Publication: On-line multi-threaded processing of web user-clicks on multi-core processors.
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2011
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Medical imaging has become an absolutely essential diagnostic tool for clinical practices; at present, pathologies can be detected with an earliness never before known. Its use has not only been relegated to the field of radiology but also, increasingly, to computer-based imaging processes prior to surgery. Motion analysis, in particular, plays an important role in analyzing activities or behaviors of live objects in medicine. This short paper presents several low-cost hardware implementation approaches for the new generation of tablets and/or smartphones for estimating motion compensation and segmentation in medical images. These systems have been optimized for breast cancer diagnosis using magnetic resonance imaging technology with several advantages over traditional X-ray mammography, for example, obtaining patient information during a short period. This paper also addresses the challenge of offering a medical tool that runs on widespread portable devices, both on tablets and/or smartphones to aid in patient diagnostics.
Description
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011.
ISSN: 0302-9743
International Conference on High Performance Computing for Computational Science. (9. 2010. Berkeley, California. EEUU)
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
1. A. Arusu, J. Cho, H. Garcia-Molina, A. Paepcke and S. Raghavan. Searching the web. In ACM Trans 1(1):2–43, 2001.
2. C. Badue, R. Baeza-Yates, B. Ribeiro, and N. Ziviani. Distributed query processing using partitioned inverted files. In SPIRE, pp. 10-20, 2001 (IEEE-CS).
3. A. Barroso, J. Dean and U. H. Olzle. Web search for a planet: The google cluster architecture. In IEEE Micro 23(2): 22–28, 2002.
4. R. Baeza-Yates, A. Gionis, F. Junqueira, V. Murdock, V. Plachouras, and F. Silvestri. Design trade-offs for search engine caching. ACM TWEB, 2(4):1–28, 2008.
5. R. Baeza and B. Ribeiro, Modern Information Retrieval, Addison-Wesley.1999
6. S. Ding, J. He, H. Yan and T. Suel. Using Graphics Processors for High Performance IR Query Processing. Inem WWW, pp. 421–430,2009
7. K. Dragicevic and D. Bauer. A survey of concurrent priority queue algorithms. In IPDPS, pp. 1–6, 2008. 8. T. Fagni, R. Perego, F. Silvestri, and S. Orlando. Boosting the performance of Web search engines: Caching and prefetching query results by exploiting historical usage data. ACM TOIS, 24(1):51-78, 2006.
9. Q. Gan, T. Suel. Improved Techniques for Result Caching inWeb Search Engines. In WWW, pp. 431–440, 2009.
10. B. S. Jeong and E. Omiecinski. Inverted file partitioning schemes in multiple disk systems. IEEE Trans. Parallel and Distributed Systems, 11. R. Lempel, and S. Moran. Predictive caching and prefetching of query results in search engines. In WWW, pp. 19–28, 2003.
12. X. Long, and T. Suel. Three-level caching for efficient query processing in large Web search engines. In 14th WWW, pp. 257-266, 2005.
13. A. MacFarlane, J. McCann, and S. Robertson. Parallel search using partitioned inverted files. In SPIRE’02, pp 209–220., 2000 (IEEE CS).
14. E. Markatos. On caching search engine query results. Computer Communications, 24(7):137-143, 2000.
15. M. Marin and V. Gil-Costa. High-performance distributed inverted files. In Proc. CIKM pp. 935–938, 2007.
16. M. Marin, C. Bonacic, V. Gil-Costa and C. Gomez-Pantoja. A Search Engine Accepting On-Line Updates. In Euro-Par ’07: 13th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing LNCS 4641 pp. 348–357, 2007.
17. J. Zobel and A. Moffat. Inverted Files for Text Search Engines. In ACM Computing Surveys 38(2). 2006
18. M. Marin, R. Paredes and C. Bonacic, High-Performance Priority Queues for Parallel Crawlers, In 10th ACM International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management (WIDM 2008), California, US, Oct. 30, 2008.
19. W. Moffat, J. Webber, Zobel, and R. Baeza-Yates. A pipelined architecture for distributed text query evaluation. Information Retrieval, Aug. 2007.
20. M. Persin, J. Zobel and R. Sacks-Davis. Filtered document retrieval with frequency-sorted indexes. In Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(10): pp 749–764, 1996.
21. B. Ribeiro-Neto and R. Barbosa. Query performance for tightly coupled distributed digital libraries. ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 182–190, 1998.
22. W. Xi, O. Sornil, M. Luo, and E. A. Fox. Hybrid partition inverted files: Experimental validation. In ECDL’02, pp. 422–431, 2002.16(2):142–153, 1995.