Publication:
Estudio morfológico de los efectos de distintos acondicionamientos del esmalte y la dentina sobre la eficacia de unión de un cemento autoadhesivo

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2012
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Description
Keywords
Citation
1. Nicholson JW, McKenzie M. The properties of polymerizable luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26(10): 767-774. 2. Fraga R, Luca-Fraga L, Pimienta LA. Physical properties of resinous cements: an in vitro study. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 1064-1067. 3. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81 (2): 135-141. 4. Braga R, Cesar PD, Gonzaga CC. Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation modes. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 257-262. 5. Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 609-621. 6. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 265-273. 7. Ciencia de los materiales dentales. Kenneth J Anusavice. 11º Edición, 2004, Elsevier. España. 8. Restauraciones adhesivas no metálicas. Didier Dietschi, Roberto Spreafico. 1ª Edición, 1998, Masson. España. 9. Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 380-388. 10. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T; Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 71-80. 11. Komine F, Tomic M, Gerds T, Strub JR. Influence of different adhesive resin cements on the fracture strength of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 359-364. 12. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lectura. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28 (3): 215-235. 13. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeeck B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 963-971. 14. Frankenberg R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 324-330. 15. Piwowarczy A, Bender O, Ottl P, Lauer HC. Long-term bond between dual-polymerizing cementing agents and human bond dental tissue. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 211-217. 16. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambill JP, Neumann K, Kielbasa AM. Effect of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentin. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 809-818. 17. Pisani-Proença J, Erhardt MC, Valandro LF, Gutiérrez-Aceves G, Bolanos-Carmona MV, Del Castillo-Salmeron R, Bottino MA. Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 412-427. 18. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJT. Self-adhesive resin cements – chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2010. 19. Mazzitelli C. Evaluación de la unión entre cementos resinoso auto-adhesivos y la dentina [Tesis doctoral]. España. Universidad de Granada; 2008. 20. Guarda G, Gonçalves L, Correr A, Moraes R, Sinhoreti M, Correr-Sobrinho L. Luting glass ceramic restorations using a self-adhesive resin cement under different dentin conditions. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18(3): 244-8. 21. Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Evaluation of physical properties and surface degradation of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater J 2007; 26(6): 906-914. 22. Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites – a comparative study. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 934-941. 23. Erdemir U, Sar-Sancakli H, Yildiz E, Ozel S, Batur B. An in vitro comparison of different adhesive strategies on the micro push-out bond strength of a glass fiber post. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010. 24. Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Dentin treatment effects on the bonding performance of self-adhesive resin cements. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 80-86. 25. De Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Randall RC. Human pulp response to resin cements used to bond inlay restorations. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 954-962. 26. Glasspoole EA, Erichson EL, Davidson CL. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 454-462. 27. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 618-631. 28. Titley K, Chernecky R, Maric B, Smith D. Penetration of a dentin bonding agent into dentin. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 190-194. 29. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1530-1550. 30. Mc Comb D, Smith CD : A preliminary scanning electron microscopy study of root after endodontic procedures. J Endod 1975; 1: 238-242. 31. Suaquita VE. Fuerza de adhesión de una resina compuesta indirecta con diferentes tratamientos de superficie utilizando un cemento autoadhesivo sobre esmalte, estudio in vitro [Tesis doctoral]. Perú. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; 2007. 32. Huang TG, Schilder H, Nathanson D. Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin. J Endod 1992; 18: 209-215. 33. Rosen H. Operative procedures on multilated endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1961; 11: 973-986. 34. Helfer AR, Melnich S, Shilder H. Determination of the moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972; 34: 661-670. 35. Casanellas JM. Parte II: Reconstrucción de dientes endodonciados. Capítulo 3: Generalidades sobre los dientes endodonciados. Gaceta dental digital. 2005. (47-55). 