambridge.
Ellerman, David. 1999. Helping Others to Help Themselves: The Challenge of AutonomyCompatible Development Assistance.Washington DC, World Bank.
Epstein, Gerald. 2006. Central Banks as Agents of Economic Development. WIDER Research Papar, 2006-54. Helsinki, UNU-WIDER.
Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Evans, Peter. 2007. Extending the institutional turn: property, politics, and development trajectories. En Chang, Ha-Joon (ed.), Institutional Change and Economic Development. London, Anthems Press, 35-52.
Flavell, John H. 1992. Cognitive Development: Past, Present and Future. Developmental Psychology, 28 (2), 191-204.
Frey, Bruno. 1997. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar. Galbraith, James K. 1955. The affluent society. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
Frey, Bruno. (1967). The new industrial State. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
Frey, Bruno. (1987). A history of economics: The past as the present. London, H. Hamilton.
García-Quero, Fernando. 2013. Desarrollo y economía política institucionalista: una reinterpretación del comportamiento, el estado, la política y el cambio institucional. Tesis doctoral. Granada, Editorial Universidad de Granada.
García-Quero, Fernando y López Castellano, Fernando. (2011). Other institutionalism for Development Studies, Real-world Economics Review, 58(12), 126-133.
Greif, Avner. 2006. Institutions and the path to modern economy: lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Hayek, Friedrich. 1949. Individualism and Economic Order. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1988. Economics and Institutions: a manifesto for a modern institutional economics. Cambridge, Policy Press.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1993. Economics and Evolution. Cambridge, Policy Press.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. (1998). The Approach of Institutional Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (1), 166-92.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2001. How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London, Routledge.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2004a. The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism. London, Routledge.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2004b. Darwinism, causality and the social sciences, Journal of Economic Methodology, 2 (2), 175-194.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2006. What are Institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40 (1), 1–25.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2007. The Revival of Veblenian Institutional Economics, Journal of Economic Issues; 41 (2), 325-340.
Hodgson, Geoffrey. y Knudsen, Thorbjørn. 2004. The Complex Evolution of a simple Traffic convention: the functions and implications of habit, Journal of Economics Behaviour and Organizations, 54 (1), 19-47.
Kapp, K.William. 1968. In Defense of Institutionalism. Swedish Journal of Economics, 70 (1), 1-18.
Lazonick, William. 2006. Corporate Governance, Innovate Enterprise, and Economic Development, WIDER Research Paper 2006-71, Helsinki, UNU-WIDER.
Lazonick, William. 1991. Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy. Cambridge, Nueva York, University Press.
Lewis, Orion y Steinmo, Sven. 2011. Tomemos en serio la evolución: Análisis institucional y teoría evolutiva. Revista de Economía Institucional, 13 (24), 111–151.
List, Friedrich. 1885 [1841]. The National System of Political Economy. London, Green and Company.
López Castellano, Fernando y García-Quero, Fernando 2012. Institutional approaches to economic development: The current status of the debate, Journal of Economic Issues, 46 (4), 921-940.
López Castellano, Fernando y García-Quero, Fernando 2013. Instituciones y desarrollo: perspectivas desde la heterodoxia. En Arias, X. C. y Caballero, G. (eds.), Nuevo institucionalismo: gobernanza, economía y políticas públicas, 81-102. Madrid, CIS-Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Mayhew, Anne. 1989. Contrasting origins of the two institutionalisms: the social science context. Review of Political Economy, 1(3), 319-333.
March, James. y Olsen, Johan. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York, The Free Press.
Mantzavinos, Chrysostomoa; North, Douglass. y Shariq, Syed. 2004. Learning, institutions and economic performance. Perspectives on Politics, 2 (1), 75-84.
North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional change and Economic Performance. New York, Cambridge University Press.
North, Douglass. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Olson, Mancur. 1996. Big bills left on the sidewalk: why some nations are rich and others poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2), 3-24.
Parke, Ross; Ornstein, Peter.; Riesesm, John. y Zahn-Waxler, Carolyn. 1994 A Century on Development Psychology. Washington DC, American Psychological Association.
Piaget, Jean. 1977. The development of thought: equilibration of cognitive structures. California, Viking Press University of California.
Polanyi, Karl . 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston, Massachusetts, Beacon Press.
Reinert, Erik. 1995. Competitiveness and its predecessors: a 500 years Cross national Perspective. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6(1), 23-42.
Reinert, Erik. 2004. Globalization, Economic Development and Inequality: An alternative Perspective. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Reinert, Erik. 2006. Institutionalism Ancient, Old and New: A Historical Perspective on Institutions and Uneven Development. World Institute for Economic Development Research (UNU-WIDER), United Nation University, Research Paper 2006/77.
Reinert, Erik. 2007. How Rich Countries Got Rich … and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. London, Constable & Robinson.
Rutherford, Malcolm. 1994. Institutions in Economics–the old and the new institutionalism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Schmoller, Gustav. 1910 [1884]. The journal Schmoller´s Jahrbuch. The Mercantile System and its Historical Significance. Nueva York, Mamillan.
Simon, Herbert. 1983. Reasons in Human Behaviour. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
Sperry, Roger W. 1991. In Defense of Mentalism and Emergent Interaction. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 12 (2), 221–46.
Toboso, Fernando. 1997. ¿En qué se diferencian los Enfoques de Análisis de la vieja y la nueva Economía Institucional? Hacienda Pública Española, 143, 175-192.
Veblen, Thorstein. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class. An Economic Study in the evolution of Institutions. New York, Mcmillan Company.
Veblen, Thorstein. 1914. The instinct of Workmanship, and the State of the industrial Art. New York, Mcmicllan.
Vira, Bhaskar. 1997. The political Coase theorem: Identifying differences between neoclassical and critical institutionalism, Journal of Economic Issues, 31 (3), 761-780.
Williamson, Oliver E. 2000. The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead, Journal of Economic Literature, 38 (3), 595-613.
Woo-Cumings, Meredith J. 1999. The Developmental State. New York, Cornell University Press.