Publication:
Evaluación "in vitro" de la discrepancia marginal y microfiltración de cuatro cementos de resina usados en cementado de coronas de óxido de circonio

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2013
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Description
Keywords
Citation
1. De la Macorra, J. Conventional and adhesive luting cements. Clinical Oral Invest 2002;6:198-204. 2. Rezende, JM. Cemento, cimento. Revista de patología tropical 2011;40(1):101-102. 3. Bascones, A. Cementado odontológico Convencionales. Tratado en Odontología Tomo II. 3rd ed. Madrid: Avances; 2000. p. 1779. 4. Vega, J. Cementos en odontología (I): Consideraciones generales sobre cementos. Cementos de silicato. Cementos de fosfato de cinc. Cementos de policarboxilato de cinc. Materiales en odontología. Fundamentos biológicos, clínicos, biofísicos y físico-químicos. 1st ed. Madrid: Avances Medico-Dentales, SL; 1996. p. 371. 5. Macchi, R. Cementos. Materiales Dentales. 4th ed. Buenos Aires: Medica Panamericana; 2007. p. 139. 6. Palma, V. Cemento de resina. Análisis de sus propiedades e inconvenientes y ventajas de su uso. RIPE 2002;4(2):136-143. 7. Toledano, M. Cementos dentales. Arte y Ciencia de los Materiales odontológicos Madrid: Ediciones Avances; 2003. p. 253. 8. Díaz-Arnold, A. Currents status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(2):135-141. 9. Barrancos, M. Ionómeros de vidrios y compómeros. Operatoria Dental. 3rd ed. Buenos Aires: Médica Panamericana; 1999. p. 635. 10. Ferracane, J. Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, propierties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38(4):295-314. 11. Pan, YH. The effect of luting agents on the retention of dental implant-supported crowns. Chang Gung Med J 2005;28(6):403-410. 12. Squier R. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(6):793-798. 13. Pan, YH. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement retained dental implant restoration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(4):587-592. 14. Lim, H P. Carga de fractura de coronas totalmente cerámicas en circonio implantosoportada y adheridas con diferentes cementos. RIPE 2011;13(2):79-81. 15. Radovic, I. Self - adhesives Resin Cements: A literature Review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10(4):251-258. 16. White, S N. Cementos adhesivos y cementación. La carta odontológica 2000;5(14):18-23. 17. Suarez, M J. Factores a considerar en el cementado de las restauraciones de prótesis fija. RDOE 1994;6(6):335-340. 18. Kenneth, J. Cementos dentales para aplicaciones de adhesivos. Ciencia de los materiales dentales. De Phillips. 10th ed. Mexico: Mc Graw Hill Interamericana; 1996. p. 581. 19. Behr, M. Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: The therapeutic range of different cement types. Dent Mater 2008;24:1187-1193. 20. Han, L. Evaluation of physical properties and surface degradation of self adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater J 2007;26(6):906-914. 21. Cantoro, A. Effect of pre cure temperature on the bonding potential of self etch and self adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2008;24:577-583. 22. Spinell, T. Polymerization shrinkage kinetics of dimethacrylate resin cements. Dent Mater 2009;25:1058-1066. 23. Piwowarczyk, A. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crown. Dent Mater 2005;21:445-453. 24. Yoshida, K. In vitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25(4):285-291. 25. Milutinovíc – Nikolíc, A D. Porosity of different dental luting cements. Dent Mat 2007;23:674-678. 26. Câmara, D. Evaluation of bond strength of self adhesive cements to dentin with or without application of adhesive system. J Adhes Dent 2011;13(3):261-265. 27. De Souza, C. Human pulp response to resin cements used to bond inlay restorations. Dent Mater 2006;22:954-962. 28. Hirashi, N. Effect of pulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of luting resin cement to human dentin. Dent Mater 2009;25:58-66. 29. Walker, P. Mechanical property characterization of resin cement after aqueous aging with and without cyclic loading. Dent Mat 2003;19:645-652. 30. Rosenstiel, S. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(3):280-301. 31. De Munck, J. Bonding of an autoadhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963-971. 32. Díaz De Souza, G. Effect of metal primers on microtensile bond strength between zirconia and resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(5):296-303. 33. Kenneth, M. The precision of fit: The procera all ceram crown. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80(4):394-404. 34. Goracci, C. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self etching and self adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006;8(5):327-335. 35. Dedmon, HW. Ability to evaluate nonvisible margins with an explorer. Oper Dent 1985;10:6-11. 36. White, SN. Influence of marginal opening on microleakage of cemented artificial crown. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71(3):257-264. 37. Suarez, MJ. Comparison of the marginal fit of procera all ceram crowns with two finish lines. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(3):229-232. 38. Azar, MS. Effect of preparation depth differences on the marginal fit of zirconia crown: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24(3):264-266. 