Publication: Building the meaning of preference from logical paired structures
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2015-07
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Making decisions by learning preferences requires to consider semantical aspects dealing with the meaning and use of the preference concept. Examining recent developments on bipolarity, where concepts are measured/verified regarding a pair of opposite poles, we focus on the dialectic process by which the meaning of concepts emerges. Our proposal is based on the neutrality in between the opposite poles, such that a basic type of structure is used to characterize in logical terms the concepts and the knowledge that they generate. In this paper we model the meaning of concepts by paired structures, and apply these structures for learning and building the different meanings of preference for decision making.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
K. Arrow, G. Debreu, Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy, Econometrica 22 (1954) 265–290.
[2] A. Bechara, The role of emotion in decision-making: evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage, Brain Cogn. 55 (2004) 30–40.
[3] N. Belnap, How a computer should think, in: G. Ryle (Ed.), Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy, Oriol Press, Stocksfield, 1977, pp. 30–55.
[4] K.C. Berridge, Pleasures of the brain, Brain Cogn. 52 (2003) 106–128.
[5] L.E.J. Brouwer, Intuitionism and formalism, Bull. (New Series) Am. Math. Soc.
37 (1999) 55–64. Reprinted from Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 20 (1913) 81–96.
[6] M. Bunge, Emergence and the mind, Neuroscience 2 (1977) 501–509.
[7] H. Bustince, J. Fernandez, R. Mesiar, J. Montero, R. Orduna, Overlap functions, Nonlinear Anal. 72 (2010) 1488–1499.
[8] J.T. Cacioppo, W.L. Gardner, Emotion, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50 (1999) 191–214.
[9] J.T. Cacioppo, W.L. Gardner, G. Bernston, Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: the case of attitudes and evaluative space, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 1 (1997) 3–26.
[10] L. Carreti, J. Albert, S. Lpez-Martn, M. Tapia, Negative brain: an integrative review on the neural processes activated by unpleasant stimuli, Int. J. Psychophysiol. 71 (2009) 57–63.
[11] Ch. Chen, Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114 (2000) 1–9.
[12] F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma, S. Alonso, F. Herrera, Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17 (2009) 14–23.
[13] G. Debreu, Theory of value, in: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium,Yale University Press, New Haven, 1959.
[14] D. Dubois, H. Prade, An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23 (2008) 866–877.
[15] D. Dubois, H. Prade, An overview of the asymmetric bipolar representation of positive and negative information in possibility theory, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160 (2009) 1355–1366.
[16] J. Fodor, M. Roubens, Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support, Kluwer Academic Publishers., Dordrecht, 1994.
[17] C. Franco, On the analytic hierarchy process and decision support based on fuzzy-linguistic preference structures, Knowl.-Based Syst. 70 (2014) 203–211.
[18] C. Franco, J. Montero, J.T. Rodríguez, On partial comparability and fuzzy preference-aversion models. Foundations of intelligent systems, Adv. Intell. Soft Comput. 122 (2012) 307–316.
[19] C. Franco, J. Montero, J.T. Rodríguez, A fuzzy and bipolar approach to preference modeling with application to need and desire, Fuzzy Sets Syst.214 (2013) 20–34.
[20] C. Franco, J.T. Rodríguez, J. Montero, An ordinal approach to computing with words and the preference-aversion model, Inf. Sci. 258 (2014) 239–248.
[21] C. Franco, J.T. Rodríguez, J. Montero, Bipolarity in social sciences and mathematics, Comput. Eng. Inf. Sci. 9 (2014) 336–339.
[22] N. Georgescu-Roegen, The pure theory of consumers behavior, Q. J. Econ. 50 (1936) 545–593.
[23] M. Ginsberg, Multivalued logics: a uniform approach to reasoning in AI, Comput. Intell. 4 (1988) 256–316.
[24] J. Goguen, The logic of inexact concepts, Synthese 19 (1969) 325–373.
[25] F. Grabenhorst, E.T. Rolls, Ch. Margot, M.A. da Silva, M.I. Velazco, How pleasant and unpleasant stimuli combine in different brain regions: odor mixtures, J. Neurosci. 27 (2007) 13532–13540.
[26] M. Grabisch, S. Greco, M. Pirlot, Bipolar and bivariate models in multi-criteria decision analysis: descriptive and constructive approaches, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23 (2008) 930–969.
[27] M. Grabisch, Ch. Labreuche, A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid, Ann. Oper. Res. 175 (2010) 247–290.
[28] D. Kahneman, Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk,Econometrica 47 (1979) 263–291.
