Publication: Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Phase-difference operator’ ’’
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
1995-01
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
American Physical Society
Abstract
In response to the objection raised by Pegg and Vaccaro [the preceding Comment] we point out that their example is not a difhculty in directly representing the phase difference by the φ12 operator. In fact, we argue that it is a property common to a wide range of phase descriptions, including the Pegg-Barnett formalism.
Description
© 1995 The American Physical Society.
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
[1] D. T. Pegg and 3. A. Vaccaro, preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. A 51, 859 (1995).
[2] A. Luis and L. L. Sanchez-Soto, Phys. Rev. A 48, 4702 (1993).
[3] D. T. Pegg and. S. M. Barnett, Europhys. Lett. 6, 483 (1988); S. M. Barnett and D. T. Pegg, J. Mod. Opt. 36, 7 (1989).
[4] J. M. Levy-Leblond, Rev'. Mex. Fis. 22, 15 (1973); Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 101, 319 (1976); T. S. Santhanam, Found. Phys. 7, 121 (1977); S. M. Barnett and D. T. Pegg, Phys. Rev. A 41, 3427 (1990); L. L. Sanchez-Soto and A. Luis, Opt. Commun. 105, 84 (1994).
[5] P. Carruthers and M. M. Nieto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 441 (1968).
[6] S. M. Barnett and D. T. Pegg, Phys. Rev. A 42, 6713 (1990).
[7] A. Luis, L. L. Sanchez-Soto, and R. Tanas, Phys. Rev. A (to be published).
[8] J. W. Noh, A. Fougeres, and L. Mandel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1426 (1991);Phys. Rev. A 45, 424 (1992).
[9] U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, Phys. Rev. A 47, R2460 (1993).
[10] W. Schleich, R. J. Horowicz, and S. Varro, Phys. Rev. A 40, 7405 (1989).