Publication:
Accesibilidad de la red actual de Cercanías de Madrid y la incidencia en la misma del Plan de Infraestructuras Ferroviarias de Cercanías para Madrid (2009-2015)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2012-11
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Para evitar el desequilibrio territorial propio de grandes áreas metropolitanas como Madrid se debe adoptar una adecuada planificación que permita reducir los desplazamientos de la población y, por tanto, facilitar los movimientos espaciales. Es aquí donde entra en juego el concepto de accesibilidad que entraña una serie de aspectos a veces complejos de definir. Este trabajo pretende abordar estrictamente este tema mediante su aplicación sobre la red de Cercanías de Madrid. Además aprovechando el Plan de Infraestructuras Ferroviarias proyectado en el año 2009, se cuantifican e ilustran tanto los valores de accesibilidad actuales como los futuros una vez articulado y finalizado dicho Plan. Mediante la metodología propuesta y la aplicación de una serie de indicadores se alcanzan unos resultados lógicos y coherentes que ponen de manifiesto la mejoría de la red futura, la cual se muestra mucho más diversificada, más cohesionada y por lo tanto más accesible. Con todo ello la accesibilidad se muestra como un potente instrumento de planificación para predecir y revelar las pautas de desarrollo urbano. [ABSTRACT]In order to avoid territorial imbalance typical of large metropolitan areas such as Madrid, cities should adopt proper planning that can help reduce the displacement of the population and therefore facilitate spatial movement. This is where the concept of accessibility comes into play, which however involves a number of aspects that are sometimes complicated to define. This paper aims to address this issue strictly by looking at Madrid´s Cercanias network. In addition, it makes use of the Railway Infrastructure Plan designed in 2009 to quantify and illustrate both current accessibility values as well as future ones, once this plan is finalized. By means of the proposed methodology and the implementation of a series of indicators, logical and coherent results are achieved showing the improvement of the future network, which is proven to be much more diversified, more cohesive and thus more accessible. With all this in place, accessibility is shown to be a powerful planning tool with which to predict and reveal urban development patterns.
Description
Keywords
Citation
BRUINSMA, F.R. y RIETVELD, P. (1993). Urban agglomeration in European infrastructure networks. Urban Studies 30, pp. 919-934. CHANG, J. y LEE, J.H. (2008). Accessibility Analysis of Korean High-speed Rail: A Case Study of the Seoul Metropolitan Area. Transport Reviews, Vol. 28, 1, pp. 87-103. DALVI, M.Q. (1978). Behavioral modeling accessibility, mobility and need: concepts and measurement. En Hensher, D. et al, Behavioral Travel Modeling. London: Croom Helm. DUNDON-SMITH, D.M. y GIBB, R.A. (1994). The Channel Tunnel and regional economic development. Journal of Transport Geography 2 (3), pp. 178-189. GARCÍA, J.C. (2000). La medida de la accesibilidad. Revista Estudios de Construcción, Transportes y Comunicaciones, 88, pp. 95-110. GARCÍA, J.C., CARDOZO, O. y GUTIÉRREZ, J. (2008). Sistemas de información geográfica como herramientas en la estimación de las entradas en las estaciones de Metro de Madrid. En: Hernández, L. y Parreño, J. M. (Eds.), Tecnologías de la Información Geográfica para el Desarrollo Territorial. Servicio de Publicaciones y Difusión Científica de la ULPGC, pp. 56-69. GEERTMAN, S.C.M. y RITSEMA VAN ECK, J.R. (1995). GIS and models of accessibility potential: an application in planning. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9 (1), pp. 67-80. GOULD, P. (1969). Spatial Diffusion Commission of College Geography. Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC. GUTIÉRREZ, J. (1992). Movilidad en Madrid: la configuración espacial de los flujos. Economía y Sociedad, nº 6, pp. 99-122. GUTIÉRREZ, J. (2001). Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Journal of Transport Geography 9, 229-242. GUTIÉRREZ, J., GONZÁLEZ, R. y GÓMEZ, G. (1996). The European high-speed train network: predicted effects on accessibility patterns. Journal of Transport Geography 4 (4), pp. 227-238. GUTIÉRREZ, J. y URBANO, P. (1996). Accessibility in the European Union: the impact of the Transeuropean road network. Journal of Transport Geography 4 (1), pp. 15-25 GUTIÉRREZ, J. y GÓMEZ, G. (1999). The impact of orbital motorways on intrametropolitan accessibility: The case of the Madrid M-40. Journal of Transport Geography (Pergamon Press), vol. 7, 1999. HANSEN, W.G. (1959). How Accessibility Shapes Land-Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, vol. 5, pp. 76-106. HARRIS, C.D. (1954). The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 44, pp. 315-348. HARVEY, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Nueva York, Basil Blackwell. HELLING, A. (1996). Why we should care about intra-metropolitan accessibility and how we measure it. Paper presented at the Research Conference Spatial Technologies, Geographic Information and the City. (National Center for Geographic Information and analysis), Washington. HSIAO S., LU J., STERLING J. y WEATHERFORD M. (1997). Use of Geographic Information Systems for analysis of transit pedestrian access. Transportation Research Record, 1604, pp. 50-59. IZQUIERDO, R. (1996). Transportes: un enfoque integral. Servicio de publicaciones del Colegio Oficial de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puerto. JANELLE, D.G. (1969). Spatial reorganization: a model and concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 59, pp. 348-364. JONES, S.R. (1981). Accessibility measures: a literature review. Department of the Environment Department of Transport. TRRL Laboratory Report 967. KEEBLE, D., OFFORD, J. y WALKER, S. (1988). Peripherical Regions in a Community of Twelve. Office for official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels/Luxembourg. LINNEKER, B.J. y SPENCE, N.A. (1992). Accessibility measures compared in an analysis of the impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain. Environment and Planning A, 24, 1137-1154. LUTTER, H., PÜTZ, T. y SPANGENBERG, M. (1992). Accessibility and Peripherality of Community Regions: The Role of Road Long Distance Railway and Airport Networks. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. MARTÍN, J., GUTIÉRREZ, J. y ROMÁN, C. (2004). Data envelopment analysis (DEA) index to measure the accessibility impacts of new infrastructure investments: the case of the high-speed train corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Regional Studies, 38, pp. 697-712. MURRAY, A.T. (2001). Strategic analysis of public transport coverage. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35, pp. 175-188. SMITH, D.M. y GIBB, R.A. (1993). The regional impact of the Channel Tunnel. A return to potencial analysis. Geoforum 24 (2), pp. 183-192. SPENCE, N., LINNEKER, B. (1994). Evolution of the motorway network and changing levels of accessibility in Great Britain. Journal of Transport Geography 2 (4), pp. 247-264. THILL, J.C., HONG, T. y ZHOU, Y. (2011). Traveling in the three-dimensional city: applications in route planning accessibility assessment, location analysis and beyond. Journal of Transport Geography 19, pp. 405-421. ZHAO F., CHOW L.F., LI M.T., GAN A. y UBAKA I. (2003). Forecasting transit walk accessibility: a regression model alternative to the buffer method. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.