Publication: Estudio comparativo "in vivo" de un sistema de impresión convencional con elastómeros vs. un sistema de impresión digital (ITERO)
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2012
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
1. Malone W, Koth D. Tylman´s teoría y práctica en prostodoncia fija. 8th ed. Caracas: Actualidades medico-odontológicas latinoamericanas; 1991.
2. Bascones A. Tratado de Odontología. 1st ed. Madrid: 1998.
3. Vega J. Materiales en odontología: fundamentos biológicos, clínicos, biofísicos y fisicoquímicos. Madrid: Avances Medicos- Dentales; 1996.
4. Martinez-Rus F. Estudio experimental del ajuste marginal en coronas cerámicas de alto contenido en circonia. 2005.
5. Hunter A, Hunter A. Gingival margins for Crowns: a review and discusion II. Discrepancies and configurations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1990;64:636–42.
6. Garcia MC. ESTUDIO EXPERIMENTAL IN VITRO DE LA FIABILIDAD DE DISTINTAS TÉCNICAS DE IMPRESIÓN EN IMPLANTOLOGÍA. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 2010.
7. Hung S, Purk J, Tira D, Eick J. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1992;67(5):583–9.
8. Federick DR. Comparing the accuracy of reversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1997;128.
9. Ustrell-Torrent J. Historia de los materiales para prótesis dental. Dentum. 2003;3(1):28–9.
10. El primer ordenador del mundo | Microsiervos (Ordenadores) [Internet]. [cited 2012 Mar 11];Available from: http://www.microsiervos.com/archivo/ordenadores/el-primer-ordenador-del-mundo.html
11. Historia y evolución del CAD/CAM [Internet]. [cited 2012 Mar 11];Available from: http://www.castor.es/historia_CAD_CAM.html
12. Sutherland I. Interactive graphs by computer. Massachusets Institute of Technoloy. Boston (USA); 1962.
13. Gunn TG. Mecanización del diseño y de la fabricación. Investigación y Ciencia. 1982;74:32–3.
14. Cabani J. Caracterización microestructural y mecánica de materiales en base a cerámica elaborados por la tecnología CAD/CAM para su utilización en prótesis estomatológica. 2003.
15. Mörmann W. Dental CAD/CAM systems. A 20-year success store. Journal of the California Dental Association. 2006;173(9 (supplement)):7S-13S.
16. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental Impressions Using 3D Digital Scanners: Virtual Becomes Reality. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995). 2008;29(8):494, 496, 498–505.
17. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995) [Internet]. 2007 Aug;28(8):422–4, 426–8, 430–1. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18578100
18. Duret F. CAD/CAM in dentistry. Journal of the California Dental Association. 1988;177:715–20.
19. Duret F. CAD/CAM in dentistry: present and future applications in current concepts. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985). 1996;27:433–6.
20. Tovati B, Miara P, Nathanson D. Sistemas cerámicos actuales en odontología estética y restauraciones cerámicas. 1st ed. Barcelona: 2000.
21. Strub JR, Rekow ED, Witkowski S. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: Current systems and future possibilities. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) [Internet]. 2006 Sep;137(9):1289–96. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16946436
22. Salido MP, Suarez MJ, Pradíes G. Sistema Procera AllCeram: solución estética y funcional para restauraciones fijas múltiple. Revista Internacional de Prótesis Estomatológica. 2002;4(1).
23. Romeo M, Martínez J, Vallejo J. Introducción a los sistemas CAD/CAM de uso en clínica y laboratorio. Revista Internacional de Prótesis Estomatológica. 2005;7(5):524–34.
24. Cheah C, Chuack C, Tan K, Teo C. Integración de la digitalización de superficie mediante láser con las técnicas CAD/CAM en el desarrollo de prótesis faciales. Primera parte: Diseño y confección de réplicas protésicas. Revista Internacional de Prótesis Estomatológica. 2004;6(4):107–13.
25. Martinez A. Nuevo software para la planificación y colocación de implantes con cirugía guiada. Maxillaris. 2009;(Julio).
26. Kramer F-J, Baethge C, Swennen G, Rosahl S. Navigated vs. conventional implant insertion for maxillary single tooth replacement. Clinical oral implants research [Internet]. 2005 Mar [cited 2011 Jul 31];16(1):60–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15642032
27. Sohmura T, Kusumoto N, Otani T, Yamada S, Wakabayashi K, Yatani H. CAD/CAM fabrication and clinical application of surgical template and bone model in oral implant surgery. Clinical oral implants research [Internet]. 2009 Jan [cited 2011 Sep 22];20(1):87–93. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19126112
28. Birnbaum NS. The Revolution in Digital Impressioning. New England Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry. 2007;
29. Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2006;137(September):7–13.
30. Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeeck B, Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Wanherle G. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original on the update surface. Journal of dentistry. 1992;20:171–7.
