Publication: El paradigma de justicia democrática. Transformaciones de la idea de justicia para un mundo en globalización
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2019-08-19
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
La teoría de Rawls ha dominado los parámetros dentro de los que en términos filosóficos se ha planteado la cuestión de la justicia durante las últimas décadas. Sin embargo, nuevos fenómenos de los que se empezó a tomar conciencia a lo largo de los años noventa han puesto en crisis muchas de sus intuiciones fundamentales y perspectivas metodológicas. Entre estos fenómenos destaca la nueva realidad en la que nos sumerge la actual fase de la globalización, tan diferente al mundo de sociedades cerradas y autosuficientes para el que la teoría de Rawls estaba diseñada. En este contexto, han ido surgiendo nuevas concepciones de lo que se espera de una teoría de la justicia, de sus modos de justificación, de concebir las injusticias o de delimitar las reivindicaciones legítimas de justicia para las que el paradigma rawlsiano ofrece respuestas insuficientes. Se vuelve urgente, por lo tanto, una exploración de contrapropuestas no hegemónicas que puedan ofrecer respuestas mejor adaptadas a y más críticas con nuestro mundo actual, globalmente interrelacionado, complejo y en constante transformación...
Over the last decades Rawls’ theory has dominated the parameters within which, in philosophical terms, the question of justice has been posed. However, new phenomena that became apparent throughout the 1990s have brought many of his fundamental intuitions and methodological perspectives into crisis. Among these phenomena is the new reality of globalization in which we are currently immersed, so different from the world of closed and self-sufficient societies for which Rawls’ theory was designed. In this context, new conceptions have emerged of what is expected of a theory of justice, of its modes of justification, conceiving injustices or delimiting legitimate demands for justice, for which the rawlsian paradigm offers insufficient answers. It is therefore urgent to explore non-hegemonic counterproposals that can offer answers that are better adapted to and more critical of our present world, which is globally interrelated, complex and in constant transformation...
Over the last decades Rawls’ theory has dominated the parameters within which, in philosophical terms, the question of justice has been posed. However, new phenomena that became apparent throughout the 1990s have brought many of his fundamental intuitions and methodological perspectives into crisis. Among these phenomena is the new reality of globalization in which we are currently immersed, so different from the world of closed and self-sufficient societies for which Rawls’ theory was designed. In this context, new conceptions have emerged of what is expected of a theory of justice, of its modes of justification, conceiving injustices or delimiting legitimate demands for justice, for which the rawlsian paradigm offers insufficient answers. It is therefore urgent to explore non-hegemonic counterproposals that can offer answers that are better adapted to and more critical of our present world, which is globally interrelated, complex and in constant transformation...
Description
Tesis de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filosofía, leída el 26-06-2019