Publication:
Mega sporting event legacies: a multifaceted concept

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2012
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI)
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
The legacy of mega sporting events can be perceived in several ways. It can be seen as positive or negative, tangible or intangible, territorial or personal, intentional or unintentional, global or local, short- or long-term, sport- or non sport-related, and can also be seen from the various event stakeholders’ perspectives. In fact, it is much more appropriate to talk about legacies in the plural than simply legacy. This paper gives a broad overview of an often used but rarely defined concept, using examples from the legacies of the Olympic and Commonwealth Games, arguably two of the most important mega sporting events. It concludes that legacy essentially is a dream to be pursued rather than a certainty to be achieved.
L’héritage d’un grand événement sportif peut être perçu de multiples façons. On peut le voir comme positif ou négatif, tangible ou intangible, territorial ou personnel, intentionnel ou non, global ou local, à court ou long terme, lié au sport ou non, et aussi selon la perspective de ses différentes parties prenantes. En fait, il est bien plus approprié d’employer le terme d’héritages au pluriel qu’au singulier. Cet article donne une vue d’ensemble d’un concept souvent utilisé mais rarement défini – celui d’héritage (legacy en anglais) – en utilisant des exemples provenant des Jeux olympiques et des Jeux du Commonwealth, deux des plus grands événements sportifs multisports régulièrement organisés. Il conclue que l’héritage est pour l’essentiel un rêve à poursuivre plutôt qu’une certitude à atteindre pour ce qui concerne les grands événements sportifs.
Description
UCM subjects
Keywords
Citation
ABC (1997). A Legacy for Olympism. Athens: 2004 Olympic Bid Committee. ACOG (1997). The Official Report of the Centennial Olympic Games. Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games: Peachtree Publishers, 23. Available at: www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1996/1996v1.pdf (accessed 16th July 2012). Barget, E. and Gouguet, J.-J. (2007). “The total Economic Value of Sporting Events: Theory and Practice”, Journal of Sports Economics, 8, 165-182. Cashman, R. (2003). “What is Olympic Legacy” in The Legacy of the Olympic Games, 1984–2002 (Miguel de Moragas, Christopher Kennett and Nuria Puig, Eds.). Lausanne: International Olympic Committee, 31–42. Chappelet, J.-L. (2003). “The Legacy of the Winter Games: An Overview” in The Legacy of the Olympic Games, 1984–2002 (Miguel de Moragas, Christopher Kennett and Nuria Puig, Eds.). Lausanne: International Olympic Committee, 54–66. Chappelet, J.-L. and Junod, T. (2006). “A Tale of 3 Olympic Cities: What can Turin learn from the Olympic legacy of other Alpine cities?” in Major Sport Events as Opportunity for Development, Proceedings of the Valencia Summit 2006 (D. Torres, Editor), Valencia: Instituto Nóos, 83-89. Chappelet, J.-L. (2008). “Olympic Environmental Concerns as a Legacy of the Winter Games”, The International Journal of the History of Sport, 25 (14), 1884–1902. Close, P. Askew, D. and Xu, X. (2007). The Beijing Olympiad: The Political Economy of a Sporting Mega-Event. London: Routledge. DCMS (2008). Before, During and After: Making the Most of the London 2012 Games. London: Department of Culture, Media and Sport. Gratton, C., and Preuss, H. (2008). “Maximizing Olympic Impacts by Building up Legacies”. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 25(14), 1922-1938. Hiller, H. (2003). “Towards a Science of Olympic Outcomes: The Urban Legacy” in The Legacy of the Olympic Games, 1984–2002 (Miguel de Moragas, Christopher Kennett and Nuria Puig, Eds.). Lausanne: International Olympic Committee, 102-109. IOC (2001). Evaluation Commission Report, Games of the XIX Olympiad in 2008. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee. IOC (2009). 2018 Candidature Acceptance Procedure. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee. IOC (2011a). Beyond the Bid, Thriving Today: Legacies of Bidding for the Olympic Games. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee. IOC (2011b). Olympic Charter: In Force as from 1st July 2011. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee, page 13. Keech, M. (2012). “Youth Sport and London’s 2012 Olympic Legacy” in Watching the Olympics, Politics, Power and Representation by John Sugden and Alan Tomlinson (Eds.). London: Routledge, 82-96. LOCOG (2012). International Inspiration. London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games. Available at: www.london2012.com/join-in/education/international-inspiration (Accessed 15th July 2012). Misener, L. and Masson, D. S. (2009). “Urban Regimes and the Sporting Events Agenda: A Cross-National Comparison of Civic Development Strategies”, Journal of Sport Management, 22(5), 603-627. NAOOC (1999). Official Report of the 19th Olympic Winter Games. Nagano Olympic Organising Committee. Price, M. E. and Dayan, D. (Eds.) (2008). Owning the Olympics, Narratives of the new China. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. SPEAR (2009). A Systematic Review of Evidence Base for Developing a Physical Activity and Health Legacy from the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. London: Centre for Sport, Physical Education and Activity Research, Department of Health.
Collections