31. Mörmann WH, SCHUG J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CAM inlays. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 1997;128:47–53.
32. www.sirona.com.
33. 3M-ESPE. Guía Técnica Lava TM C.O.S. Escáner Intraoral Lava COS.
34. Fasbinder DJ. Digital Workflow for the Lava COS System. 2009;5(Figure 4).
35. Garg AK. Cadent iTero’s digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dental implantology update [Internet]. 2008 Jan;19(1):1–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18399300
36. Logozzo S, Franceschini G. A Comparative Analysis Of Intraoral 3d Digital Scanners For Restorative State Of The Art And Comparative Analysis Of The Technological. The Internet Journal of Medical Technology [Internet]. 2011;5(1):1559–4610. Available from: http://www.ispub.com/journal/the-internet-journal-of-medical-technology/volume-5-number-1/a-comparative-analysis-of-intraoral-3d-digital-scanners-for-restorative-dentistry.html
37. Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A. A Comparative Analysis Of Intraoral 3d Digital Scanners For Restorative Dentistry. The Internet Journal of Medical Technology [Internet]. 2011;5(1):1559–4610. Available from: http://www.ispub.com/journal/the-internet-journal-of-medical-technology/volume-5-number-1/a-comparative-analysis-of-intraoral-3d-digital-scanners-for-restorative-dentistry.html
38. Mclaren EA. Communicating Digitally with the Laboratory: Design, Impressions, Shade, and the Digital Laboratory Slip. Inside Dentistry. 2009;(April).
39. Martinez-Rus F, Pradíes G, Suarez MJ. Cerámicas dentales: clasificación y criterios de selección. RCOE. 2007;12:253–63.
40. Romeo M. ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO DE AJUSTES EN PRÓTESIS FIJA CERÁMICA ENTRE SISTEMAS CAD-CAM E INYECTADO. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 2010.
41. Ozkurt Z, Kazazoglu E, Unal A. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of veneering ceramics to zirconia. Dental materials journal [Internet]. 2010 Mar;29(2):138–46. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20379023
42. Janda R. Cerámicas sin metal: composición, propiedades, aplicación, valoración. Quintessence Técnica. 2007;18(9).
43. Suarez MJ, Gonzalez P, Pradíes G, Salido MP. Comparison of the Marginal Fit of Procera AllCeram Crowns with Two Finish Lines. The International journal of prosthodontics. 2003;16(3):229–32.
44. Korkut L, Cotert HS, Kurtulmus H. Marginal, internal fit and microleakage of zirconia infrastructures: an in-vitro study. Operative dentistry [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2011 Oct 20];36(1):72–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21488732
45. Smith R. Creating well-fitting restorations with a digital impression system. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995) [Internet]. 2010 Oct;31(8):640–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20960994
46. Lee K-B, Park C-W, Kim K-H, Kwon T-Y. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems. Dental materials journal [Internet]. 2008 May;27(3):422–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18717171
47. Shillinburg H, Hobo S, Whisstt L. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1997.
48. Karlson S. The fit of Procera Crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1993;51:129–34.
49. Leinfelder K, Iseberg B, Essig ME. A new method for generating ceramic restorations: a CAD/CAM system. Journal of the California Dental Association. 1989;118(16):703–7.
50. Fons A, Sola M, Granell M, Oteiza B. Cofias internas para jackets diseñadas y maquinadas por ordenador. Revista Internacional de Prótesis Estomatológica. 1999;1(1):74–80.
51. Komine F, Gerds T, Witkowski S, Strub J. Influence of framework configuration on the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic anterior four unit frameworks. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2005;63(6):361–6.
52. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)
[Internet]. 2009 Oct;140(10):1301–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19797561
53. Christensen GJ. In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations The future? Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) [Internet]. 2008 Sep;139(January):83–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18762637
54. Christensen GJ. Is now the time to purchase an in-office CAD/CAM device? Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) [Internet]. 2006 Feb;137(2):235–6, 238. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16521390
55. Heigis G, Trampert ZTMMDTK-dieter. Digital impression taking with Cadent iTero in clinical use. DIGITAL_DENTAL.NEWS. 2010;(December):12–9.
56. Estafan D, Dussetschleger F, Agosta C, Reich SM. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays. General dentistry [Internet]. 2000;51(5):450–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15055635
57. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. Journal of dentistry [Internet]. 2010 Jul [cited 2011 Sep 22];38(7):553–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20381576
58. Cardelli P, Scotti R, Monaco C. Clinical fitting of CAD / CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. Journal of Dentistry. 2011;:1–8.
59. Fransson B. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dental Materials. 1985;
60. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. Journal of dentistry [Internet]. 2007 Jan [cited 2011 Sep 22];35(1):68–73. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16781043
61. Boening KW. Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2000;