Publication: Jerarquización de objetivos de gestión para el Parque Natural de Montesinho (Portugal)
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2017
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
En este trabajo se evalúa la priorización, y su robustez, de siete objetivos de gestión del Parque Natural de Montesinho mediante la utilización del método de las jerarquías analíticas (AHP). Para ello se ha realizado una encuesta a 21 estudiantes y profesores de titulaciones agrarias y forestales del Instituto Politécnico de Bragança. Además se comparan las valoraciones obtenidas con AHP y con un método de votaciones. Los resultados muestran que los objetivos de gestión más relevantes para este parque natural son los de Biodiversidad y Uso sostenible.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
[1] M de Castro, and V Urios, "A critical review of multi-criteria decision
making in Protected areas", Journal of Agricultural and Resource
Economics, 16 (2), 2016, pp-89-109.
[2] A Sen, Development as freedom Oxford Paperbacks. 2001.
[3] S Greco, J Figueira, and M Eh Multiple criteria decision
analysis . Springer's International series. Springer, New York, 2005.
[4] J Ananda, and G Herath, -criteria decision
making methods with special reference to forest management and
cal economics, 68(10), 2009, pp. 2535-2548.
[5] GA Mendoza, and H Martins -criteria decision analysis in natural
resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling
ecology and management, 230(1), 2006, pp. 1-22.
[6] L Diaz-Balteiro, J González-Pachón, and C Romero, Measuring
systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review
European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 2017, pp. 607-616.
[7] J Ananda, est
Environmental Management, 39(4), 2007, pp. 534-544.
[8] E Nordstrom, LO Eriksson, and K Ohman, Integrating multiple criteria
decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a
Forest Policy and Economics 12, 2010,
pp. 562-574.
[9] TL Saaty The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Planning priority setting,
resource allocation New York: McGraw-Hill. 1980.
[10] O S Vaidya, and S Kumar, Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of
applications European Journal of operational research, 169(1), 2006,
pp. 1-29.
[11] D Schmoldt, J Kangas, G A Mendoza, and Pesonen, M. (Eds.). The
analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental
decision making Vol. 3. Springer Science & Business Media. 2013.
[12] F Pérez-Rodríguez, and A Rojo-Alboreca, The triangle assessment
method: A new procedure for eliciting expert judgement Expert
Systems with Applications, 72, 2017, pp. 139-150.
[13] CA Bana e Costa, and JC Vansnick, A critical analysis of the
eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP European Journal
of Operational Research, 187, 2008, pp. 1422 1428.
[14] Multiple criteria decision support in forest
management the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained
Forest ecology and management, 207(1), 2005, pp. 133-143.
[15] A Kangas, S Laukkanen, and J Kangas, Social choice theory and its
applications in sustainable forest management Forest Policy
and economics, 9(1), 2006, pp. 77-92.
[16] TL Saaty Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic
European Journal of Operational
Research, 168(2), 2006, pp. 557-570.
[17] TL Saaty How to make a decision:
European journal of operational research, 48(1), 1990, pp. 9-26.
[18] J González-Pachón, and C Romero, A method for dealing with
inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons European Journal of
Operational Research, 158(2), 2004, pp. 351-361.
[19] MB Menezes, GJ da Silveira, and Z Drezner Democratic elections and
centralized decisions: Condorcet and Approval Voting compared with
Median and Coverage locations European Journal of Operational
Research, 253(1), 2016, pp. 195-203.
[20] JG Lapresta, BL Rodríguez, and MM Panero Generalización de la regla
de votación de borda mediante el uso de preferencias lingüísticas:
análisis de sus propiedades . 27 Congreso Nacional de Estadística e
Investigación Operativa. Lleida, 8-11 de abril de 2003.
[21] JC Azevedo, C Moreira, JP Castro, and C Loureiro, Agriculture
abandonment, land-use change and fire hazard in mountain landscapes
In Landscape Ecology in Forest Management
and Conservation: Challenges and Solutions for Global Change, Li, C.
Lafortezza, R. Chen J. Eds. HEP-Springer, Beijing 2011, pp. 329 351.
[22] P M Fernandes, C Loureiro, M Magalhães, P Ferreira, and M- Fernandes
M. Fuel age, weather and burn probability in Portugal International
Journal of Wildland Fire 2012, 21(4), pp. 380-384
[23] C Moreira, JP Castro, and J Azevedo, Landscape change in a
mountainous area in Northeastern Portugal: implications for
management WSEAS International Conference on Urban Planning
And Transportation (UPT'07), Heraklion, Crete Island, Greece, July 22-
24, 2008.
[24] A Lopez Ornat, A Pons and M Noguera Utilizacion de las categorias
de gestión de areas protegidas de UICN en la region mediterranea .
Consejeria de Medio Ambiente de la Junta de Andalucia, Sevilla,
Espana y UICN, Gland, Suiza y Malaga, Espana. 2007. 211 pp.