Publication: La capacidad innovadora como determinante del aprendizaje.
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2011
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Instituto de Análisis Industrial y Financiero (IAIF)
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
En este trabajo se analiza el impacto en forma de aprendizaje y transferencia tecnológica de aquellos proyectos de I+D+i financiados con fondos públicos. Analizando el nivel de aprendizaje y de transferencia tecnológica, el perfil de las empresas con un mayor o menor nivel de aprendizaje. Además se analiza la relación del aprendizaje con el efecto de adicionalidad financiera de las ayudas, es decir, se relaciona el nivel de aprendizaje con el impacto de las ayudas sobre el gasto en I+D de las empresas subvencionadas.
La conclusión principal de este trabajo es que las características del comportamiento innovador de las empresas están altamente relacionadas con el nivel de aprendizaje. Resulta que las empresas con un mayor esfuerzo y orientación innovador consideran los efectos de aprendizaje mucho más importante que las empresas pocas innovadoras. Además se ha detectado un grupo de empresas pequeñas y pocas innovadoras que apenas han mejorado su capacidad tecnológica. Parece que para este tipo de empresas el proceso de aprendizaje no esta asegurada debido a la falta de experiencia y una masa crítica en un campo tan complejo y especializado como la innovación.
This paper analyzes the impact in the form of learning and technology transfer of those publicly funded R & D + I proyects. Analyzing the level of learning and technology transfer, the profile of the companies with a higher or lower level of learning. It also analyzes the relationship between learning and financial additionality aid effect, it means, the level of learning related to the impact of aid on expenditure on R & D of the subsidized firms. The main conclusion of this study is that the innovative behavior characteristics of firms are highly correlated with the level of learning. It turns out that companies with a major effort and oriented to innovative learning effects are considered much more important than a few innovative companies. It has also identified a group of small enterprises and hardly few have improved the innovative technology. It seems that for these companies the learning process is not assured due to lack of expertise and critical mass in a field as complex and specialized as innovation.
This paper analyzes the impact in the form of learning and technology transfer of those publicly funded R & D + I proyects. Analyzing the level of learning and technology transfer, the profile of the companies with a higher or lower level of learning. It also analyzes the relationship between learning and financial additionality aid effect, it means, the level of learning related to the impact of aid on expenditure on R & D of the subsidized firms. The main conclusion of this study is that the innovative behavior characteristics of firms are highly correlated with the level of learning. It turns out that companies with a major effort and oriented to innovative learning effects are considered much more important than a few innovative companies. It has also identified a group of small enterprises and hardly few have improved the innovative technology. It seems that for these companies the learning process is not assured due to lack of expertise and critical mass in a field as complex and specialized as innovation.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
Autio et al. (2008) First- and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs Research Policy nº 37 59–76. February 2002.
Bayona, C. García-Marco, T. Huerta, E. (2002) Firms´motivations for co-operative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms.
Becher, G. et al. (1989) FuE-Personalkostenzuschüsse: Strukturentwickelung, Beschäftigungswirkungen und Konsequenzen für die Innovationspolitik. ISI-Fraunhofer/DIW.
Belderbos, R.: Carree, M.: Diederen, B.: Lokshin, B.: Veugelers,R: (2003) Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies CEPR Discussion Papers Num 4021.
Brown, J.S., Duguid, P., 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science 2 (1), 40–57.
Buisseret, T., Cameron, H., Georghiou, L., 1995. What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management 10, 587–600.
Cohen, W., Y Levinthal, D. (1989) Innovation and Learning: The two Faces of R&D Implications for the Analysis of R&D Investment. Economic Journal, Vol. 99.
Geroski, Paul: Markets for Technology: knowledge, Innovation and Appropriability, in: Paul Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, 1995, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 90-131.
Hagedoorn, J., Link, A.N., and Vonortas, N.S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29, 567-586.
Hagendoorn, J.; Narula, R. (1996) Choosing orginasational modes of strategic technology partnering: interorgannizational modes of co-operation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14.
Heijs, J. (2001) Política tecnológicas e Innovación: Evaluación de la financiación pública de I+D en España.. Consejo Económico y Social de España, Madrid.
Heijs. J. (2003); Freerider behaviour and the public finance of R&D activities in enterprises: the case of the Spanish low interest credits for R&D. Research Policy, Vol. 32, Nº 3,445-461.
Heijs. J (2004). Innovation capabilities and learning: a vicious circle. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Número 5; Otoño 2004 (Pp. 263-278, ISSN, 1471-8167).
Heijs, J. Buesa, M. (2007). Cooperación en innovación en España y el papel de las ayudas públicas. Editorial: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
IMADE (1992) La Industria y los Empresarios Madrileños ante la Innovación Tecnológica. Imade, Madrid.
Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3), 577.
Kogut, Bruce: Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, 1988, pp. 319-332.
Kulicke, M; Bross, U.; Gundrum, U. (1997) Innovationsdarlehen Als Instrument Zur Förderung Kleiner und Mittlerer Unternehmen. ISI-Fraunhofer.
Molero, J.; Buesa, M. (Dir.). (1995) Análisis y Evaluación de la Actuación del CDTI: Política Tecnológica e Innovación en la Empresa Española. Una Evaluación de la Actuación del CDTI. Instituto de Análisis Industrial y Financiero.
Narula, R. (2004) R&D collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation. Technovation, 24: 153-161.
Schmidt, T. (2005) Absorptive capacity – one size fits all ?. Center for European Economic Research. Discusión. paper 05-72.
Schmidt, T. (2007) Motives for Innovation Co-operation – Evidence from the Canadian Survey of Innovation. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 07-018.
Steensma, H. K. 1996. Acquiring technological competencies through inter-organizational 17 collaboration: An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12: 267-286.
Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W. and de Boer, M. (1999) Co-evolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10, 551–568.
Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., R. Van Wijk and H.W. Volberda (2003), Absorptive Capacity:Antecedents, Models, and Outcomes., Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge Management, 278-301.
Vega-Jurado, J; Gutiérrez-Gracia, A.; Fernández-de-Lucio I. (2008) Analyzing the Determinants of Firm's Absorptive Capacity: Beyond R&D; R&D Management, Vol. 38, Issue 4, pp. 392-405, September 2008.
Winter, S. (1984) Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization (September).
Wollf, H.; Becher, G.; Delpho, H.; Kuhlmann, S.; Kuntze, U.; Stock, J. (1994) FuE-Ko-operationen von kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen: Bewertung der Fordermassnahmen des Bundesforschungsministeriums. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg.
Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185–203.