Publication:
Underlying processes behind false perspective production

Thumbnail Image
Files
Manzanero, López & Aróztegui_2016.pdf (362.43 KB)
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.194461
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2016
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Google Scholar
Exportar
DC QDC MarcXML RDF MODS METS ORE-ATOM
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the extent to which Reality Moni-toring (RM) content analysis can provide useful information when discrim-inating between actual versus false statements. Participants were instructed to either describe a traffic accident as eyewitness actual role or to describe the accident as a simulated victim. Data were analysed in terms of accuracy and quality, and were represented using high dimensional visualization (HDV). In Experiment 1 (between-participant design), participants made significantly more references to cognitive operations, more self-references and less changes in order when describing the event as simulated victim. In Experiment 2 (within-participants design) participants also made signifi-cantly more references to cognitive operations and more self references when describing the event from the simulated victim as well as being less accurate, providing less irrelevant information and more evaluative com-ments. HDV graphics indicated that false statements differ holistically from actual ones.
El objetivo del presente estudio consistió en determinar si los procedimientos de análisis de contenido basados en las propuestas de Reality Monitoring (RM) pueden aportar información útil para discriminar entre declaraciones verdaderas y falsas. Se pidió a los participantes que describieran un accidente de tráfico desde su papel real de testigo o que lo describieran simulando ser la víctima. Los datos se analizaron en función de la exactitud y calidad de los relatos, y se representaron gráficamente mediante Visualización Hiperdimensional (HDV). En el experimento 1 (inter-sujetos) los relatos de las víctimas simuladas contenían más alusiones a procesos cognitivos, más auto-referencias y menos cambios de orden. En el experimento 2 (intra-sujetos) los relatos de las víctimas simuladas también contenían más alusiones a procesos cognitivos y más auto-referencias, pero además fueron menos exactos y aportaron menos información irrelevante y más juicios y comentarios personales. Los gráficos HDV indican que los relatos falsos difieren holísticamente de los reales
Description
UCM subjects
Psicología experimental , Psicología cognitiva , Psicología legal , Psicología aplicada , Criminología
Unesco subjects
6106 Psicología Experimental , 6104.01 Procesos Cognitivos
Keywords
Citation
Anderson, R. C. & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable in-formation following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90485-1 Barton, A. & Valdés, J. J. (2008). Hybrid unsupervised/supervised virtual re-ality spaces for visualizing gastric and liver cancer databases: An evolu-tionary computation approach. In A. An, S. Matwin, Z. W. Raś & D. Ślęzak (Eds.), Foundations of Intelligent Systems (pp. 256-261). Berlin: Springer. Bensi, L., Gambetti, E., Nori, R. & Giusberti, F. (2009). Discerning truth from deception: the sincere witness profile. The European Journal of Psy-chology Applied to Legal Context, 1(1), 101-121. Retrieved from http://www.usc.es/sepjf/images/documentos/volume_1/Bensi.pdf Buja A., Swayne D. F., Littman M., Dean N., Hofmann H. & Chen L. (2008). Data Visualization with Multidimensional Scaling. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17(2), 444-472. doi:10.1198/106186008X318440 Campos, L. & Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1998). Knowledge of crime context: Improving the understanding of why the cognitive interview works. Memory, 6, 103-112. doi: 10.1080/741941602 Clark-Carter, D. (2004) Quantitative psychological research. New York : Psycho-logy Press. Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Memon, A., Colwell, L. H., Taylor, L., & Woods, D. (2009). Training in Assessment Criteria Indicative of De-ception to improve credibility judgments. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 9(3), 199-207. doi:10.1080/15228930902810078 Comblain, C., D'Argembeau, A. & Van der Linden, M. (2005). Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for emotional and neutral events in older and younger adults. Experimental Aging Research, 31(2), 173-89. doi: 10.1080/03610730590915010 Diges, M. (1995). Previous knowledge and delay in the recall of a filmed event. In G. Davies, S.M.A. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice. International developments in research and practice (pp. 46-55). Berlin: W. de Gruyter. Diges, M., Rubio, M. E. & Rodríguez, M. C. (1992). Eyewitness testimony and time of day. In F. Lösel, D. Bender & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and Law. International Perspectives (pp. 317-320). Berlin: W de Gruyter. Feldman, R. S. (2006). Development across the life span. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L. & Flavell, E. R. (1995). The development of chil-dren’s knowledge about attentional focus. Developmental psychology, 31, 706-712. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.706 Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Landström, S. (2006). Children recalling an event repeatedly: Effects on RM and CBCA scores. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(1), 81-98. doi: 10.1348/135532505X49620 Hartwig, M., & Bond Jr., Ch. F. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 643-659. doi: 10.1037/a0023589 Hekkanen, S. T. & McEvoy, C. (2005). Source monitoring in eyewitness memory: Implicit associations, suggestions, and episodic traces. Memory and Cognition, 33(5), 759-769. doi: 10.3758/BF03193072 Henkel, L. A., Franklin, N. & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Cross-modal source monitoring confusions between perceived and imagined events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(2), 321-335. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.321 Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S. & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3 Johnson, M. K., Kahan, T. L. & Raye, C. L. (1984). Dreams and reality mon-itoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(3), 329-344. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.113.3.329 Johnson, M. K. & Raye, C. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67 Jones, D. P. H. & McGraw, J. M. (1987). Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse in children. Journal of interpersonal Violence, 2, 27-45. doi: 10.1177/088626087002001002 Köhnken, G., Manzanero, A. L., & Scott, M. T. (2015). Análisis de la Vali-dez de las Declaraciones (SVA): mitos y limitaciones (Statement Validity Assessment: Myths and limitations). Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 25, 13-19. doi:10.1016/j.apj. 2015.01.004 Lee, K. & Homer, B. (1999) Children as folk psychologists: The developing understanding of the mind. In A. Slater & D. Muir (Eds.), The Blackwell reader in developmental psychology. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Manzanero, A. L. (2006): Do perceptual and suggested accounts actually dif-fer? Psychology in Spain, 10(1), 52-65. Retrieved from http://eprints.ucm.es/11380/1/psychology_in_spain.pdf Manzanero, A. L. (2009). Análisis de contenido de memorias autobiográficas falsas (Criteria content analysis of false autobiographical memories). Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 19, 61-72. Manzanero, A. L., Alemany, A., Recio, M., Vallet, R., & Aróztegui, J. (2015). Credibility assessment of statements given by people with learning disa-bility. Anales de Psicología, 31 (1), 1-25. doi:10.6018/analesps.31.1.166571 Manzanero, A. L. & Diges, M. (1994). Análisis de la credibilidad de recuer-dos percibidos e imaginados (Credibility assessement of perceived and imagined memories). Apuntes de Psicología, 41-42, 81-92. Retrieved from: http://eprints.ucm.es/11043/ Manzanero, A. L. & Diges, M. (1995). Effects of preparation on internal and external memories. In G. Davies, S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMur-ran & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice. International de-velopments in research and practice (pp. 56-63). Berlin: W. De Gruyter & Co. Retrieved from http://eprints.ucm.es/6174/1/oxford_95.pdf Manzanero, A. L., El-Astal, S. & Aróztegui, J. (2009). Implication degree and delay on recall of events: An experimental and HDV study. The Eu-ropean Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 1(2), 101-116. Re-trieved from http://eprints.ucm.es/11383/1/Manzanero_et_al_2009.pdf Manzanero, A. L., López, B., Aróztegui, J., & El-Astal, S. (2015). Autobio-graphical memories for negative and positive events in war contexts. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 25, 57-64. doi:10.1016/j.apj. 2015.02.001 Manzanero, A. L., Quintana, J. M., & Contreras, M. J. (2015). (The null) Im-portance of police experience on intuitive credibility of people with in-tellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 191-197. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.009 Memon, A., Fraser, J., Colwell, K., Odinot, G., & Mastroberardino, S. (2010). Distinguishing truthful from invented accounts using reality monitoring criteria. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 177–194. doi: 10.1348/135532508X401382 Pérez-Mata, N. & Diges, M. (2007). False recollections and the congruence of suggested information. Memory, 15(7), 701–717. doi:10.1080/09658210701647258 Porter, S. & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: an investigation of the verbal cues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Hu-man Behavior, 20, 443-458. doi: 10.1007/BF01498980 Roberts, K. P., & Lamb, M. E. (2010). Reality-monitoring characteristics in confirmed and doubtful allegations of child sexual abuse. Applied Cogni-tive Psychology, 24(8), 1049-1079. doi: 10.1002/acp.1600 Rochat, P. (Ed.) (1999) Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Romero, E., Valdés, J. J. & Barton, A. J. (2007). Neural network based virtu-al reality spaces for visual data mining of cancer data: An unsupervised perspective. In F. Sandoval, A. Prieto, J. Cabestany & M. Graña (Eds.), Computational and ambient intelligence. (pp. 1020-1027). Berlin: Springer. Roskam, E. E. (1989) Formal models and axiomatic measurement. In E. E. Roskam (Ed.), Mathematical psychology in progress. Berlin: Springer-Berlag. Santtila, P., Roppola, H. & Niemi, P. (1998). Assessing the truthfulness of witness statements made by children (aged 7-8, 10-11, and 13-14) em-ploying scales derived from Johnson and Raye‘s model of reality moni-toring. Expert Evidence, 6(4), 273-289. doi: 10.1023/A:1008930821076 Schooler, J., Gerhard, D. & Loftus, E. (1986). Qualities of unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 171-181. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.12.2.171 Sporer, S. L. & Sharman, S. J. (2006). Should I believe this? Reality monitor-ing of accounts of self-experienced and invented recent and distant au-tobiographical events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 837-854. doi: 10.1002/acp.1234 Steller, M. & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-Based Content Analysis. En D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217-245). New York: Springer-Verlag. Steyvers, M. (2002). Multidimensional scaling. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Sci-ence. (pp. 1-7). London: MacMillan. Strömwall, L. A., Bengtsson, L., Leander, L. & Granhag, P. A. (2004). As-sessing children’s statements: The impact of a repeated Experience on CBCA and RM ratings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 653–668. doi: 10.1002/acp.1021 Trankell, A. (1972). Reliability of evidence. Stockholm: Rotobeckman Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327 Tversky, A. & Krantz, D. H. (1970). The dimensional representation and the metric structure of similarity data. Journal of mathematical psychology, 7, 572-596. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(70)90041-6 Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 101-121). Netherland: Kluwer Ac-ademic Publishers. Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A Qualitative Review of the First 37 Studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1), 3-41. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3 Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S. & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behaviour in children and adults. Hu-man Communication Research, 30(1), 8-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00723.x Wicker, A. W. (1975). An application of the multitrait-multimethod logic to the reliability of observational records. Personality and Social Psychology Bul-letin, 4, 575-579. doi: 10.1177/014616727500100405 Zahn-Waxler, C., Robinson, J. L. & Emde, R. N. (1992). The development of empathy in twins. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1038-1047. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1038
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/24274
Collections
Artículos