Publication: Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrialmarkets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2015
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Inc.
Abstract
Knowledge, as resource, and technological innovation, as a dynamic capability, are key sources for firm's sustained competitive advantage and survival in knowledge-based and high-tech industries. Under this rationale has emerged a research stream where knowledge management, organizational learning, or intellectual capital, help to understand and constitute the key pieces of one of the most complex business phenomena; the ‘firm's technological advantage’. This being so, it is also true that in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets, competitive success comes directly from continuous technological innovations, where a single organization cannot successfully innovate in isolation; therefore, firms should rely on external relationships and networks in order to complement its knowledge domains, and then, develop better and faster innovations. In this sense, I would like to highlight the cross-fertilizing role of three constructs that are nurtured by different research traditions: ‘collaborative/open innovation’, from Strategy and Innovation Management research; ‘absorptive capacity’, from‘A Knowledge-Based View’; and ‘market orientation’, from Marketing research.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation
in manufacturing firms: Evidence from the 199 Statistics Canada Innovation
Survey. Technovation, 25(3), 245–259.
Athaide, G., & Zang, J. (2011). The determinants of seller–buyer interactions during new
product development in technology-based industrial markets. The Journal of Product
Innovation Management, 28(Suppl. 1), 146–158.
Barrales-Molina, V.,Martínez-López, F. J., & Gazquez-Abad, J. C. (2014). Dynamicmarketing
capabilities: Toward an integrative framework. International Journal of
Management Reviews, 16(4), 397–416.
Chen, Y., Lin, M. -J., & Chang, C. -H. (2009). The positive effect of relationship learning and
absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial
markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 152–158.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting
from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke,W., &West, J. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New
Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The open innovation journey: How firms dynamically
implement the emerging innovationmanagement paradigm. Technovation,
31, 34–43.
Clark, K. (1989). Project scope and project performance: The effect of parts. Management
Science, 35(10), 1247–1259.
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning
and innovation. Administrative Science Quarlerly, 35, 153–176.
De Jong, J., & Freel, M. (2010). Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high
technology small firms. Research Policy, 39, 47–54.
Dean, A., & Kretschmer,M. (2007). Can ideas be capital? Factors of production in the postindustrial
economy: A review and critique. Academy of Management Review, 32,
573–594.
Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The
moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38, 96–105.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management
Journal, 17, 109–122.
Hakanen, T. (2014). Co-creating integrated solutions within business networks: The
KAM team as knowledge integrator. Industrial Marketing Management, 43,
1195–1203.
Huggins, R. (2010). Forms of network resource: Knowledge access and the role of interfirm
networks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 335–352.
Hughes,M.,Morgan, R., Ireland, R., & Hughes, P. (2014). Social capital and learning advantages:
A problem of absorptive capacity. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(3),
214–233.
Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. (2007). The performance effect of organizational
learning and market orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, 36,
694–708.
Lancioni, R., & Chandran, R. (2009). Managing knowledge in industrial markets: New
dimensions and challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 148–151.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining
innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management
Journal, 27(2), 131–150.
Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity
of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52,
822–846.
Lin, R. J., Che, R. H., & Ting, C. Y. (2012). Turning knowledge management into innovation
in the high-tech industry. Industrial Management & Data System, 112(1), 42–63.
Luthje, C. (2004). Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field. An empirical
study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation, 24, 683–695.
Martín-de Castro, G., Delgado-Verde, M., Navas-López, J. E., & López Sáez, P. (2011). Towards
an intellectual capital-based view of the firm. Origins and nature. Journal of
Business Ethics, 98, 649–662.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese
Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Reed, K. K., Lubatkin, M., & Srinivasan, N. (2006). Proposing and testing an intellectual
capital-based view of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 867–893.
Spithoven, A., Clarysee, B., & Knockaert, M. (2011). Building absorptive capacity to organize
inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 31, 10–21.
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the
types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 450–463.
Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Wallman, J. (2014). Fields of opportunity: How marketers design the transaction game
with transaction field maps. Industrial Marketing Management, 43, 726–735.
Zhara, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and
extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.