Publication: La predicación: las construcciones "en abanico" : aplicaciones al español
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2013-07-12
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El estudio de las construcciones encabezadas por la preposición entre ha pasado, para la tradición gramatical y en trabajos descriptivistas posteriores, por el análisis categorial de dicha partícula introductoria, así como por la determinación del estatus sintáctico de tales sintagmas. Nuestra investigación describe los SSPP introducidos por entre partiendo de las propiedades léxicas de la preposición y estableciendo relaciones estrictamente sintácticas entre estas construcciones y sus argumentos, SSDD con papel semántico de Objeto/Tema. Estas relaciones ponen de manifiesto una “posición interna en un conjunto”, situación “descrita” por el SP en relación con su “sujeto” de predicación. Por ello es por lo que destacamos los valores locativo y colectivo en la preposición entre y denominamos ´Construcción en abanico` (en ing. ´in range`) para referirnos a los constituyentes encabezados por una preposición `locativa` que selecciona un complemento de naturaleza ´colectiva` (de ´gama`, ´surtido` o ´rango`). Asimismo, hemos descrito la naturaleza predicativa de las preposiciones, verbos, o adverbios que poseen semántica léxica propiamente ´locativa`, así como un paradigma que reúne la tipología ´colectiva` y distingue los sintagmas compatibles con entre en función de su caracterización como extremos, integrantes y cavidades. Por su parte, los “sujetos” de predicación de estas construcciones pueden ocupar posiciones argumentales no circunstanciales (sujetos, objetos directos y complementos regidos), argumentales circunstanciales (temporales y cuantitativos), adjuntas (temporales, espaciales y modales), oracionales (ad-oracionales y extra-oracionales) e internas en el dominio de un SP predicativo (atributo o complemento predicativo). Las relaciones sintácticas establecidas se definen, por lo tanto, como interpuestas, simétricas, sumativas, divisivas y optativas, presentando importantes restricciones respecto al tipo de construcción oracional (transitiva, intransitiva o ergativa) o nominal en el que se insertan. Por último, pueden extraerse conclusiones semánticas muy interesantes en relación con el tipo de verbos que se construyen con este tipo de SP, en particular, con aquellos que permiten interpretar contextos “compartitivos” (dividir, repartir, distribuir) y “selectivos” (estar, dejar, tener, quedar), así como su rendimiento como enunciados realizativos en estos mismos contextos.
The study of the constructions headed by the preposition between has past for the grammatical tradition and subsequent descriptive works, by the categorial analysis of the introductory particle, as well as the determination of the status of such syntactic phrases. Our research describes the PPPP introduced by between based on the lexical properties of the preposition and strictly syntactic relationships between these constructions and their arguments, DDPP with semantic role of Object/Theme. These relationships reveal a "internal position in a whole", situation "described" by the PP related to your "subject" of predication. Accordingly, we emphasize the locative and collective values in the preposition between and we use the expression “in range constructions” for refer to the “whole” constituent headed by a ´locative` preposition that selects a complement of 'collective' nature (´assortment` or 'range'). We have also described the nature of the predicative prepositions, verbs, adverbs all of which have intrinsically ‘local’ lexical semantics, as well as a paradigm that meets the ‘collective’ typology and distinguishes the phrases with between in function of its characterization as ends, members and cavities. In its turn, the "subject" of predication of these constructions can occupy positions in the manner of non-circumstantial arguments (subject, direct object and oblique), circumstantial arguments (temporal and quantitative), adjuncts (temporal, spatial and manner), sentence (ad-sentence and extra-sentence) and internal within the domain of a predicative PP (attribute or predicative complement). The syntactic relations established are defined, therefore, as position in the middle of, symmetry, sum, division and election, presenting important restrictions on the types of sentential construction (transitive, intransitive or ergative) or nominal in which are inserted. Finally, very interesting conclusions can be drawn in the semantic level in relation to the type of verbs that are built with this type of PP, in particular, with those who allow interpreting contexts "compartitives" (divide, distribute) and "selective" (be, leave, have, be), as well as its performance as performative statements in these same contexts.
The study of the constructions headed by the preposition between has past for the grammatical tradition and subsequent descriptive works, by the categorial analysis of the introductory particle, as well as the determination of the status of such syntactic phrases. Our research describes the PPPP introduced by between based on the lexical properties of the preposition and strictly syntactic relationships between these constructions and their arguments, DDPP with semantic role of Object/Theme. These relationships reveal a "internal position in a whole", situation "described" by the PP related to your "subject" of predication. Accordingly, we emphasize the locative and collective values in the preposition between and we use the expression “in range constructions” for refer to the “whole” constituent headed by a ´locative` preposition that selects a complement of 'collective' nature (´assortment` or 'range'). We have also described the nature of the predicative prepositions, verbs, adverbs all of which have intrinsically ‘local’ lexical semantics, as well as a paradigm that meets the ‘collective’ typology and distinguishes the phrases with between in function of its characterization as ends, members and cavities. In its turn, the "subject" of predication of these constructions can occupy positions in the manner of non-circumstantial arguments (subject, direct object and oblique), circumstantial arguments (temporal and quantitative), adjuncts (temporal, spatial and manner), sentence (ad-sentence and extra-sentence) and internal within the domain of a predicative PP (attribute or predicative complement). The syntactic relations established are defined, therefore, as position in the middle of, symmetry, sum, division and election, presenting important restrictions on the types of sentential construction (transitive, intransitive or ergative) or nominal in which are inserted. Finally, very interesting conclusions can be drawn in the semantic level in relation to the type of verbs that are built with this type of PP, in particular, with those who allow interpreting contexts "compartitives" (divide, distribute) and "selective" (be, leave, have, be), as well as its performance as performative statements in these same contexts.
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filología, Departamento de Lengua Española y Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada, leída el 18/01/2013