[29] K. Kaplan, On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: a suggested modification of the semantic differential technique, Psychol. Bull. 77 (1972) 361–372.
[30] A. Keil, M. Stolarova, S. Moratti, W. Ray, Adaptation in human visual cortex as a mechanism for rapid iscrimination of aversive stimuli, NeuroImage 36 (2007) 472–479.
[31] P. Laarhoven, W. Pedrycz, A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 11 (1983) 229–241.
[32] J. Montero, H. Bustince, C. Franco, J.T. Rodríguez, D. Gómez, M. Pagola, J. Fernandez, E. Barrenechea. Paired structures and bipolar knowledge representation. MSAP Working Papers Series, 2014.
[33] J. Montero, D. Gómez, H. Bustince, On the relevance of some families of fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 158 (2007) 2429–2442.
[34] J. Montero, J. Tejada, C. Cutello, A general model for deriving preference structures from data, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98 (1997) 98–110.
[35] J. Montero, J.T. Rodríguez, C. Franco, H. Bustince, E. Barrenechea, D. Gómez,Neutrality in bipolar structures, Adv. Intell. Soft Comput. 214 (2013) 11–18.
[36] J. O’Doherty, M. Kringelback, E. Rolls, J. Hornak, C. Andrews, Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex, Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 95–102.
[37] Ch. Osgood, G. Suci, P. Tannenbaum, The Measurement of Meaning, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1958.
[38] P. Perny, A. Tsoukiàs, On the continuous extension of a four valued logic for preference modeling, in: Proceedings IPMU Conference, Paris, France, July 6–10,1998, pp. 302–309.
[39] J.T. Rodríguez, C. Franco, J. Montero, On the semantics of bipolarity and fuzziness, in: Proceedings EUROFUSE2011, Rgua, Portugal, September 21–23,2011, pp. 193–205.
[40] J.T. Rodríguez, C. Franco, B. Vitoriano, J. Montero, An axiomatic approach to the notion of semantic antagonism, in: Proceedings IFSA-AFSS2011, Surbaya, Indonesia, June 21–25, 2011, FT104-1/6.
[41] M. Roubens, Ph. Vincke, Preference Modelling, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.
[42] B. Roy, Partial preference analysis and decision-aid: the fuzzy outranking relation concept, in: D. Bell, R. Keeney, H. Raiffa (Eds.), Conflicting Objectives in Decisions, Wiley and Sons, New York, 1977, pp. 40–75.
[43] T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, United States of America, 1980.
[44] L. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics, Dover Publications, New York, 1972.
[45] R.C. Schank, Conceptual dependency: a theory of natural language understanding, Cogn. Psychol. 3 (1972) 552–631.
[46] E. Trillas, On a model for the meaning of predicates (A nave approach to the genesis of fuzzy sets), in: R. Seising (Ed.), Views of Fuzzy Sets and Systems From Different Perspectives, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009, pp. 175–205.
[47] E. Trillas, C. Moraga, S. Guadarrama, S. Cubillo, E. Castineira, Computing with antonyms, Stud. Fuzziness Soft Comput. 217 (2007) 133–153.
[48] A. Tsoukiàs, P. Perny, Ph. Vincke, From concordance/discordance to the modelling of positive and negative reasons in decision aiding, Int. Ser. Oper. Res. Manage. Sci. 44 (2002) 147–174.
[49] A. Tsoukı‘as, Ph. Vincke, A new axiomatic foundation of the partial comparability theory, Theor. Decis. 39 (1995) 79–114.
[50] A. Tsoukiàs, Ph. Vincke, Extended preference structures in multicriteria decision aid, in: J. Clmaco (Ed.), Multicriteria Analysis, Springer-Verlag,Berlin, 1997, pp. 37–50.
[51] A. Tversky, D. Kahneman, Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty, J. Risk Uncertain. 5 (1992) 297–323
[52] A. Van Duijvenvoorde, K. Zanolie, S. Rombouts, M. Raijmakers, E. Crone, Evaluating the negative or valuing the positive? Neural mechanisms supporting feedback-based learning across development, J. Neurosci. 28 (2008) 9495–9503.
[53] M. Viinikainen, P. Jääskeläinen, Y. Alexandrov, M.H. Balk, T. Autti, M. Sams, Nonlinear relationship between emotional valence and brain activity:evidence of separate negative and positive valence dimensions, Hum. Brain Mapp. 31 (2010) 1030–1040.
[54] J. Von Neumann, O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior,Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1953.
[55] Z.S. Xu, J. Chen, Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 184 (2008) 266–280.