Publication: What dynamics can be expected for mixed states in two-slit experiments?
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2015-06
Authors
Sanz, Ángel S.
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Masson
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Weak-measurement-based experiments (Kocsis et al., 2011) have shown that, at least for pure states, the average evolution of independent photons in Young's two-slit experiment is in compliance with the trajectories prescribed by the Bohmian formulation of quantum mechanics. But, what happens if the same experiment is repeated assuming that the wave function associated with each particle is different, i.e., in the case of mixed (incoherent) states? This question is investigated here by means of two alternative numerical simulations of Young's experiment, purposely devised to be easily implemented and tested in the laboratory. Contrary to what could be expected a priori, it is found that even for conditions of maximal mixedness or incoherence (total lack of interference fringes), experimental data will render a puzzling and challenging outcome: the average particle trajectories will still display features analogous to those for pure states, i.e., independently of how mixedness arises, the associated dynamics is influenced by both slits at the same time. Physically this simply means that weak measurements are not able to discriminate how mixedness arises in the experiment, since they only provide information about the averaged system dynamics.
Description
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. Support from the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain) under Project Nos. FIS2011-29596-C02-01 (AS) and FIS2012-35583 (AL), and a "Ramon y Cajal" Research Fellowship with Ref. RYC-2010-05768 (AS) is acknowledged.
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
[1] J.S. Lundeen, B. Sutherland, A. Patel, C. Stewart, C. Bamber, Nature 474 (2011) 188–191.
[2] S. Kocsis, B. Braverman, S. Ravets, M.J. Stevens, R.P. Mirin, L.K. Shalm, A.M. Steinberg, Science 332 (2011) 1170–1173.
[3] Y. Aharonov, D.Z. Albert, L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1351–1354.
[4] Y. Aharonov, L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 41 (1990) 11–20.
[5] J. Dressel, M. Malik, F.M. Miatto, A.N. Jordan, R.W. Boyd, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86 (2014) 307–316.
[6] K. Vogel, H. Risken, Phys. Rev. A 40 (1989) 2847–2849.
[7] D.T. Smithey, M. Beck, M.G. Raymer, A. Faridani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 1244–1247.
[8] T.J. Dunn, I.A. Walmsley, S. Mukamel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 884–887.
[9] D. Leibfried, D.M. Meekhof, B.E. King, C. Monroe, W.M. Itano, D.J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 4281–4285.
[10] C.R. Leavens, Found. Phys. 35 (2005) 469–491.
[11] H.M. Wiseman, New J. Phys. 9 (2007) 165(1–12).
[12] R. Mir, J.S. Lundeen, M.W. Mitchell, A.M. Steinberg, J.L. Garretson, H.M. Wiseman, New J. Phys. 9 (2007) 287(1–11).
[13] A. Matzkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 150407(1–4).
[14] W.P. Schleich, M. Freyberger, M.S. Zubairy, Phys. Rev. A 87 (2013) 014102(1–4).
[15] K.Y. Bliokh, A.Y. Bekshaev, A.G. Kofman, F. Nori, New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 073022(1–17).
[16] B. Braverman, C. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 060406(1–5).
[17] E. Madelung, Z. Phys. 40 (1926) 322–326.
[18] D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85 (1952) 166–179.
[19] A.S. Sanz, S. Miret-Artés, A Trajectory Description of Quantum Processes. I. Fundamentals, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 850 Springer, Berlin, 2012.
[20] B.J. Hiley, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 361 (2012) 012014(1–11).
[21] G. Matteucci, M. Pezzi, G. Pozzi, G.L. Alberghi,F. Giorgi, A. Gabrielli, N.S. Cesari, M. Villa, A. Zoccoli, S. Frabboni, G.C. Gazzadi, Eur. J. Phys. 34 (2013) 511–517.
[22] C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Hermann, Paris, 1977.
[23] A.S. Sanz, F. Borondo, Eur. Phys. J. D 44 (2007) 319–326.
[24] A.S. Sanz, S. Miret-Artés, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 (2008) 435303(1–23).
[25] A.S. Sanz, F. Borondo, Chem. Phys. Lett. 478 (2009) 301–306.
[26] M. Davidović, A.S. Sanz, M. Božić, D. Arsenović, D. Dimić, Phys. Scr. T153 (2013) 014015(1–5).
[27] A.S. Sanz, S. Miret-Artés, A Trajectory Description of Quantum Processes. II. Applications, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 831 Springer, Berlin, 2014.
[28] T. Wünscher, H. Hauptmann, F. Herrmann, Am. J. Phys. 70 (2002) 599–606.
[29] A.S. Sanz, M. Davidović, M. Božić, S. Miret-Artés, Ann. Phys. 325 (2010) 763–784.
[30] M. Božić, M. Davidović, T.L. Dimitrova, S. Miret-Artés, A.S. Sanz, A. Weis, J. Russ. Laser Res. 31 (2010) 117–128.
[31] A.S. Sanz, M. Davidović, M. Božić, Ann. Phys. 353 (2015) 205-221.
[32] A. Peres, Stud. History Philos. Modern Physics 33 (2002) 23–34.
[33] G. Grössing, S. Fussy, J.M. Pascasio, H. Schwabl, Ann. Phys. 353 (2015) 271–281.
[34] G. Grössing, S. Fussy, J.M. Pascasio, H. Schwabl, Ann. Phys. 327 (2012) 421–437.
[35] J.S. Lundeen, C. Bamber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 070402(1–5).
[36] C. Bamber, J.S. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 070405(1–6).