39. Suarez, MJ. Estudio comparativo in vitro sobre el ajuste marginal con diferentes cementos. RIPE 2002;4(3):217-222. 40. Tao, J. The effect of finish line curvature on marginal fit of all ceramic CAD/CAM crowns and metal crowns and metal ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 2009;40(9):745-752. 41. Karatasli, O. Comparison of the marginal fit of different coping material and design produced by computer aided manufacturing system. Dent Mater J 2011;30(1):97-102. 42. Trajtenberg, CP. Microleakage of all ceramics crowns using self etching resin luting agents. Oper Dent 2008;33(4):392-399. 43. Gu, XH. Marginal discrepancies and leakage of all - ceramics crowns: Influence of luting agents and aging conditions. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(2):109-116. 44. Mou, SH. Influence of different convergence angles and tooth preparation heights on the internal adaptation of cerec crown. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87(3):248-255. 45. Sánchez, F. Control del colapso del colágeno: Sistemas autograbadores. Av Odontoestomatol 2004;20(4):175-183. 46. Holmes, JR. Considerations in measurements of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62(4):405-408. 47. Grenade, C. Fit of single tooth of zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(4):249-255. 48. Yüksel, E. Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all - ceramic crown systems. Braz Oral Res 2011;25(3):261-266. 49. Rossetti, P. Correlation between margin fit and microleakage in complete crowns cemented with three luting agents. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16(1):64-69. 50. Taylor, M. Microleakage. J Dent 1992;20(1):3-10. 51. Korkut, L. Marginal, internal fit and microleakage of zirconia infraestructures: An in - vitro study. Oper Dent 2011;36(1):72-79. 52. Martínez-Rus F. Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia - based ceramic copings. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(2):108-114. 53. Sorensen, JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64(1):18-24. 54. Wiedig, C. Performance profile of different new self adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2010;26(1):e62-e63. 55. Hooshmand, T. Microleakage and marginal gap of adhesive cements for noble alloy full cast crowns. Oper Dent 2011;36(3):258-265. 56. McComb, D. Adhesive luting cements-classes, criteria, and usage. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17(8):759-773. 57. Hikita, K. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71-80. 58. Kious, AR. Film thicknesses of recently introduced luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101(3):189-192. 59. Cementos dentales de base acuosa. Parte 1: Cementos ácido-base de polvo y líquido (ISO 9917-1:2007) 60. Cementos dentales de base acuosa. Parte 2: Cementos modificados con resina. (ISO 9917-2: 2010) 61. Coli, P. Fit of a new pressure - sintered zirconium dioxide coping. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(1):59-64. 62. Piemjai, M. Comparison of microleakage of three acid base luting cements versus one resin bonded cement for class V direct composite inlays. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(6):598-603. 63. Wang, CJ. Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(6):786-790. 64. White, SN. In vivo marginal adaptation of cast crowns luted with different cements. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74(1):25-32. 65. Hahn, P. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 2001;17(3):191-196. 66. Chieffi, N. Effect of the seating pressure on the adhesive bonding of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2006;19(6):333-336. 67. Sola, M. Estudio comparativo "in vitro" del ajuste marginal de restauraciones ceramométalicas y completas de cerámicas. Soproden 1993;9(3):67-70. 68. Quintas, AF. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92(3):250-257. 69. Wilson, PR. Low force cementation. J Dent 1996;24(4):269-276. 70. Fernández, E. Diseños de márgenes cervicales coronarios. Cómo y cuándo. Quintessence (ed esp ) 2002;15(8):493-501. 71. Suárez, MJ. Factores implicados en el sellado marginal de las restauraciones de prótesis fija. Av Odontoestomatol 1994;10(1):53-59. 72. Shearer, B. Influence of marginal configuration and porcelain addition on the fit of In - ceram crowns. Biomaterials 1996;17(19):1891-1895. 73. Cogolludo, PG. Influence of melting and casting methods and finish line design on the marginal discrepancy of Nickel - Chromium Titanium alloy crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23(5):443-445. 74. Gupta, R. In in-vitro evaluation of effect of different finish line on marginal adaptation in metal ceramic restaorations under thermo mechanical loading. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22(4):608-610. 75. White, SN. Film thickness of new adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67(6):782-785. 76. Castillo-Oyagüe, R. Misfit and microleakage of implant - support crown copings obtained by laser sintering and casting techniques, luted with glass - ionomer, resin cements and acrylic/urethane-based agents. J Dent 2013;41(1):90-96. 77. Chazine, M. Interfacial nanoleakage and internal cement thickness of three esthetic crown systems. Dent Mater 2012;28(10):1105-1111.