36. Sauro S, Pashley DH, Montanari M, Chersoni S, Carvalho RM, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay FR, Patri C. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 705-713. 37. Hosaka K, Nakajima M, Yamauti M, Aksornmuang J, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on all-in-one adhesive bond strengths to dentin. J Dent 2007; 35: 207-213. 38. Elgalaid TO, Youngson CC, McHugh AF, Hall AF, Creanor SL, Foye RH. In vitro dentin permeability: the relative effect of a dentin bonding agent on crown preparations. J Dent 2004; 32: 413-421. 39. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Holz J, Pashley DH. Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vitro. J Endod 1995; 21: 191-194. 40. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Hiraishi N, Imazato S, Rueggeberg FA, Salz U, Zimmermann J, King NM. Tubular occlusion prevents water-treeing and through and through fluid movement in a single-bottle, one step self-etch adhesive model. J Dent Res 2005; 84 (10): 891-896. 41. Fogel HM, Marshall FJ, Pashley DH. Effect of distance from the pulp and thickness on the hydraulic conductance of human reticular dentin. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 1381-1385. 42. Smith JB, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Rueggeberg FA, Whitford GM, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Metrologic evaluation of the surface of white MTA after the use of two endodontic irrigants. J Endod 2007; 33: 463–467. 43. Hudis SI, Goldstein GR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55:33-38. 44. Stecher T, Munack J, Schwarze T, Geurtsen W. Restauraciones de ceramic en dientes anteriores y posteriores endodonciados. Quintessence 2003; 16 (4): 219-231. 45. Gutman JL. The dentin-root complex: Anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 458-467. 46. Bayne SC. Dental restorations for oral rehabilitation-testing of laboratory properties versus clinical performance for clinical decision makin. J Oral Rehab 2007; 34: 921-923. 47. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81 (2): 135-141. 48. Goracci C, Cury AH; Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8 (5): 327-335. 49. Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Microtensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater 2006; 22 (2): 45-56. 50. Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-kouma A, Eliades G. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 829-839. 51. Ayad MF. Effect of rotary instrumentation and different etchants on removal of smear laye ron human dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 67-72. 52. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1205-11 53. Valenzuela V, Bofill S, Kottmann C, Fodich I, Brunet J. Efecto del pulido radicular en la adhesión dentinaria: estudio al mircoscopio electrónico de barrido (MEB). Av Periodon Implantol 2010; 22 (1): 19-25. 54. Osorio R, Erhardt MC, Pimenta LAF, Osorio E, Toledano M. EDTA treatment improves resin-dentin bonds_ resistance to degradation. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 736–740. 55. Marshall GW, Yucel N, Balooch M, Kinney JH, Habelitz S, Marshall SJ. Sodium hypochlorite alterations of dentin and dentin collagen. Surface Science 2001; 491: 444-55. 56. Perdigao J, Thompson JY, Toledano M, Osorio R. An ultra-morphological characterization of collagen-depleted etched dentin. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 250-5 57. Wang Y, Spencer P. Evaluation of the interface between onebottle adhesive systems and dentin by Goldner_strichrome. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 66–72. 58. Spencer P, Wang Y, Katz JL. Identification of collagen encapsulation at the dentin/adhesive interface. J Adhes Dent 2004; 6: 91–95. 59. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Yoshida E, Hori M, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H. Resin-enamel bonds made with selfetching primers on ground esame. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 447–453. 60. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R, Handel G. Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 191–197. 61. Cantoro A, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Mazzitelli C, Fadda GM, Ferrari M. Effect of pre-cure temperature on the bonding potential of self-etch and self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2007; 24 (5): 577-583 62. Erhardt MC, Osorio R, Toledano M. Dentin treatment with MMPs inhibitors does not alter bond strengths to cariesaffected dentin. J Dent 2008; 36: 1068–1073. 63. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Limited decalcification/diffusion of self-adhesive cements into dentin. J Dent Res 2008; 87: 974–979. 64. Wilson PR. The effect of die spacing on crown deformation and seating time. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6(4): 397-401. 65. Wilson PR. Effect of increasing cement space on cementation of artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71(6): 560-4. 66. Wu JC, Wilson PR. Optimal cement space for resin luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7(3): 209-215. 67. Gavelis JR, Morency JD, Riley ED, Sozio RB. The effect of various finish line preparations on the marginal seal and occlusal seal of full crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 45: 138-145.