Publication: La democratización del psicoanálisis freudiano en Jacques Derrida
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2021-07-14
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El problema de la democratización del psicoanálisis freudiano guarda relación con el desplazamiento que el porvenir del psicoanálisis produce en su legado, instándolo hacia un inédito ámbito de responsabilidad. Un ámbito de responsabilidad que no se confunde con un saber tematizable de lo ético, de lo jurídico y de lo político, sino, más bien, un ámbito que requeriría que el psicoanálisis se dispusiera a aceptar, a decir “sí, sí”, a la peligrosidad de un “pensamiento del quizá”. Un pensamiento sin el cual, como va a mostrar Derrida, no hay responsabilidad ante lo porvenir. En este contexto, y tal como ya hemos señalado, vamos a optar dirigirnos hacia ese ámbito de responsabilidad siguiendo el rastro que se deja acuñar bajo el sintagma “psicoanálisis por venir” (psychanalyse à venir). En principio, por “psicoanálisis por venir” vamos a comprender el impulso que va ligando cada uno de los esfuerzos de interpretación que, a lo largo de su obra, Derrida lleva a cabo en torno a la obra del fundador del psicoanálisis...
The problem of the democratization of Freudian psychoanalysis is related to the displacement that the future (à-venir) of psychoanalysis produces in its legacy, urging it towards an unprecedented context of responsibility. A field of responsibility that is not confused with a thematizable knowledge of the ethical, the legal and the political, but rather, a field that would require psychoanalysis to be willing to accept, to say “yes, yes”, to the dangerousness of a “maybe thought”. A thought without which, as Derrida will show,there is no responsibility before the future (à-venir). In this context, and as we have already pointed out, we are going to choose to go towards that area of responsibility, following the trail that is left to coin under the phrase “psychoanalysis to come” (psychanalyse à venir).In principle, by “psychoanalysis to come” we are going to understand the impulse that is linking each one of the efforts of interpretation that, throughout his work, Derrida carries out around the work of the founder of psychoanalysis...
The problem of the democratization of Freudian psychoanalysis is related to the displacement that the future (à-venir) of psychoanalysis produces in its legacy, urging it towards an unprecedented context of responsibility. A field of responsibility that is not confused with a thematizable knowledge of the ethical, the legal and the political, but rather, a field that would require psychoanalysis to be willing to accept, to say “yes, yes”, to the dangerousness of a “maybe thought”. A thought without which, as Derrida will show,there is no responsibility before the future (à-venir). In this context, and as we have already pointed out, we are going to choose to go towards that area of responsibility, following the trail that is left to coin under the phrase “psychoanalysis to come” (psychanalyse à venir).In principle, by “psychoanalysis to come” we are going to understand the impulse that is linking each one of the efforts of interpretation that, throughout his work, Derrida carries out around the work of the founder of psychoanalysis...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filosofía, leída el 29/02/2021. Tesis retirada por expreso deseo del autor