Publication: La definición aristotélica de la ΦΥΣΙΣ: un aspecto de la consumación histórica de la Grecia Clásica
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2021-06-23
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
En la medida en que la palabra θύζηο alude a ciertos aspectos de lo que en la antigua Grecia significa en general «ser», la misma es susceptible de ser ordinariamente empleada en dicha situación histórica de forma no restringida. Esto es así incluso por lo que respecta a Aristóteles, cuya filosofía se caracteriza no obstante por la definición dela θύζηο –por oposición a la ηέρλε– como un género del ser entre otros, por un lado, y por la correlativa especificación de la θπζηθή en el marco del saber como una filosofía teorética, por otro lado. Esa operación de definición es lo que se procede a estudiar en esta tesis doctoral, con vistas a comprender esta particularidad del pensamiento aristotélico como un momento esencial del desarrollo histórico de la antigua Grecia, y no como un contenido de una supuesta doctrina en torno a la «naturaleza». Este planteamiento, y el objetivo general en él indicado, determinan a su vez cuatro objetivos específicos de nuestro trabajo. En primer lugar, se nos plantea la exigencia de someter a crítica la interpretación corriente de la definición aristotélica de la θύζηο como un «principio interno del movimiento», con vistas a poner así de manifiesto el carácter trivial que imputamos a ésta. Este objetivo queda cumplido al término de la «Introducción»...
Due to the connection of its meaning with the one of «being» in the Ancient Greece, the word θύζηο can be said in reference to any kind of being and is, as a matter of fact, used in an unrestricted way. This is true even in the case of Aristotle, whose philosophy is however characterized, on the one hand, by the definition of θύζηο –in opposition to ηέρλε– as only a genus among others, and by the corresponding delimitation of the θπζηθή within the framework of the theoretical knowledges. This definition is here studied with a view to understanding such a particularity of Aristotelian thought as an essential moment of the historical development of Ancient Greece, and not as a content of a supposed doctrine about «nature».This approach, and the general objective just described, determine in turn four specific objectives of our work. First of all, we have to undertake a critical examination of the ordinary interpretation of the Aristotle‟s definition of θύζηο as an «internal principle of movement», with a view to bring to light its trivial character. We achieve this objective at the end of the «Introduction»...
Due to the connection of its meaning with the one of «being» in the Ancient Greece, the word θύζηο can be said in reference to any kind of being and is, as a matter of fact, used in an unrestricted way. This is true even in the case of Aristotle, whose philosophy is however characterized, on the one hand, by the definition of θύζηο –in opposition to ηέρλε– as only a genus among others, and by the corresponding delimitation of the θπζηθή within the framework of the theoretical knowledges. This definition is here studied with a view to understanding such a particularity of Aristotelian thought as an essential moment of the historical development of Ancient Greece, and not as a content of a supposed doctrine about «nature».This approach, and the general objective just described, determine in turn four specific objectives of our work. First of all, we have to undertake a critical examination of the ordinary interpretation of the Aristotle‟s definition of θύζηο as an «internal principle of movement», with a view to bring to light its trivial character. We achieve this objective at the end of the «Introduction»...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filosofía, leída el 04/02/2021