Publication: Vías de recurso frente a la vulneración de derechos fundamentales : el conflicto entre el derecho a la libertad de información y el derecho al honor y a la propia imagen
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2022
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El presente trabajo supone un análisis de viabilidad de la defensa propuesta ante una vulneración de derechos
fundamentales por parte del poder judicial, al confirmar un juicio de ponderación entre el derecho al honor y a la propia imagen y el derecho a la libertad de información, prevaleciendo el primero sobre el segundo en el caso objeto de estudio. Para ello, se detallan las características de cada derecho fundamental y las posibles vías de reconocimiento de la lesión tanto nacionales, mediante el
recurso de amparo ante el Tribunal Constitucional, como internacionales, a través de la demanda ante el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos.
Finalmente, se analiza la problemática actual en cuanto a la falta de exigencia del deber de veracidad dentro del fenómeno denominado “fake news” (noticias falsas), a causa del uso de la libertad de expresión y el anonimato de las redes sociales como paraguas bajo el que perjudicar la formación de una opinión pública libre, fundada y esencial en el sistema democrático.
This paper involves an analysis of the feasibility of the proposed defense against a violation of fundamental rights by the judiciary, by confirming a weighting judgment between the right to honor and one's own image and the right to freedom of information, prevailing the first over the second in the case under study. To do this, the characteristics of each fundamental right and the possible ways of recognizing the injury are detailed, both nationally, through the appeal in the Constitutional Court, and internationally, through the claim in the European Court of Human Rights. Finally, the current problem is analyzed regarding the lack of requirement of the duty of veracity within the phenomenon called "fake news", due to the use of freedom of expression and the anonymity of social networks as an umbrella under which harms the formation of a free, well-founded and essential public opinion in the democratic system.
This paper involves an analysis of the feasibility of the proposed defense against a violation of fundamental rights by the judiciary, by confirming a weighting judgment between the right to honor and one's own image and the right to freedom of information, prevailing the first over the second in the case under study. To do this, the characteristics of each fundamental right and the possible ways of recognizing the injury are detailed, both nationally, through the appeal in the Constitutional Court, and internationally, through the claim in the European Court of Human Rights. Finally, the current problem is analyzed regarding the lack of requirement of the duty of veracity within the phenomenon called "fake news", due to the use of freedom of expression and the anonymity of social networks as an umbrella under which harms the formation of a free, well-founded and essential public opinion in the democratic system.