Publication:
Estudio Delphi sobre la cooperativización de los servicios sociales En el territorio histórico de Gipuzkoa

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2016
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Escuela de Estudios Cooperativos
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
En el presente artículo se muestran los principales resultados obtenidos del estudio Delphi realizado a cargos políticos y técnicos del Departamento de Política Social de la Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa, sobre la posibilidad de cooperativizar la provisión de los servicios sociales en este territorio histórico. Para ello, el artículo se ha estructurado de dos partes diferenciadas. Una primera desarrolla el marco teórico que sirve de inspiración para el trabajo empírico, donde se apuntan las principales propuestas teóricas que inciden en la dimensión colectiva de la participación ciudadana en la gestión de los servicios públicos. Entre los distintos modelos, se han destacado aquellos que priorizan la participación ciudadana a través de entidades de economía social y solidaria. La segunda parte se dedica al relato de los resultados de la investigación de campo. Para ello, primero se exponen las notas metodológicas que dan cuenta del proceso de preparación del análisis Delphi, para acto seguido sintetizar los principales resultados obtenidos en este estudio. Este trabajo se cierra con un apartado de conclusiones y líneas futuras de trabajo.
This article shows the main results obtained from the Delphi study, which was made of politicians and technicians from the Department of Social Policy in the County Council of Gipuzkoa, concerning the possibility of cooperativizing the provision of social services in this historical territory. With this in mind, the structure of this article is in two different parts. The first part develops the theoretical framework which serves as inspiration for the empirical work, where note is made of the main theoretical proposals that have a bearing on the collective dimension of citizen participation in the management of public services. Among the various models, those which prioritise public participation through social and solidarity economy entities stand out. The second part concerns itself with the presentation of the field research results. To this end, the methodological notes concerning the preparation process for the Delphi analysis are presented first and this is immediately followed by a synthesis of the main results obtained in this study. The article ends with a section of conclusions and future lines of action.
Description
Keywords
Citation
ASCOLI, U. y RANZI, C.(ed.), (2002) Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix: the newstructure of welfare in an era of Privatization, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. BRANDSEN, T. y PESTOFF, V. (2008) An Introduction, in V. PESTOFF y T. BRANDSEN (Eds), Co-production.The third sector and the delivery of public services (pp. 1-9). Oxon: Routledge. ENJOLRAS, B. (2008) Gouvernance et intérêt général dans les services sociaux et de santé, Bruxelles, Bern, Berlin, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Oxford, Wien, Peter Lang (Collection : Économie sociale & Économie publique/Social Economy & Public Economy). EVERS, A. (1991) Shifts in the welfare mix, Eurosocial, nº 57/58, pp. 7-8. EVERS, A y SVETLIK, I. (1993) Balancing pluralism: new welfare mixes in care for the elderly, London, Avebury. EVERS, A. (2005) Mixed Welfare Systems and Hybrid Organizations: Changes in the Governance and Provision of Social Services, International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 28, nº 9, pp. 737-748, Taylor & Francis Inc. JOHNSON, N. (1999) Mixed Economies of Welfare: a Comparative Perspective, Pearson Education, Prentice Hall Europe, Hertfordshire. LANDETA, J. (1999) El método Delphi. Una técnica de previsión del futuro. Barcelona: Ariel Social. OSBORNE, S. y MCLAUGHLIN, K. (2004) The Cross-Cutting Review of the Voluntary Sector: Where Next for Local Government Voluntary Sector Relationships?, Regional Studies, vol. 38, nº 5, pp. 573-82. OSTROM, E. (1999) Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development, in M. MCGINNIS (ed.) Polycentric Governance and Development: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. PARKS, R.B., BAKER, P.C., KISER, L., OAKERSON, R., OSTROM, E., OSTROM, V., PERCY, S. L., VANDIVORT, M. B., WHITAKER, G. P. y WISON, R. (1991) Consumers as Co-Producers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations, Policy Studies Journal, vol. 9, nº 7, pp. 1001-11. PESTOFF, V. (1998, 1999, 2000) Beyond the Market and State. Social Enterprises and Civil Democracy in a Welfare Society; Ashgate eta English Editions. Singapore, Sydney eta Tokyo. PESTOFF, V. (2005) The Third Sector and the Democratization of the Welfare State: Revisiting the Third Sector and State in Democracy and Welfare Theory; Östersund: Research Report. PESTOFF, V., OSBORNE, S. P. y BRANDSEN, T. (2008) Patterns of Co-production in Public Services, in V. PESTOFF y T. BRANDSEN (Eds), Co-production.The third sector and the delivery of public services (pp. 99-103). Oxon: Routledge. VAILLANCOURT, Y. (2011) La economía social en la coproducción y la coconstrucción de las políticas públicas, Revista del Centro de Estudios de Sociología del Trabajo, nº3, pp. 31-68. WALZER, M. (1988) Socializing the Welfare State, in A. GUTMANN (ed.) Democracy and the Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Collections