Universidad Complutense de Madrid
E-Prints Complutense

Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a spherical and a toric trifocal intraocular lens

Impacto

Descargas

Último año

Poyales Galán, Francisco y Garzón Jiménez, Nuria (2018) Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a spherical and a toric trifocal intraocular lens. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery . 11 p.. ISSN 1873-4502 (En prensa)

[img] PDF (Postprint)
Restringido a Sólo personal autorizado del repositorio hasta 27 Septiembre 2019.
Creative Commons License
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada.

2MB

URL Oficial: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.025




Resumen

Purpose: To evaluate visual outcomes and satisfaction after implantation of 2 trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): a spherical IOL and a toric IOL.
Setting: IOA Madrid Innova Ocular, Madrid, Spain.
Design: Prospective, controlled clinical trial.
Methods: Patients (>50 years) were implanted bilaterally with either a trifocal spherical hydrophilic IOL (FineVision POD F) if corneal astigmatism was 1.0 diopter (D) or less, or with a trifocal toric hydrophilic IOL (FineVision POD FT) if astigmatism was more than 1.0 D. Outcomes analyzed 3 months after surgery included monocular and binocular visual acuities at distance, near, and intermediate, both uncorrected and corrected. Defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction were also assessed.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups in monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA) (P = .38), monocular corrected distance (CDVA) (P = .22), or distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA) (P = .95) visual acuities; however, the distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) was slightly better in the spherical IOL group (P = .008). The UDVA was 20/25 or better in 89% of eyes in the spherical IOL group and 93% in the toric IOL group. The DCIVA was 20/32 or better in 92% of eyes in the spherical IOL group and 93% in the toric IOL group at 80 cm (Radner Vissum chart), and 20/32 or better in 100% of eyes in both groups at 63 cm (Colenbrander chart). The DCNVA (Radner chart) was 20/32 or better in 89% of eyes in the spherical IOL group and 90% of eyes in the toric IOL group. There was no difference between the groups in contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, cylinder, or satisfaction results.
Conclusion: Patients had significant improvement in visual acuity and gained functional uncorrected visual acuity across all distances in both groups. Satisfaction was high with both IOLs.


Tipo de documento:Artículo
Información Adicional:

Submitted: December 15, 2017|Final revision submitted: August 27, 2018|Accepted: September 27, 2018

Palabras clave:Intraocular lens, toric lens; IOLs; Visual outcomes; Visual acuity
Materias:Ciencias Biomédicas > Óptica y optometría > Lentes de contacto
Ciencias Biomédicas > Óptica y optometría > Optometría
Ciencias Biomédicas > Óptica y optometría > Materiales ópticos
Código ID:50466
Depositado:08 Ene 2019 09:57
Última Modificación:08 Ene 2019 09:57

Descargas en el último año

Sólo personal del repositorio: página de control del artículo