Publication: Modelo de agenda estratégica: análisis de las actividades públicas de los gobernadores mexicanos
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2016-06-03
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Este estudio analiza cómo los gobernadores utilizan su agenda pública para hacerse más visibles. Esta investigación tiene tres propósitos principales: 1) proponer una nueva definición de agenda; 2) presentar una propuesta teórica que facilite el análisis y construcción de una agenda de actividades de los Gobernadores y; 3) entender cómo se relaciona la agenda de los Gobernadores con su aprobación. Las preguntas que atiende este trabajo son: ¿qué variables limitan la planeación y organización de las agendas públicas de los Gobernadores? ¿Cómo se relacionan las actividades de los Gobernadores con sus niveles de aprobación? ¿Hasta qué medida la agenda de los gobernadores se plantea estratégicamente? ¿Las agendas estratégicas son más efectivas para incrementar la aprobación de los Gobernadores? Esta investigación detalla qué factores deben ser tomados en cuenta en el diseño de la agenda diaria del Gobernador. Con base en una revisión detallada de todos los enfoques previos utilizados para entender las agendas, se presenta una nueva definición de agenda que puede ser útil en la ciencia política contemporánea. A partir de esta definición se plantea y explica una teoría para estudiar la agenda pública de los gobernadores mexicanos. La idea principal de esta tesis es que los gobernadores materializan su agenda pública entre un conjunto de opciones disponibles que les permitan ser visibles al público. Se clasificó en cuatro grupos estas opciones disponibles: 1) actividades institucionales; 2) eventos contingentes; 3) resultados de política pública; 4) eventos calendarizados. Como resultado de esta clasificación se muestra que el número de eventos no es relevante para incrementar –o disminuir– la aprobación de los Gobernadores, y que los eventos relacionados con la entrega de resultados de política pública tienen mayor incidencia en el nivel de aprobación de los Gobernadores en México...
This study analyzes how governors use their day-a-day public agenda as the power in the most disaggregated and clear instance they are allowed. This research was carried out based on three main purposes: (i) to provide a new definition of agenda, (ii) to present a theoretical proposal that allows a better understanding and an easier construction of Governor’s agenda and (iii) to understand how the agenda is related to Governor’s approval. From these purposes, this research answers the following questions: Which variables constrain the organization and planning of Governor’s public activities? How do the Governor’s activities relate to their ratings? To what extend governor’s agenda is strategically planned? Is a strategic agenda more effective when analyzing its relation to approval ratings? This research details which factors should be taken into account when designing a Governor’s public agenda day-day. After a detailed review of all the previous approaches to understand agendas, this study presents a new definition of agenda in contemporary political science. Once limited the definition of agenda and its boundaries, it proposes a theory to study the public agenda of Mexican Governors. The main idea of this thesis is that Governors materialize their public agenda from a range of options available to be visible in public activities. I classified these options into four groups: (1) institutional context activities, (2) events related to a contingency, (3) events of public policy results, and (4) calendric events. The analysis presented here examines how Governors materialize their public agenda and questions whether these decisions are supported in a maximization of public recognition and approval ratings...
This study analyzes how governors use their day-a-day public agenda as the power in the most disaggregated and clear instance they are allowed. This research was carried out based on three main purposes: (i) to provide a new definition of agenda, (ii) to present a theoretical proposal that allows a better understanding and an easier construction of Governor’s agenda and (iii) to understand how the agenda is related to Governor’s approval. From these purposes, this research answers the following questions: Which variables constrain the organization and planning of Governor’s public activities? How do the Governor’s activities relate to their ratings? To what extend governor’s agenda is strategically planned? Is a strategic agenda more effective when analyzing its relation to approval ratings? This research details which factors should be taken into account when designing a Governor’s public agenda day-day. After a detailed review of all the previous approaches to understand agendas, this study presents a new definition of agenda in contemporary political science. Once limited the definition of agenda and its boundaries, it proposes a theory to study the public agenda of Mexican Governors. The main idea of this thesis is that Governors materialize their public agenda from a range of options available to be visible in public activities. I classified these options into four groups: (1) institutional context activities, (2) events related to a contingency, (3) events of public policy results, and (4) calendric events. The analysis presented here examines how Governors materialize their public agenda and questions whether these decisions are supported in a maximization of public recognition and approval ratings...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, leída el 26-01-2016